Una mujer que alquila un alojamiento en Airbnb descubre que la casa en la que se aloja no es en absoluto lo que parecía.Una mujer que alquila un alojamiento en Airbnb descubre que la casa en la que se aloja no es en absoluto lo que parecía.Una mujer que alquila un alojamiento en Airbnb descubre que la casa en la que se aloja no es en absoluto lo que parecía.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 5 premios ganados y 38 nominaciones en total
Sophie Sörensen
- Bonnie
- (as Sophie Sorensen)
JR Esposito
- Jeff
- (as J.R. Esposito)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
No, they are not mutually exclusive.
First of all, props to the creators of this intensely riveting film for keeping us GLUED to the edge of our seats, in suspense, during the slow burn of a beginning, DESPITE thinking we knew what was going to happen.
Read that again.
In simple terms, even if this film had gone exactly the way we thought it would, the build-up to what we expected to happen, was masterfully handled.
Beyond that, the film declines in intensity during the second half, and expects more from the viewer in order to keep its believability factor.
I meant to add so much more, but I keep giving away too much and have to go back and delete it. I DETEST spoilers (unless I specifically ask for them) and those who think they actually gain something by revealing anything more than what is necessary. As such and as it is almost impossible to fully discuss the film without some reveals (and I possess tact enough not to spoil it for others), I will simply add that although there ARE a couple of "dumb" horror-film trope moments as in 'why did he/she do that' or 'why didn't he/she do that', they are in no way lastingly detrimental to the film. It is quite good, in that it quickly reels you back in and you all but forget about them - at least for the duration.
... It is also quite bad in the sense that it is off-the-wall bonkers.
It does gift viewers with a couple of funny/humorous moments, but they neither make or break the film.
In short, You will really like it, or you will hate it. Either way, see it before someone with less courtesy spoils it for you.
(The casting of Alexander Skarsgard was genius).
6.5-7/10.
First of all, props to the creators of this intensely riveting film for keeping us GLUED to the edge of our seats, in suspense, during the slow burn of a beginning, DESPITE thinking we knew what was going to happen.
Read that again.
In simple terms, even if this film had gone exactly the way we thought it would, the build-up to what we expected to happen, was masterfully handled.
Beyond that, the film declines in intensity during the second half, and expects more from the viewer in order to keep its believability factor.
I meant to add so much more, but I keep giving away too much and have to go back and delete it. I DETEST spoilers (unless I specifically ask for them) and those who think they actually gain something by revealing anything more than what is necessary. As such and as it is almost impossible to fully discuss the film without some reveals (and I possess tact enough not to spoil it for others), I will simply add that although there ARE a couple of "dumb" horror-film trope moments as in 'why did he/she do that' or 'why didn't he/she do that', they are in no way lastingly detrimental to the film. It is quite good, in that it quickly reels you back in and you all but forget about them - at least for the duration.
... It is also quite bad in the sense that it is off-the-wall bonkers.
It does gift viewers with a couple of funny/humorous moments, but they neither make or break the film.
In short, You will really like it, or you will hate it. Either way, see it before someone with less courtesy spoils it for you.
(The casting of Alexander Skarsgard was genius).
6.5-7/10.
UGH .... so close - SO CLOSE! But in the end, no cigar. All that potential and solid storytelling dissolving into to a nonsensical, clumsy, rushed, and ultimately unsatisfying conclusion, implementing all of the worst elements of horror movies. That's what disappoints the most. This movie held so much promise and had such a great start and journey all the way up until the end, but sadly the writer(s) somehow couldn't find the way to keep that strong storytelling up to par all the way through to the end. It wasn't that I disliked the end result. It was the clumsy way the screenplay got us there that left a lot to be desired. I was rolling my eyes on multiple occasions during parts of the final act. Video review to come soon.
This movie is textbook, to a T, the very definition of a cult film. This is the most "culty" film I've seen since rocky horror.
I don't really want to say much (or compare this to other films) because anything written will give expectations and this film is absolutely best if you go in blind and with zero expectations. I would really, really recommend avoiding all reviews and any discussion of this film prior to seeing it. If you're a horror fan this movie should be at the top of your list.
