La brutal campaña de venganza de un hombre adquiere dimensiones nacionales cuando se descubre que es un antiguo agente de una poderosa organización clandestina conocida como "Los apicultores... Leer todoLa brutal campaña de venganza de un hombre adquiere dimensiones nacionales cuando se descubre que es un antiguo agente de una poderosa organización clandestina conocida como "Los apicultores".La brutal campaña de venganza de un hombre adquiere dimensiones nacionales cuando se descubre que es un antiguo agente de una poderosa organización clandestina conocida como "Los apicultores".
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado y 6 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Resumen
Reviewers say 'The Beekeeper' is an action-packed film with Jason Statham's intense performance. Themes of revenge, corporate greed, and online scams are prominent. Critics praise Statham and the action sequences but criticize the lack of originality, predictable plot, and bee metaphors. Some appreciate the social commentary, while others find the script and supporting cast lacking. The film is entertaining but not groundbreaking, with mixed opinions on its quality.
Opiniones destacadas
Statham 8/10
Action 8/10.
Story 6/10 Agent Parker 1/10
The action and the story are great. Statham is fantastic.
Unfortunately, after that the other actors are bad or worse. Agent Parker was horrendous, shocking that she was even cast. If you can put her acting aside, then it's a pretty solid and enjoyable movie.
The Beekeeper is worth checking out if you enjoy action and Jason Statham. The movie is comparable to some of his better movies: transporter, the mechanic, crank, expendables. Again, for what it is and putting the bad supporting actors aside then it is enjoyable. Enjoy the action!
Story 6/10 Agent Parker 1/10
The action and the story are great. Statham is fantastic.
Unfortunately, after that the other actors are bad or worse. Agent Parker was horrendous, shocking that she was even cast. If you can put her acting aside, then it's a pretty solid and enjoyable movie.
The Beekeeper is worth checking out if you enjoy action and Jason Statham. The movie is comparable to some of his better movies: transporter, the mechanic, crank, expendables. Again, for what it is and putting the bad supporting actors aside then it is enjoyable. Enjoy the action!
- Plot/Script= 5/10
- Cinematography = 7/10
- Acting = 6/10
- Enjoyability = 8/10
- Notes: Imagine the Equalizer but it's Jason Statham as a beekeeper....that's what this movie was. I can't lie it kept me entertained the entire time, the plot was just a bit weird to me. It almost seemed like a mix of comedy and action with some of these scenes being comically hilarious. The movie is exactly what you expect it to be, nothing more nothing less. It seemed liked the writers & director knew how absurd the plot was and embraced it well. If you looking for a straight action movie with some badass scenes then you will like this movie. Not to mention Josh Hutchinson did a great job playing a character which seemed to be almost identically based of the current President's son.
Verona Parker is easily one of the worst characters ever written for the screen, takes away everything this movie aspires to be. The actress also did a piss poor job and always had me cringing at the unrealistic and unreasonable choices she makes. If you'd delete that character entirely, this movie would've been a whole lot better in the long run.
Subject wise it's a very nice concept of a revenge thriller against scam call centers- but again, the whole govt mumbo jumbo makes it feel a whole run of the mill action BS from Hollywood mid tier movies. If the story had been awhole lot grounded, it would've done a whole lot better imo.
Subject wise it's a very nice concept of a revenge thriller against scam call centers- but again, the whole govt mumbo jumbo makes it feel a whole run of the mill action BS from Hollywood mid tier movies. If the story had been awhole lot grounded, it would've done a whole lot better imo.
A solid popcorn action flick. Jason is his standard typecast role, which you can't blame him for, he's a one trick pony but that one trick is entertaining.
The whole movie is a budget-bin version of John Wick, which again is ok if you accept it for what it is.
The main down fall is the casting of Emmy Raver-Lampan, who is just a stunningly bad actress. It's impossible to believe her on onscreen, even in a popcorn flick.
Jeremy Irons is a welcome sight and lends credibility to the film, even though he doesn't get much screen time.
Despite this I actually hope there's a sequel, fun action flicks are perfect beer and pizza viewing.
The whole movie is a budget-bin version of John Wick, which again is ok if you accept it for what it is.
The main down fall is the casting of Emmy Raver-Lampan, who is just a stunningly bad actress. It's impossible to believe her on onscreen, even in a popcorn flick.
Jeremy Irons is a welcome sight and lends credibility to the film, even though he doesn't get much screen time.
Despite this I actually hope there's a sequel, fun action flicks are perfect beer and pizza viewing.
So I rated this higher than it has a right to be rated but I don't want to take away from what could've been and what could be if there is a sequel.
This clandestine organization known as the Beekeepers is really compelling. I love the idea of this movie. However, the only good thing about this was Jason Statham and Jeremy Irons. The supporting actors were horrible and cartoonish. It went from being prospectively a terrific movie in the beginning, to just comical and not in a good B-movie (no pun intended) type of way.
The thing that destroyed this movie was the character writing. Statham's character didn't have much background and was an easy write as a typical elite action hero. Even so, they gave him some cheesy dialogue at times. Jeremy Irons was the only realistic character. Everyone else, especially the money folks, were like goofy caricatures of cartoon villains. His FBI tail, being his neighbor's (that he is avenging) daughter, had the most unrealistic plot line and character development you can imagine. She had zero grief nor internal conflict displayed. If they had gone a more serious direction, this movie would've been knockout. They should make a sequel with better writing.
This clandestine organization known as the Beekeepers is really compelling. I love the idea of this movie. However, the only good thing about this was Jason Statham and Jeremy Irons. The supporting actors were horrible and cartoonish. It went from being prospectively a terrific movie in the beginning, to just comical and not in a good B-movie (no pun intended) type of way.
The thing that destroyed this movie was the character writing. Statham's character didn't have much background and was an easy write as a typical elite action hero. Even so, they gave him some cheesy dialogue at times. Jeremy Irons was the only realistic character. Everyone else, especially the money folks, were like goofy caricatures of cartoon villains. His FBI tail, being his neighbor's (that he is avenging) daughter, had the most unrealistic plot line and character development you can imagine. She had zero grief nor internal conflict displayed. If they had gone a more serious direction, this movie would've been knockout. They should make a sequel with better writing.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaDue to the tight production budget ($34 million) the majority of the film was shot in the UK to qualify for UK tax relief.
- ErroresAt around 46 minutes, an FBI tactical unit is stopped from proceeding by the leader of the private security company waving a sheet claiming his team are there on the direct orders of the Governor, and tells the FBI tactical team to leave. This is absolutely not true in real life. The FBI is a federal agency and is not under any direct state control by any governor of a state.
- Citas
Agent Verona Parker: I believe you. But there are laws for that.
Adam Clay: There are laws for that. Until they fail. Then they've got me.
- Créditos curiososThe opening titles appear over a montage of footage of bees and historical records of bees.
- Versiones alternativasGerman TV version is cut by 5 minutes overall to secure a "not under 16" rating. The "not under 18" rated version elsewhere is completely uncensored.
- ConexionesFeatured in OWV Updates: OWV Cinema Poster Update (16/01/2024) (2024)
- Bandas sonorasBreath
Performed by RiLLA*
Written by James Damon Woodford
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Beekeeper?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- The Beekeeper
- Locaciones de filmación
- Kingsferry Bridge, Isle of Sheppey, Kent, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(elevator bridge scene)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 40,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 66,220,535
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 16,576,007
- 14 ene 2024
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 162,619,535
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 45min(105 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta