CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.4/10
7.6 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Tras sufrir una tragedia a manos de soldados invasores en Donbás, un profesor de física ucraniano busca venganza. Pone sus ojos en un francotirador ruso de élite cuya eliminación podría camb... Leer todoTras sufrir una tragedia a manos de soldados invasores en Donbás, un profesor de física ucraniano busca venganza. Pone sus ojos en un francotirador ruso de élite cuya eliminación podría cambiar el rumbo del conflicto.Tras sufrir una tragedia a manos de soldados invasores en Donbás, un profesor de física ucraniano busca venganza. Pone sus ojos en un francotirador ruso de élite cuya eliminación podría cambiar el rumbo del conflicto.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 3 nominaciones en total
Andrey Mostrenko
- Cap
- (as Andriy Mostrenko)
Vadim Lyalko
- Commander of the GRU (Buryy)
- (as Vadym Lyalko)
Vadim Kurilko
- Hyurza
- (as Vadym Kurylko)
Eugen Volosheniuk
- Batyanya
- (as Yevhen Voloshenyuk)
Zachary Shadrin
- Taras
- (as Zakhar Shadrin)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
The intro claims this movie is based on a true story, but I have no idea to what extent. That said, it's a pretty well-made movie. It was made in 2021, well before the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, and is based around the 2014 annexation of the Crimea by Russia.
The main protagonist, the titular Raven, played by Aldoshyn Pavlo, does a very good job of portraying the impact of such conflict, with transition from pacifist to war hero. The other really good performance is from Andrey Mostrenko, who plays Raven's commanding officer.
The sniper scenes are well shot and credible. The sound effects are on point too.
The movie paints a bleak picture of war and there's nothing glitzy and shiny about it. Men killing men in bleak conditions.
Well worth watching.
The main protagonist, the titular Raven, played by Aldoshyn Pavlo, does a very good job of portraying the impact of such conflict, with transition from pacifist to war hero. The other really good performance is from Andrey Mostrenko, who plays Raven's commanding officer.
The sniper scenes are well shot and credible. The sound effects are on point too.
The movie paints a bleak picture of war and there's nothing glitzy and shiny about it. Men killing men in bleak conditions.
Well worth watching.
Maybe that movie is not truly documental but it's close to what really happened and it's even more close to what we Ukrainian really feel.
All bad rate from russian b..tards😉
All bad rate from russian b..tards😉
Starts out bizarrely, a teacher and his wife are living the ultimate hippy lifestyle off the grid, maybe this is more prevalent than I've been exposed to, but for the movie, it just seems weird and pointless.
The news reports on them for a sensation piece presumably, but doesn't immediately follow up after his wife is killed..... odd.
It's a great motive for joining a military, but he simply doesn't fit in, and the training, if you want to call it that, is on par with kids playing, but with real guns.
There is literally 2 training scenes on the range, and we're off to fight the war.... except hero boy doesn't bother to listen to his commander, because he's got a good shot on 2 random fighters. Never mind that the commander knows why they're out there, looking for the enemy snipers, but nope, blown away because hero boy couldn't keep his round in his rifle.
Jump to our hero immediately somehow being the go to guy for sniping.... and now he's of course refilling his own ammunition and everything..... So either the pacing of the movie is terrible, and a fair amount of time has passed without any indication of such, or it's just a terrible script.
I'm suspecting it's the latter, since randomly hero boy who didn't seem to get along with his 5 classmates (though he also didn't seem to not get along with them either, there was next to zero emotions showed either way). When two of them went on a mission, off screen and unbeknownst to the viewers, he starts asking about them multiple times, awkwardly. Only for one of them to be dead of course. But wait.... here comes more lack of any emotion...
It ended quite predictably, not a bad thing, but also not riveting.
For the life of me I cannot figure out why they were constantly loading their first round by hand, when the rifles were all magazine fed, unless it's for that one extra round of capacity, than that's fine, but other than that, it makes no sense to do it. I've served in the Canadian military and fired an assortment of weapons, semi auto, full auto, belt fed, mag fed. Never any sniper rifles, so maybe snipers do have a reason for it, just seems unlikely though, and that it was added by someone unfamiliar with weapons.
Oh and to say it's a political statement or propaganda movie, meh, almost every movie is to some extent, even children's cartoons, this one just happens to be a current issue one. It doesn't even detract from the movie.
The news reports on them for a sensation piece presumably, but doesn't immediately follow up after his wife is killed..... odd.
It's a great motive for joining a military, but he simply doesn't fit in, and the training, if you want to call it that, is on par with kids playing, but with real guns.
There is literally 2 training scenes on the range, and we're off to fight the war.... except hero boy doesn't bother to listen to his commander, because he's got a good shot on 2 random fighters. Never mind that the commander knows why they're out there, looking for the enemy snipers, but nope, blown away because hero boy couldn't keep his round in his rifle.
Jump to our hero immediately somehow being the go to guy for sniping.... and now he's of course refilling his own ammunition and everything..... So either the pacing of the movie is terrible, and a fair amount of time has passed without any indication of such, or it's just a terrible script.
I'm suspecting it's the latter, since randomly hero boy who didn't seem to get along with his 5 classmates (though he also didn't seem to not get along with them either, there was next to zero emotions showed either way). When two of them went on a mission, off screen and unbeknownst to the viewers, he starts asking about them multiple times, awkwardly. Only for one of them to be dead of course. But wait.... here comes more lack of any emotion...
It ended quite predictably, not a bad thing, but also not riveting.
For the life of me I cannot figure out why they were constantly loading their first round by hand, when the rifles were all magazine fed, unless it's for that one extra round of capacity, than that's fine, but other than that, it makes no sense to do it. I've served in the Canadian military and fired an assortment of weapons, semi auto, full auto, belt fed, mag fed. Never any sniper rifles, so maybe snipers do have a reason for it, just seems unlikely though, and that it was added by someone unfamiliar with weapons.
Oh and to say it's a political statement or propaganda movie, meh, almost every movie is to some extent, even children's cartoons, this one just happens to be a current issue one. It doesn't even detract from the movie.
Pavlo Aldoshyn gives a convincing performance as a Ukrainian sniper in their war with Russia. After a overly sweet ten minutes or so of little house on the prairie, the film gets down to brass tacks as we follow Pavlo's character going from Michael Langdon to Arnold Schwarzenegger. He learns to be a sniper to get revenge on the Russians. The training segment is interesting.
Although the Ukrainians have inferior tech for scope rifles, they get the job done most of time due to their discipline and controlled hatred of the invader. Some of the segments of the Russians getting drilled are quite satisfying. Worth viewing.
Although the Ukrainians have inferior tech for scope rifles, they get the job done most of time due to their discipline and controlled hatred of the invader. Some of the segments of the Russians getting drilled are quite satisfying. Worth viewing.
Snipers shooting foreign invaders trying to steal their country throughout the movie.
Loved every moment of the movie 9/10. I truly Hope for a part 2 coming out soon.
Loved every moment of the movie 9/10. I truly Hope for a part 2 coming out soon.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThis gritty and evocative film follows a physics teacher in the Donbas region who suffers a family tragedy at the hands of invading Russian troops. The ex-pacifist joins the army as an unconventional sniper determined to gain revenge and defend the future of his country.
It was created with support from the Ukrainian State Film Agency, was co-written by Mykola Voronin - the real-life sniper whose story is portrayed - and features about 100 members of the Ukrainian armed forces and national guard. Even aside from those career military personnel, several of the main cast members are currently fighting on the front lines.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Sniper. The White Raven?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- EUR 997,800 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 881
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 881
- 3 jul 2022
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 6,105
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 51 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for El francotirador de Dombás (2022)?
Responda