I will say that the person who made the trailer deserves a major award because the trailer gives away *nothing* at all, which is exactly how a trailer should be and trailers like this are so rare.
7/10.
I don't really want to say much (or compare this to other films) because anything written will give expectations and this film is absolutely best if you go in blind and with zero expectations. I would really, really recommend avoiding all reviews and any discussion of this film prior to seeing it. If you're a horror fan this movie should be at the top of your list.
I will say that the person who made the trailer deserves a major award because the trailer gives away *nothing* at all, which is exactly how a trailer should be and trailers like this are so rare.
7/10.
The good thing about the film: the setting. It's just wonderfully creepy when there's a huge vault under a "normal" house, which is then discovered by the protagonists.
But what doesn't work at all is the plot, because almost none of the protagonists' behaviour makes sense. They consistently make decisions that no normal person in their right mind would make. And so the plot is not driven by authentic behaviour of the characters, but only because the script wants it to be. And you can see this in the movie almost all the time.
If you always tell yourself while watching: I would never do that, what he or she has done now, then that is evidence of bad writing and ultimately of a bad film.
But what doesn't work at all is the plot, because almost none of the protagonists' behaviour makes sense. They consistently make decisions that no normal person in their right mind would make. And so the plot is not driven by authentic behaviour of the characters, but only because the script wants it to be. And you can see this in the movie almost all the time.
If you always tell yourself while watching: I would never do that, what he or she has done now, then that is evidence of bad writing and ultimately of a bad film.
For most I think this is one of those either you love it or you hate it movies. After viewing a couple of days ago I still am having issues deciding on which side of that divide I fall. For me, the opening act was exceptional. Skarsgård was fantastic in his role and Campbell also played her part excellently ( for the entire film really), but the two together had a perfect horror chemistry for me. I really was craving more screen time with both of them.
The movie then tries to combine a couple different backstories and attach them all together. I would say this was done with moderate success. The exposure of the character flaws was achieved through these backstories that helped the movie display the themes it set out to, however I felt a lot of time was wasted on irrelevant scenes. I suppose this was an attempt to keep you on your toes, but after knowing how the story ends I would have liked other areas of the story to be explored in a little more detail. Specifically, focusing a little bit more on "the mothers" history could have been quite powerful and informing. Instead, the audience is tasked with having to sort of use its imagination to envision exactly how "the mother" became what she is.
Overall, it was fine, loved some parts and hated others. However, I definitely don't see how this would ever be elevated to the level of a "classic".
The movie then tries to combine a couple different backstories and attach them all together. I would say this was done with moderate success. The exposure of the character flaws was achieved through these backstories that helped the movie display the themes it set out to, however I felt a lot of time was wasted on irrelevant scenes. I suppose this was an attempt to keep you on your toes, but after knowing how the story ends I would have liked other areas of the story to be explored in a little more detail. Specifically, focusing a little bit more on "the mothers" history could have been quite powerful and informing. Instead, the audience is tasked with having to sort of use its imagination to envision exactly how "the mother" became what she is.
Overall, it was fine, loved some parts and hated others. However, I definitely don't see how this would ever be elevated to the level of a "classic".
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe script started out after Zach Cregger read Gavin de Becker's book, "The Gift of Fear," which encourages women to trust their intuition when confronted by obviously dangerous men. He used it as a writing exercise and began crafting a thirty-minute short that consisted entirely of a conversation in which a woman continues to ignore a mounting series of red flags. He liked it well enough that he knew that he had the makings of a longer film and began conceptualizing a broader story for the characters.
- ErroresOne of the characters drives an electric Nissan Leaf, bizarrely it has engine and ignition sounds dubbed over its movement.
- Créditos curiososSPOILER: There are three mini-scenes after the initial smash cut to "Written & Directed by Zach Cregger" credit, showing Tess sitting up in the street, walking away from the bodies, and limping away from the water tower as dawn breaks.
- ConexionesFeatured in Chris Stuckmann Movie Reviews: Barbarian (2022)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Barbarian?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Barbarian
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 4,500,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 40,842,944
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 10,543,948
- 11 sep 2022
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 45,352,337
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 42min(102 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta