CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.6/10
3.6 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Una mujer regresa a su hogar de la niñez para enfrentar a sus demonios internos y angustiada por una misteriosa enfermedad, luego de sobrevivir a una sobredosis descubre un demonio real.Una mujer regresa a su hogar de la niñez para enfrentar a sus demonios internos y angustiada por una misteriosa enfermedad, luego de sobrevivir a una sobredosis descubre un demonio real.Una mujer regresa a su hogar de la niñez para enfrentar a sus demonios internos y angustiada por una misteriosa enfermedad, luego de sobrevivir a una sobredosis descubre un demonio real.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
First off, Jemima Rooper is entirely awful to observe throughout the whole film. She's dreadful and not in a good way. She's a miserable, atrocious mess of a disaster from the start. The first third of the movie is all about her and her nasty habits and behavior.
Then she goes home to her mother, played by the always-awesome Kate Dickie. And then you kinda see why the daughter is a loathsome person. But by contrast, Kate Dickie can portray appalling without being unconscionably annoying.
Then it turns into a Village of the Wicker Song kinda thing, I guess. The reveal of what is going with the townspeople is a big "um, okay".
The special effects are cheesy in places.
The fudge looked good. Better than the film which, sadly, Kate Dickie can't save.
Then she goes home to her mother, played by the always-awesome Kate Dickie. And then you kinda see why the daughter is a loathsome person. But by contrast, Kate Dickie can portray appalling without being unconscionably annoying.
Then it turns into a Village of the Wicker Song kinda thing, I guess. The reveal of what is going with the townspeople is a big "um, okay".
The special effects are cheesy in places.
The fudge looked good. Better than the film which, sadly, Kate Dickie can't save.
Wasn't sure what to make of this, and in many ways it's a few different films put together. It's a mother/daughter relationship drama, it's an addiction drama, it's a folk horror and it's a body horror.
The actors are tremendous - Kate Dickie is always good value and is deliciously insincere.
Jemima Rooper manages to make a pretty unsympathetic character somewhat likeable, though that is a bit of a flaw in the film.
The cinematography is lovely - the British countryside has never looked so desolate or haunting.
The music and sound design is incredibly atmospheric, and works in conjunction with the editing to really keep you uneasy throughout.
Perhaps by the end of the film one too many ideas have been thrown into the pot, but I really enjoyed the journey and would happily recommend it.
The actors are tremendous - Kate Dickie is always good value and is deliciously insincere.
Jemima Rooper manages to make a pretty unsympathetic character somewhat likeable, though that is a bit of a flaw in the film.
The cinematography is lovely - the British countryside has never looked so desolate or haunting.
The music and sound design is incredibly atmospheric, and works in conjunction with the editing to really keep you uneasy throughout.
Perhaps by the end of the film one too many ideas have been thrown into the pot, but I really enjoyed the journey and would happily recommend it.
To get that out of the way .. i rate this movie to be a bit above average.
If i wanted to describe a feeling in one word .. i would probably go with : uncomfortable
A bit like a Lars von Trier movie, but only half way.
Acting is good - although not very nuanced. Cinematography is sometimes good .. but not stellar - and characters act in a very artificial way .. only to support the plot, not in any way realistic (on the basis of the supernatural that is going on)
The CGI was poor ... i mean, Playstation 2 cutscene poor. It was kind of rare .. and i wonder why the movie did not use practical effects .. those would not have been too hard .. and may not have broken immersion as much as those really terrible CGI scenes.
All in all, it was worth watching - for me. But other than that ... a fairly forgettable movie without much depth or meaning (well, unless you are into rural folklore of that region or so .. maybe than there is more to get from it)
If i wanted to describe a feeling in one word .. i would probably go with : uncomfortable
A bit like a Lars von Trier movie, but only half way.
Acting is good - although not very nuanced. Cinematography is sometimes good .. but not stellar - and characters act in a very artificial way .. only to support the plot, not in any way realistic (on the basis of the supernatural that is going on)
The CGI was poor ... i mean, Playstation 2 cutscene poor. It was kind of rare .. and i wonder why the movie did not use practical effects .. those would not have been too hard .. and may not have broken immersion as much as those really terrible CGI scenes.
All in all, it was worth watching - for me. But other than that ... a fairly forgettable movie without much depth or meaning (well, unless you are into rural folklore of that region or so .. maybe than there is more to get from it)
I thought this movie started out decently, but fell apart as things started to unfold, by the end leaving you questioning what you just watched.
It almost felt like the writers/ people Involved/ maybe even the actors were confused on what exactly this plot was. It was very successfully atmospheric and kept you engaged until the third act where things kind of went off the rails. It was all... kind of explained, yet still even after I was left asking why. I think the plot/script needed another couple once overs to really iron it out and make sure it made sense and was cohesive. Regardless, I thought the mother and daughter both did a solid job as far as acting goes with this and there was still some solid creep factor.
I felt this one had a lot more potential that it didn't quite tap into but was not overwhelmingly unsuccessful. Would recommend but not fervently.
It almost felt like the writers/ people Involved/ maybe even the actors were confused on what exactly this plot was. It was very successfully atmospheric and kept you engaged until the third act where things kind of went off the rails. It was all... kind of explained, yet still even after I was left asking why. I think the plot/script needed another couple once overs to really iron it out and make sure it made sense and was cohesive. Regardless, I thought the mother and daughter both did a solid job as far as acting goes with this and there was still some solid creep factor.
I felt this one had a lot more potential that it didn't quite tap into but was not overwhelmingly unsuccessful. Would recommend but not fervently.
Intriguing beginning. Story contains good mix of mystery with supernatural horror for the first 4/5ths, but the end and the story is very unsatisfactory. The draw-in is good but Is almost as if they ran out money and concluded amongst poor lighting and severely curtail final scenes. Another way to put it was that critical scenes near the end are missing. Also, on a fear/suspense scale it's falls flat all throughout. I enjoyed the pace of the mystery and unraveling backstory. The acting is ok to good. The few special effects probably were poor so they resolve it by by under exposing, the problem is that I couldn't tell what happened in the the in the climax and the parts we do see clearly, there's no explanation.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe film's original title was "Wormeater", but was changed to "Matriarch" after network executives felt it would put off the female audience.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Matriarch?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 25min(85 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta