CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.6/10
47 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un ladrón profesional y su banda intentan llevar a cabo un épico atraco para robar 7 000 millones de dólares. Pero la traición, la avaricia y otras amenazas atentan contra su plan.Un ladrón profesional y su banda intentan llevar a cabo un épico atraco para robar 7 000 millones de dólares. Pero la traición, la avaricia y otras amenazas atentan contra su plan.Un ladrón profesional y su banda intentan llevar a cabo un épico atraco para robar 7 000 millones de dólares. Pero la traición, la avaricia y otras amenazas atentan contra su plan.
- Premios
- 3 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
For the most part I enjoyed the story but the random playback of episodes that was the hook by Netflix didn't work in my opinion. I personally feel I would have given more stars and be invested in the characters and story if it had unfolded based on timeline. I'm not a fan of series that use flashbacks in general and with the episodes playing in a non linear order felt jumbled at times.
That being said the characters were well flushed out and the actors cast did a great job. The final episode ( which is the same for everyone) did close a lot of gaps in the story and was a satisfying end to the limited series.
That being said the characters were well flushed out and the actors cast did a great job. The final episode ( which is the same for everyone) did close a lot of gaps in the story and was a satisfying end to the limited series.
Yes it could have been better. It's not perfect, but really what is. I watched over two nights in the order Netflix gave it me and I thought it was fine. If you need to watch it in chronological order, you'd missed the point. And those who say bad script, bad acting, bad direction blah blah. Tell you what, why not get off your couch and do better. Write something great, pitch it to Netflix. That's the problem with most couch critics, they love to trash everything, yet don't have an ounce of creative ability. Some shows deserve a bashing, because there is some absolute trash being made, but this isn't one of them. In my opinion...of course.
Despite this being a so called non-linear series (you can watch the episodes in any order and it still makes sense), I decided to watch them in chronological order and I'm glad I did.
If you would like to do the same, here is the episode order by timeline.
Violet - 24 years before the heist.
Green - 7 years before the heist.
Yellow - 6 weeks before the heist.
Orange - 3 weeks before the heist.
Blue - 5 days before the heist.
White - The heist.
Red - The morning after the heist.
Pink - 6 months after the heist.
The non-linear format : A nice idea but I would have been disappointed to end the series on certain episodes. Just my opinion though.
If you would like to do the same, here is the episode order by timeline.
Violet - 24 years before the heist.
Green - 7 years before the heist.
Yellow - 6 weeks before the heist.
Orange - 3 weeks before the heist.
Blue - 5 days before the heist.
White - The heist.
Red - The morning after the heist.
Pink - 6 months after the heist.
The non-linear format : A nice idea but I would have been disappointed to end the series on certain episodes. Just my opinion though.
Are you fed up with stories? Aren't they all becoming way too predictable, with their structured beginning, middle and end and cliched character arcs? Don't you wish for something novel, something that captures the unpredictability and 'chaos' of reality?
'Kaleidoscope' attempts something which, on the surface, appears quite revolutionary - the viewer is able to watch the episodes in any order and is encouraged to experiment - but is this merely a cheap tacked-on gimmick thought up at the last moment to try and inject some interest into an otherwise generic 'heist' drama?
Or is it something well thought-out that is intrinsically connected to the theme, plot and characters?
I'd say it's the former.
There was certainly nothing here that would entice me to ever watch the whole thing again in a different order. All the novelty of this approach achieved was a sense of dissatisfaction, distraction and a feeling that maybe it would have been better in the 'proper' order - whatever that was?
As for the drama itself - it was mildly entertaining nonsense.
The pacing was reasonably handled, it has a pretty decent cast and the heist itself was quite fun - all of which lift it just above average.
On the negative side, there was some terrible 'de-ageing' employed in one episode and I feel for the viewers who end up watching that one first. Also, none of the characters were particularly believable, there were multiple plot contrivances and the character arcs were limited and predictable. In other words, the story wasn't very well written - putting it in a different order isn't going to fix that.
I can't say which order I watched it in without delving too much into spoilers, on the other hand the whole concept means spoilers will occur for some as a consequence of the order they watch it in. All in all - a failed experiment.
For any other budding writers - master the basics before you mess with the formula.
'Kaleidoscope' attempts something which, on the surface, appears quite revolutionary - the viewer is able to watch the episodes in any order and is encouraged to experiment - but is this merely a cheap tacked-on gimmick thought up at the last moment to try and inject some interest into an otherwise generic 'heist' drama?
Or is it something well thought-out that is intrinsically connected to the theme, plot and characters?
I'd say it's the former.
There was certainly nothing here that would entice me to ever watch the whole thing again in a different order. All the novelty of this approach achieved was a sense of dissatisfaction, distraction and a feeling that maybe it would have been better in the 'proper' order - whatever that was?
As for the drama itself - it was mildly entertaining nonsense.
The pacing was reasonably handled, it has a pretty decent cast and the heist itself was quite fun - all of which lift it just above average.
On the negative side, there was some terrible 'de-ageing' employed in one episode and I feel for the viewers who end up watching that one first. Also, none of the characters were particularly believable, there were multiple plot contrivances and the character arcs were limited and predictable. In other words, the story wasn't very well written - putting it in a different order isn't going to fix that.
I can't say which order I watched it in without delving too much into spoilers, on the other hand the whole concept means spoilers will occur for some as a consequence of the order they watch it in. All in all - a failed experiment.
For any other budding writers - master the basics before you mess with the formula.
So, there was a lot of potential in the script, but a couple of things was a big letdown.
The story could easily have been told in 4 * 45 min episodes. The amount of fillers was annoying.
The plot is in many aspect not believeable, there are so many strange plot twists, and those are like... "What are they doing, have they lost it? " Even the episode that contains the money shot is to be honest rather bad... A heist story is easy to tell, and we as an audience do want the story to be at least party believeable, but nope, this is not the show that worth watching.
There are so many other heist movies out there.
The story could easily have been told in 4 * 45 min episodes. The amount of fillers was annoying.
The plot is in many aspect not believeable, there are so many strange plot twists, and those are like... "What are they doing, have they lost it? " Even the episode that contains the money shot is to be honest rather bad... A heist story is easy to tell, and we as an audience do want the story to be at least party believeable, but nope, this is not the show that worth watching.
There are so many other heist movies out there.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe story of Kaleidoscope is loosely inspired by real-life events surrounding Hurricane Sandy when $70 billion in bonds went missing from downtown Manhattan.
- ConexionesFeatured in Jeremy Vine: Episode #6.5 (2023)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Kaleidoscope have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Kaleidoscope
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 41min
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 16:9 HD
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta