The Haunting of the Tower of London

Very good movie and setting. Something is always happening since many characters are involved in the plot. Great villain, actually Richard is the one who should be highlighted in the story, rather than the paranormal man or the two priests.

The director really had a plot going on here, it was not some mindless killing, which is not bad but sometimes it gets me a little fed up. It all comes down to trying to solve the muders of the two princes. In the end of the movie, when the plot had nowhere to go anymore, well, I liked what the writter did there.

Some violence here and there should mess things up for someone, but it really does not compromises the experience.

Prolific UK filmmaker Charlie Steeds writes, directs and edits this medieval horror chiller based on the infamous legend. As usual, this is a slim-budgeted venture, but Steeds enlivens scenes with some terrific cinematography and lighting and some (mainly) convincing acting. The playful, sometimes coarse, humour prevalent in some of the director's other productions is mainly absent here - instead, gratuity and gore is the main staple.

I really like these kinds of productions, and currently, there are plenty being made in the UK. They remind me of a modern-day Hammer style (the titles here are extremely reminiscent of the legendary studio's output and locations look similarly winter-bound).

It isn't flawless. The pace slackens here and there, some of the performances are not as sharp as they might be and occasionally the dialogue is anachronistic - but the story is a good one and well told. Happily, there are also some effectively creepy moments (and a particularly nasty third act). My score is 7 out of 10.

Set during the dying days of England's King Edward IV, this is a speculative version of the events that removed his legitimate heir and his brother and smoothed the process of ensuring that Richard III succeeded to give battle in vain. Now I say speculative because this has largely abandoned the history and supplanted it with the vivid imagination of auteur Charlie Steeds. He can't have had much money or time for anything here, but despite that he manages to film a certain effective eeriness to the scenarios. There is, however, nothing more to be said for this fanciful, slightly kinky, and really quite risible tale of usurpation. The acting is as bad as the writing - and that's saying something. Richard Rowden and Reece Connolly come across little better than easy on the eye drama school students and Tim Cartwright's attempt at portraying the megalomanic Richard III can be guaranteed to remind you of the original "Blackadder" series from forty years earlier. The myths about the princes in the tower are a great seam for film makers. This one? Well it's one that needs to be planted six feet under!

Avoid.

From the crap music, script to acting, its just terrible. I couldnt last the whole thing and I hate myself for even trying to watch it.

Save yourselves and watch something that has enjoyable well written and acted films, you will not get anything here but boredom or screams of laughter at it!

If you like appalling acting etc,then you'll love this!

I am all for people making a movie with little money,but this just doesn't cut it!

Mr Steeds needs to make fewer films and concentrate on putting his finances into something more worthwhile!