CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.4/10
12 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Cuando un blogger de tecnología consigue una entrevista con un gurú de la tecnología y detiene un ataque contra él, encuentra un anillo misterioso que lo lleva 57 segundos al pasado.Cuando un blogger de tecnología consigue una entrevista con un gurú de la tecnología y detiene un ataque contra él, encuentra un anillo misterioso que lo lleva 57 segundos al pasado.Cuando un blogger de tecnología consigue una entrevista con un gurú de la tecnología y detiene un ataque contra él, encuentra un anillo misterioso que lo lleva 57 segundos al pasado.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I don't know how the team that made the movie managed to land Morgan Freeman on their lap. Whoever made that happen is the only genius on the team.
Everything else is absolutely dumb and/or low quality about this movie.
The main characters make the dumbest decisions possible. Their reasoning makes no sense.
From the cinematography perspective, it's just awful. Most outdoor scenes are way too contrasty with blown shadows. It's like they hired a team of first year art school students and put them in charge of lighting and the camera.
Audio is awful too. Many indoor scenes echo like crazy.
Zero attention to details.
Do not recommend.
3/10.
Everything else is absolutely dumb and/or low quality about this movie.
The main characters make the dumbest decisions possible. Their reasoning makes no sense.
From the cinematography perspective, it's just awful. Most outdoor scenes are way too contrasty with blown shadows. It's like they hired a team of first year art school students and put them in charge of lighting and the camera.
Audio is awful too. Many indoor scenes echo like crazy.
Zero attention to details.
Do not recommend.
3/10.
This movie is alright, but derivative.
If you like the concept, but want to see a much better movie, check out "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, 2010".
The acting is much better, but I don't want to totally dismiss this film.
The concept is top drawer! Combining AI with a time device, would be a total game changer.
The AI would detect danger at a speed humans aren't capable of, then throw you back 57 seconds to avoid the danger, either manually or by the AI.
It's a genius concept, used a lot in the film, less the AI, he does everything manually.
I would recommend this film on the concept alone, however, it's a waste of Morgan Freeman's talent.
But hey, everybody can use an extra paycheck, LOL!
If you like the concept, but want to see a much better movie, check out "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, 2010".
The acting is much better, but I don't want to totally dismiss this film.
The concept is top drawer! Combining AI with a time device, would be a total game changer.
The AI would detect danger at a speed humans aren't capable of, then throw you back 57 seconds to avoid the danger, either manually or by the AI.
It's a genius concept, used a lot in the film, less the AI, he does everything manually.
I would recommend this film on the concept alone, however, it's a waste of Morgan Freeman's talent.
But hey, everybody can use an extra paycheck, LOL!
While 57 Seconds had its fun moments, some cliche ideas let the movie down. It is not the best movie out there, but it is entertaining in it's own way and had the potential to have been better than what was released. Morgan Freeman is still a great actor that can make a bad movie look good with his topnotch acting. Josh Hutcherson did a great job too and I'll definitely love to see him in big budget movies. Nonetheless, 57 Seconds is a movie that contains a good dose of entertainment, a few laughing moment here and there and some solid acting. The story should have just been able to give us more.
Sure you have the legendary Morgan Freeman sandwiched in here at the beginning and end, but even he's a lost cause in this flick. Also all the action scenes are laughable. We've all seen movies with large fireball explosion where characters have to quickly run away, or instances where guns are pointed at someone's head, and times where someone gets knocked out, drugged or kidnapped.
I think the writers missed out on the element of flashback - perhaps show some scenes of Franklin's twin sister, so that we can unravel how close the siblings were and how her passing affected his life. Franklin really is a poor character because we can't tell if his heart is in the right place. He is labeled as heroic, but most of the time he uses the ring for personal gain (to gamble) and not for the greater good.
This film is neither bold nor intrepid, and Josh Hutchinson does the bare minimum here. I don't think he's cut out for an action thriller.
I think the writers missed out on the element of flashback - perhaps show some scenes of Franklin's twin sister, so that we can unravel how close the siblings were and how her passing affected his life. Franklin really is a poor character because we can't tell if his heart is in the right place. He is labeled as heroic, but most of the time he uses the ring for personal gain (to gamble) and not for the greater good.
This film is neither bold nor intrepid, and Josh Hutchinson does the bare minimum here. I don't think he's cut out for an action thriller.
One of those films that's not a bad watch if you can't find anything else.
Yeah, it has a bit of a stupid plot, but if you just look at it from the point of view of a bit of innocent sci-fi fun, then it's an OK watch to pass the time.
The script could have been more solid, it definitely felt rushed and like it could have used another draft or two.
Isn't really any rewatch value there for me, it's a one and done type film.
Just don't go into it expecting an avant-garde sci-fi masterpiece and take it for what it is. People are judging way too seriously in these reviews. It's not trying to be Oscar-worthy, it's just a breezy sci-fi thriller.
Yeah, it has a bit of a stupid plot, but if you just look at it from the point of view of a bit of innocent sci-fi fun, then it's an OK watch to pass the time.
The script could have been more solid, it definitely felt rushed and like it could have used another draft or two.
Isn't really any rewatch value there for me, it's a one and done type film.
Just don't go into it expecting an avant-garde sci-fi masterpiece and take it for what it is. People are judging way too seriously in these reviews. It's not trying to be Oscar-worthy, it's just a breezy sci-fi thriller.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe film was shot in Lafayette, LA in April 2022.
- ErroresAt Cogan's grille the audience is told that a bullet grazed Franklin's right hand. It was bleeding at the conference too. Yet, when he takes off the bandage, his hand is completely fine.
- Citas
Franklin Fox: They say that life flashes before your eyes when you have a near-death experience, but I only saw my last three months.
- Bandas sonorasCreepin
Written by Cade Ellis
Performed by Cade Ellis
Produced by Oscar Beats
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is 57 Seconds?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- 57 Seconds
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 1,055,487
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 39min(99 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta