Agrega una trama en tu idiomaJo, Max, Gwen and Dave win the competition.Then they head off on an all expenses paid trip to New York, courtesy of the social network. As they board the private jet, they are asked to relin... Leer todoJo, Max, Gwen and Dave win the competition.Then they head off on an all expenses paid trip to New York, courtesy of the social network. As they board the private jet, they are asked to relinquish their mobile phones and take part in the in-flight entertainment - a new online gami... Leer todoJo, Max, Gwen and Dave win the competition.Then they head off on an all expenses paid trip to New York, courtesy of the social network. As they board the private jet, they are asked to relinquish their mobile phones and take part in the in-flight entertainment - a new online gaming experience.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Opiniones destacadas
For a low budget movie its a good effort.
The plot is in my opinion lacking, it leaves no room suspense to build up. Or to build any relationships between the characters or the viewer. Feels rushed. The story unfolds by itself, with little active choices.
The noname actors give a good performance, trying to make the most of it.
These other reviewers must be friends of the director or something giving it 10/10.
The film has much in common with your usual thriller in this mould and indeed one of the cast, Jack Gordon, would go on to be in the almost identical TRUTH OR DARE (which was much better, by the way). The usual problems unfold, namely poor scripting which takes the form of unlikeable cast members you either don't care about or actively wish bad stuff to happen to.
The low budget nature of the production precludes the presence of any name actors and the best they can come up with for a lead is a former EASTENDERS actress, Scarlett Alice Johnson. None of the actors are particularly bad, but they're not great either when saddled with such underwhelming characters. I appreciate that the emphasis is on the psychological here rather than unnecessary torture porn but the running time does drag and there's not much to get excited about when all is said and done.
I think there's been a lot of over-positive reviews which is perhaps a tad suspicious from people who've only ever reviewed one film ie this one, and then a few really quite nasty ones. I think the truth lies somewhere in between. For something low budget this is fine: I think it'll gain traction when it hits the £3 DVD barrier.
I like Brit horror and this is OK. 6 or 7 out of 10.
In that case, I have to say: well done !
It's not a great movie but it's a good one, which is impressive considering its kind and the fact that it's a low budget.
The premise seemed promising at the beginning, but everything started to fall off after about 15 minutes into the movie.
The acting is terrible; the characters aren't even remotely interesting. You can't sympathize or hate(for that matter) any of the characters.
The ending is absolutely meaningless! And when the credit rolls you involuntarily spit in your soda.
British cinema used to be great, but alas; it's gone Hollywood. We're all awaiting its return.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe jet is owned by "Deppart" Airlines - which is "Trapped" spelled backwards.
- ErroresAt around 43 mins, after a monitor is placed on the floor and while someone says "no no no no no" the boom mic is fully visible at the bottom of the screen.
- ConexionesReferences 2001. Odisea del espacio (1968)
Selecciones populares
- How long is Panic Button?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- GBP 300,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 36min(96 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1