Una abogada viaja en el tiempo y se cruza con otras mujeres de la historia que lucharon por sus derechos.Una abogada viaja en el tiempo y se cruza con otras mujeres de la historia que lucharon por sus derechos.Una abogada viaja en el tiempo y se cruza con otras mujeres de la historia que lucharon por sus derechos.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Fotos
Emy Ltr
- Jeanne d'Arc
- (as Emy Letertre)
Opiniones destacadas
RATED 8/10
Language: French
Source: Amazon Prime
RECOMMENDED
Full and full fun, if you know the French history and the characters, you will enjoy more. I was laughing like anything throughout the movie. The way they take on history is so fun to watch, the fantasy angle is very well suited for the main character.
I am wondering "is it possible to make movie like this in India"... Just relax about your leaders and enjoy the fun...
Full and full fun, if you know the French history and the characters, you will enjoy more. I was laughing like anything throughout the movie. The way they take on history is so fun to watch, the fantasy angle is very well suited for the main character.
I am wondering "is it possible to make movie like this in India"... Just relax about your leaders and enjoy the fun...
Because it provokes thought while educating and entertaining. No cgi, no car chases. Everything the right wing and the Trumpits hate. This one won't make the Fox movies list.
If you like some comedy and history with your culture this is it. Physical humour, great characters, great paced, fast talking... I had to regularly pause while watching to check I was understanding the banter correctly.
I thought it was a fresh take on Napoleon Bonaparte also.
Charlie, an unlikeable self centred lawyer takes a long time to be humbled and shaken from her arrogant, narrow views. For the first 20mins she thinks she's on some kind of drug trip as she faces a historical setting where women were punished for stepping outside of the confines of parent, cook, cleaner and wife. She continues to confront history and in at least a couple of cases, the incredibly slow pace that the French law moves at.
French women were the last of all developed countries to gain the right to vote.
Lots of great moments. It had me laughing out loud.
I need to rewatch it to check the hate reviews... maybe the subtitles were just really bad for them?
I thought it was a fresh take on Napoleon Bonaparte also.
Charlie, an unlikeable self centred lawyer takes a long time to be humbled and shaken from her arrogant, narrow views. For the first 20mins she thinks she's on some kind of drug trip as she faces a historical setting where women were punished for stepping outside of the confines of parent, cook, cleaner and wife. She continues to confront history and in at least a couple of cases, the incredibly slow pace that the French law moves at.
French women were the last of all developed countries to gain the right to vote.
Lots of great moments. It had me laughing out loud.
I need to rewatch it to check the hate reviews... maybe the subtitles were just really bad for them?
It's not all bad. The premise is intriguing. The dialogue...especially the lines given to the lead (Caroline Vigneaux) is witty. And speaking Ms. Vigneaux, she's hilarious. A gifted physical comedian who delivers visually as well as verbally. She's a joy to watch. And the pacing is good too...right up to the point where the viewer starts says 'OK, I get it. I got it 20 minutes ago. Now, wrap this up.' Only the movie doesn't. It keeps going on and on and on. Neither I nor my wife could make it to the end. We agreed that we couldn't take another minute.
What went wrong? Maybe it was the overtness of it all. Maybe the fact that after the first 20 minutes of the film, it had said all it had to say. Or maybe it was just the lack of subtlety. We both wanted to like the film. But too much is always too much.
What went wrong? Maybe it was the overtness of it all. Maybe the fact that after the first 20 minutes of the film, it had said all it had to say. Or maybe it was just the lack of subtlety. We both wanted to like the film. But too much is always too much.
10TaraDiD
This was a great movie. It's been on my watch list for a while. Finally I had the concentration to watch some subtitle movies. The actress is also the writer.
The writer puts herself in some fun and some historically interesting scenarios. It starts off with a character who is kind of repugnant but she is funny. She's also biased because of her family history and doesn't know it until she goes back in time. She gets taught gets taught a lesson on history and on equality. I learned a lot about French history too. More than I knew going in.
They even set it up for a sequel. And the issues they depict are really important and relevant today. Especially where I live a country where we all are supposed to equal and free but everybody is not equal and everyone is not free. As of right now there are some states that are trying taking control of women's bodies.
The writer puts herself in some fun and some historically interesting scenarios. It starts off with a character who is kind of repugnant but she is funny. She's also biased because of her family history and doesn't know it until she goes back in time. She gets taught gets taught a lesson on history and on equality. I learned a lot about French history too. More than I knew going in.
They even set it up for a sequel. And the issues they depict are really important and relevant today. Especially where I live a country where we all are supposed to equal and free but everybody is not equal and everyone is not free. As of right now there are some states that are trying taking control of women's bodies.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaEPILOGUE: "One isn't born a woman; one becomes one. --- Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex"
"A film inspired by true stories. For real."
A scene is then shown of Ruth Coppinger in the Irish Parliament in November 2018 showing a pair of thong underwear and discussing its recent use in a courtroom as unfair to women. Women and men are shown in demonstrations objecting to the use of panties as evidence of consent. A man is then shown reading a law outlawing cross-dressing for women. A statement is then shown saying this law was repealed in 2013. Protagonist is seen taking urine pregnancy test and realizing she is pregnant from her time travels.
- ErroresGeorge Sand tells Charlie of her affair with Frederic Chopin in a scene that takes place in 1850; Chopin died in 1849.
- Bandas sonorasBitch
Performed by Les Plastiscines
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Flashback?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 34min(94 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta