Rebel Moon - Parte 1: La niña del fuego
Título original: Rebel Moon - Part One: A Child of Fire
Una joven busca guerreros de otros planetas para luchar contra los ejércitos tiránicos que aterrorizan a su pacífica colonia.Una joven busca guerreros de otros planetas para luchar contra los ejércitos tiránicos que aterrorizan a su pacífica colonia.Una joven busca guerreros de otros planetas para luchar contra los ejércitos tiránicos que aterrorizan a su pacífica colonia.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 2 premios ganados y 4 nominaciones en total
Opiniones destacadas
Watching this film, it felt like it was created by committee and written for an audience that the director thinks is not particularly clever.
There were so many elements in this that seemed like they had been added because someone thought "hey wouldn't it be cool if there was a... *cool flying bird you can ride* or *a bar scene that looks like the one in Star Wars*
The script also needed some work. The parts of the story were just thrown in as backstory or someone explaining the bleeding obvious. A little more respect shown for the audience would have allowed us to know some of that through watching, understanding or less didactic dialogue.
On the plus side, it looks great. Visually there is always great depth and detail. I enjoyed it enough to want to see the next one, although I suspect my guesses about major plot developments will be correct.
There were so many elements in this that seemed like they had been added because someone thought "hey wouldn't it be cool if there was a... *cool flying bird you can ride* or *a bar scene that looks like the one in Star Wars*
The script also needed some work. The parts of the story were just thrown in as backstory or someone explaining the bleeding obvious. A little more respect shown for the audience would have allowed us to know some of that through watching, understanding or less didactic dialogue.
On the plus side, it looks great. Visually there is always great depth and detail. I enjoyed it enough to want to see the next one, although I suspect my guesses about major plot developments will be correct.
Hello,
Like evreyone who reads this (sorry i'm french and yes I hated Raygun), finally we have Zach Snyder. I saw his first cut and was unimpressed (hated the first version, too disney like for me).
But, his director's cut, the decription and details of the characters has finally caught up to me. I mean, we did not have any ulteriors or superiors motives for any characters and it was a pain in the neck. But with the director's cut, finally we can relate. Regarding the "violent" scene, finally we left Disney and went for a more "gore" approach (everyone has its limit). Personnaly, it wasn't gore enough knowing Snyder past work. However, the character evolution was spot on. Basically, watch the director's cut, it is so much better than the original one.
Like evreyone who reads this (sorry i'm french and yes I hated Raygun), finally we have Zach Snyder. I saw his first cut and was unimpressed (hated the first version, too disney like for me).
But, his director's cut, the decription and details of the characters has finally caught up to me. I mean, we did not have any ulteriors or superiors motives for any characters and it was a pain in the neck. But with the director's cut, finally we can relate. Regarding the "violent" scene, finally we left Disney and went for a more "gore" approach (everyone has its limit). Personnaly, it wasn't gore enough knowing Snyder past work. However, the character evolution was spot on. Basically, watch the director's cut, it is so much better than the original one.
I wanted this to be good so badly. Like really badly.
Other than the world design and effects, there really isn't much else to salvage from it.
In true Snyder style we've got lens flare and slow motion, but this time he's dialled it up over the top.
Some of the action scenes are absolutely ruined from way too much diving in and out of slow motion.
The biggest disappointment is the writing.
The first 70% of the film is absolutely a waste of time and not needed.
You don't find out most of the characters actual relevance until the back end of the film.
Everything before that is a mixture of utterly pointless painfully boring scenes done for the sole purpose of filler.
Looks great, but that's all.
Other than the world design and effects, there really isn't much else to salvage from it.
In true Snyder style we've got lens flare and slow motion, but this time he's dialled it up over the top.
Some of the action scenes are absolutely ruined from way too much diving in and out of slow motion.
The biggest disappointment is the writing.
The first 70% of the film is absolutely a waste of time and not needed.
You don't find out most of the characters actual relevance until the back end of the film.
Everything before that is a mixture of utterly pointless painfully boring scenes done for the sole purpose of filler.
Looks great, but that's all.
I think Zack Snyder didn't really do much research into this one. Maybe it's because it's a Netflix thing, I am not sure. There's so much borrowing from several other popular movies that I just wasn't invested in the story because it was all tooo basic and predictable.
You had the Thanos and Gamora moment in there, you are the Starwars Resistance vs The First Order moment in there. You had the Darthvader type figure in there. You had the Kylo Ren character in there. And the worlds looked like something from a Starwars episode.
Also the whole story was just weak, too weak for a director like Zack. I mean we've seen it done so many times from Lord of the Rings, to Game of Thrones, to even The Avengers. You are threatened by a bigger force, so you go around recruiting people to help you fight this force. That's basically it. There wasn't any rich subplot like we see in eg. Dune. Just very basic.
Does it warrant a part 2, I strongly don't think it did. It's lazy writing and directing and shouldn't be encouraged.
All in all, it's an ok movie. It's not bad like some reviews are saying. The effects are spot on, I loved the cinematography. The only drawbacks for me were the weak storyline, the awful fight sequence, the casting could have been better and the all too familiar scenes.
You had the Thanos and Gamora moment in there, you are the Starwars Resistance vs The First Order moment in there. You had the Darthvader type figure in there. You had the Kylo Ren character in there. And the worlds looked like something from a Starwars episode.
Also the whole story was just weak, too weak for a director like Zack. I mean we've seen it done so many times from Lord of the Rings, to Game of Thrones, to even The Avengers. You are threatened by a bigger force, so you go around recruiting people to help you fight this force. That's basically it. There wasn't any rich subplot like we see in eg. Dune. Just very basic.
Does it warrant a part 2, I strongly don't think it did. It's lazy writing and directing and shouldn't be encouraged.
All in all, it's an ok movie. It's not bad like some reviews are saying. The effects are spot on, I loved the cinematography. The only drawbacks for me were the weak storyline, the awful fight sequence, the casting could have been better and the all too familiar scenes.
As an other reviewer wrote, there are wooden language, wooden expressions and wooden dialogue.
The first ting I noticed in the movie was the words the actors spoke seemed like they had been written by a teenager... so many pointless words.
Then there where the actors speaking the words, they just seemed wierd and emotionless.
Then there are the action scenes. There are a lot of them, and they could have been really good. But the editing are just a bunch of normal speed, slow speed clipping to make it look good, and the bad guys just stand still doing nothing while the "hero" spends minutes moving around in the open...
CGI/Greenscreen galore.. but very well done. So this is perhaps the strongest part of the movie.
Waisted and nonsense slowmo sections... there are so many of them... and they are so pointless and gives nothing to the movie. There are movies and directors that know how to use slow motion sequences in a movie, and then there are this movie and director, that did not take that class... it's just a waist of time.
In summary, if you are able to ignore all the writing, dialogue, acting/directing issues... its a passable scifi action movie.
The movie could have been so much better, because there is a decent enough story underneath.. and they obviously had enough money to do what they wanted...
I'm assuming Netflix payed for this. So I'm guessing that there where a big payday for writer/director and no requirements for quality on the delivered product. So they just cut from the budget anyone that could have given the director feedback on the uality issues.
The first ting I noticed in the movie was the words the actors spoke seemed like they had been written by a teenager... so many pointless words.
Then there where the actors speaking the words, they just seemed wierd and emotionless.
Then there are the action scenes. There are a lot of them, and they could have been really good. But the editing are just a bunch of normal speed, slow speed clipping to make it look good, and the bad guys just stand still doing nothing while the "hero" spends minutes moving around in the open...
CGI/Greenscreen galore.. but very well done. So this is perhaps the strongest part of the movie.
Waisted and nonsense slowmo sections... there are so many of them... and they are so pointless and gives nothing to the movie. There are movies and directors that know how to use slow motion sequences in a movie, and then there are this movie and director, that did not take that class... it's just a waist of time.
In summary, if you are able to ignore all the writing, dialogue, acting/directing issues... its a passable scifi action movie.
The movie could have been so much better, because there is a decent enough story underneath.. and they obviously had enough money to do what they wanted...
I'm assuming Netflix payed for this. So I'm guessing that there where a big payday for writer/director and no requirements for quality on the delivered product. So they just cut from the budget anyone that could have given the director feedback on the uality issues.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaZack Snyder first conceived this as a Star Wars movie, and pitched it to Lucasfilm shortly after it was bought by Disney in 2012, but it never got off the ground.
- ErroresThe shape of the floating platform on Gondival [at 1:52:00] changes depending on where it is viewed from. When Noble lands on it, and later Kora (and all shots from above, and of their fight) it is octagonal, or eight-sided - i.e. five edges are often in the shot, two of which are parallel; but in all the shots from underneath (as when Kora falls over the edge) it is shown as hexagonal, or six-sided; however it cannot be both.
- Versiones alternativasOn August 2nd, 2024, Netflix released an R-rated director's cut of the film, titled Rebel Moon - Part One: Chalice of Blood. This version runs for 205 minutes (3h 25m) and features more violence, language and sexuality which were removed from A Child of Fire.
- Bandas sonorasThunderous
Written and Performed by Diego Stocco
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Rebel Moon - Part One: A Child of Fire
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 90,000,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución2 horas 13 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta