CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.4/10
12 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Cuando un blogger de tecnología consigue una entrevista con un gurú de la tecnología y detiene un ataque contra él, encuentra un anillo misterioso que lo lleva 57 segundos al pasado.Cuando un blogger de tecnología consigue una entrevista con un gurú de la tecnología y detiene un ataque contra él, encuentra un anillo misterioso que lo lleva 57 segundos al pasado.Cuando un blogger de tecnología consigue una entrevista con un gurú de la tecnología y detiene un ataque contra él, encuentra un anillo misterioso que lo lleva 57 segundos al pasado.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
This movie is alright, but derivative.
If you like the concept, but want to see a much better movie, check out "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, 2010".
The acting is much better, but I don't want to totally dismiss this film.
The concept is top drawer! Combining AI with a time device, would be a total game changer.
The AI would detect danger at a speed humans aren't capable of, then throw you back 57 seconds to avoid the danger, either manually or by the AI.
It's a genius concept, used a lot in the film, less the AI, he does everything manually.
I would recommend this film on the concept alone, however, it's a waste of Morgan Freeman's talent.
But hey, everybody can use an extra paycheck, LOL!
If you like the concept, but want to see a much better movie, check out "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, 2010".
The acting is much better, but I don't want to totally dismiss this film.
The concept is top drawer! Combining AI with a time device, would be a total game changer.
The AI would detect danger at a speed humans aren't capable of, then throw you back 57 seconds to avoid the danger, either manually or by the AI.
It's a genius concept, used a lot in the film, less the AI, he does everything manually.
I would recommend this film on the concept alone, however, it's a waste of Morgan Freeman's talent.
But hey, everybody can use an extra paycheck, LOL!
Considering 57 Seconds has limited budget but attracting some good actors, that said a lot. The story has a lot of possiblity and potential, but quite a limited budget.
However, the director played it safe and made the story as enjoyable as possible. Boy met idol; boy got time jump back ring; boy met girl; boy met villains; boy got corrupted; boy broke up with girl; boy destroy villain for revenge; boy got invited to join conglomeracy; boy chose to stay sane and poor.
To submit with Hollywood formula: boy is white; girl is black; Morgan Freeman is the rich angel; villain is white; villain 's sidekicks are multi racial; showcase consumerism to the max with sport cars-private jet-privilege lifestyle.
What can go wrong? Well, it makes 57 Seconds became an average B movie, with better special effects and cool rental vehicles. In short, an average action flick.
However, the director played it safe and made the story as enjoyable as possible. Boy met idol; boy got time jump back ring; boy met girl; boy met villains; boy got corrupted; boy broke up with girl; boy destroy villain for revenge; boy got invited to join conglomeracy; boy chose to stay sane and poor.
To submit with Hollywood formula: boy is white; girl is black; Morgan Freeman is the rich angel; villain is white; villain 's sidekicks are multi racial; showcase consumerism to the max with sport cars-private jet-privilege lifestyle.
What can go wrong? Well, it makes 57 Seconds became an average B movie, with better special effects and cool rental vehicles. In short, an average action flick.
Sure you have the legendary Morgan Freeman sandwiched in here at the beginning and end, but even he's a lost cause in this flick. Also all the action scenes are laughable. We've all seen movies with large fireball explosion where characters have to quickly run away, or instances where guns are pointed at someone's head, and times where someone gets knocked out, drugged or kidnapped.
I think the writers missed out on the element of flashback - perhaps show some scenes of Franklin's twin sister, so that we can unravel how close the siblings were and how her passing affected his life. Franklin really is a poor character because we can't tell if his heart is in the right place. He is labeled as heroic, but most of the time he uses the ring for personal gain (to gamble) and not for the greater good.
This film is neither bold nor intrepid, and Josh Hutchinson does the bare minimum here. I don't think he's cut out for an action thriller.
I think the writers missed out on the element of flashback - perhaps show some scenes of Franklin's twin sister, so that we can unravel how close the siblings were and how her passing affected his life. Franklin really is a poor character because we can't tell if his heart is in the right place. He is labeled as heroic, but most of the time he uses the ring for personal gain (to gamble) and not for the greater good.
This film is neither bold nor intrepid, and Josh Hutchinson does the bare minimum here. I don't think he's cut out for an action thriller.
Wow. I'm mind-blown.
Do you know when you are watching a science fiction movie or any movie really and you have those moments of amazement thinking "Wow! I feel like I'm getting smarter after every scene!", "This is so well written!" "This is so ingenious!"? Well, unfortunately, the complete opposite just happened...
It's remarkable how the decision makers involved in this project were able to set up this big scope involving as characters apparently two of the worlds most influential beings, the tech genius entrepreneur! And the pharmaceutical giant!, with the MIT graduate 'chosen one'!, and the movie be so ridden by basically idiotic/childish decisions and set ups. Everything just feels relentlessly cheap. How contradictory.
How to suspend your disbelief when the movie is set within such a wealthy and high-stakes scenario but you have everything surrounding your production (except Morgan Freeman) being not up to par? It just makes no sense.
Next time just tune/humble the whole thing down so that you don't have to simplify every plot point because you don't have the budget or the technical team/energy to make it.
Do you know when you are watching a science fiction movie or any movie really and you have those moments of amazement thinking "Wow! I feel like I'm getting smarter after every scene!", "This is so well written!" "This is so ingenious!"? Well, unfortunately, the complete opposite just happened...
It's remarkable how the decision makers involved in this project were able to set up this big scope involving as characters apparently two of the worlds most influential beings, the tech genius entrepreneur! And the pharmaceutical giant!, with the MIT graduate 'chosen one'!, and the movie be so ridden by basically idiotic/childish decisions and set ups. Everything just feels relentlessly cheap. How contradictory.
How to suspend your disbelief when the movie is set within such a wealthy and high-stakes scenario but you have everything surrounding your production (except Morgan Freeman) being not up to par? It just makes no sense.
Next time just tune/humble the whole thing down so that you don't have to simplify every plot point because you don't have the budget or the technical team/energy to make it.
I didn't like anything about this picture save maybe the possible potential for the story line. There were really no redeeming features to this film that I could find at any point during the development of the story. The main characters portrayal of his stupidity was only exceeded by his bad acting in general. In fact none of the characters had any credibility at all throughout.
The last scene in the aircraft was really pathetic from all aspects of this production.
The director should definitely keep his day job. I'm not a Hollywood critic just someone who has over many decades discovered what is a good movie from a bad movie.
Especially when one of my favorite actors Mr Morgan Freeman is involved.
He is far too good an actor to have been associated with this production at all.
Why he would have taken on this project to begin with is mystery to me?
The last scene in the aircraft was really pathetic from all aspects of this production.
The director should definitely keep his day job. I'm not a Hollywood critic just someone who has over many decades discovered what is a good movie from a bad movie.
Especially when one of my favorite actors Mr Morgan Freeman is involved.
He is far too good an actor to have been associated with this production at all.
Why he would have taken on this project to begin with is mystery to me?
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe film was shot in Lafayette, LA in April 2022.
- ErroresAt Cogan's grille the audience is told that a bullet grazed Franklin's right hand. It was bleeding at the conference too. Yet, when he takes off the bandage, his hand is completely fine.
- Citas
Franklin Fox: They say that life flashes before your eyes when you have a near-death experience, but I only saw my last three months.
- Bandas sonorasCreepin
Written by Cade Ellis
Performed by Cade Ellis
Produced by Oscar Beats
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is 57 Seconds?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- 57 Seconds
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 1,055,487
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 39min(99 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta