1923

Look, I understand that there was certainly abuse associated with the schools set up to teach native American children English and try to get them to acculturate. And that we figured out a while ago that was not appropriate. But... the utter, 100% EVIL of every single nun and priest depicted is troubling. Really - not a single one had the tiniest inclination towards kindness? I mean, you can identify far better with the other villains of the story: at least they are somewhat understandable. The nuns and priests are straight out demons, and that plot line is really hard to watch.

1923 is the next prequel to Yellowstone after 1883 and like those two shows this is just as incredible! As a huge fan of those two shows I was really looking forward to this and it did not disappoint. It continues to follow the Dutton family and show how they created the Yellowstone ranch. This obviously takes place in 1923 during prohibition and the Great Depression. It's another gritty western from Taylor Sheridan. Sheridan is one of the best things going on television right now, everything he touches turns to gold. Just look at his resume (Yellowstone, 1883, Mayor of Kingstown, Tulsa King, Sicario, Hell or High Water, etc.). Harrison Ford and Helen Mirren lead an amazing cast who are all at their best here. Season 2 just ended recently and I'd be shocked if this show doesn't end up at least getting nominated for numerous awards.

I generally like Sheridan's because they present multiple viewpoints, we don't necessarily have to agree with. 1883 was a knockout, for story-telling, history, and character development.

1923 would have been even better than 1883 if not for the gratuitous snuff porn. I'm not talking about the usual sexual violence women face from day to day, as reasonably portrayed in this series, but about Whitman's appetites specifically.

We already know Whitman is a sociopath without any boundaries or redeeming features. Negatives about any character are easy to portray offscreen (assuming they are even necessary). Filming the snuff-porn and giving viewers no option to view a less offensive version does absolutely nothing to advance the plot, or improve the Sheridan brand.

In my opinion 1923 and 1883 both surpass Yellowstone.

Good actors, good direction and better writing. Taylor Sheridan just keeps doing better stuff!

While even reusing some of the plot of the original 1923 make it more grandiose. The African story is majestic and the Native Americans dark history isn't hidden nor diminished.

I remember watching the movie The Culpepper Cattle Co back in the day (1972) and wishing that American Westerns added a bit more realism and a sense of history. Sadly even to this day we get your Doris Day girl next door and Audie Murphy type offerings I tried Yellowstone and didnt like it. My Wife refused to watch anymore of 1883 as she said there was too much talking.

1923 on the other hand is a gem. It gives you a real sense of how the West was and how it transitioned into the 20th century. From the plight of the Indians to the hardships the farmers endured it was all there. It gave me insights that I as a European had no knowledge of.

I thought the acting was excellent even if some characters have been heavily criticised.

Alex's portrayal of a spoilt English aristocrat was annoyingly spot on even if her accent at times was dreadful. Helen Mirren's Irish accent was dreadful but her acting was excellent as was Harrison Fords. My wife hated Timothy Daltons character saying he was wicked and evil so he got that spot on. Jerome Flynn was the stand out performance for me personally. Oh almost forgot Spencer Brandon Sklenar) , one for the ladies to swoon over. I could go on but I am no film buff. Just wanted to do a brief review and say if you haven't watched it you should . It wont disappoint.