Frontier

This is an excellent documentary.

I felt it dispelled many myths about the West, especially cowboys. Yes, as another reviewer mentioned, a white guilt-trip (deservedly), but "History is not there for you to like or dislike. It's there for you to learn from". Loved all the maps and re-enactments. Only complaint is such small writing when explaining interviewee's name and occupation, but many documentaries make that mistake. Guess I need a 70" television! Sure do wish they'd shown documentaries like this in history class when I was in school years and years ago. Really makes it easy to understand the timelines and makes history feel real. I'm hoping creators of this series make more.

The history of how the United States came to be is a complex task to present, and even though Frontier claims to bring us 'the true story', six episodes of 40+ minutes just isn't enough. Like in most historical documentary series, there are a number of hand picked people to tell the tale, basically historians who have proved to cover a special part of history in an authentical fashion. Much of what is presented is very interesting and actual, such as the links between the Mexican American War, the California Gold Rush and the Civil War, or the demythification of the cowboy life, and the horrors of indigenous children in the boarding schools, to name three outstanding factors together with the final historical conclusion. However, some of the tales contain obvious errors, and when they all are illustrated with poorly and amateurishly made dramatizations, where the same slow mo clips and scenes are used over and over in different episodes, this sadly spoils the total fundamentaly.

A highly biased, highly opinionated, one-sided, shallow, and not very thought-provoking viewpoint of the formative years of the United States of America. Virtually every "historian" or "subject matter expert" featured has at least one axe to grind against America and an overwhelming interest in communicating only their narrow, anti-American perspective of the evils of American history. There is always more than one viewpoint when interpreting history, but unfortunately, this "documentary" is too intellectually lazy to even offer up lip service to the importance of the life risking achievements and incredible sacrifices of the individual in America's westward expansion and the creation of American exceptionalism. This "documentary" simply focuses on the conspiratorial evils of the American elites and the America government in the country's westward expansion and sees those everyday individuals who actually risked everything - including their very lives - to make it happen as little more that useful idiots. Mix in heavy doses of the evils of slavery, genocide and rampant capitalism and you have a leftist feast on anti-American hate.

This series is not really about the wild frontier or the birth of a nation, but rather all the evil things white men did to natives and slaves. You learn very little about history and even the civil war is condensed to a 5 minute clip where we are mostly reminded about the massacre of a couple hundred indians. Really? Over 600.000 casualties during the war and this incident that wasn't even a footnote in the bigger picture gets the limelight? It seems that nothing positive happened after the independence struggle. It was all murder and mayhem. Really sad viewing really, a white guilt trip at most.

I'm looking at this series from an European perspective. My local streaming provider picked up this series, and I started watching it without really knowing what I was getting into. It took a while to understand.

This series is really a collection of 10-15 academics reviewing major points of the expansion of the United States. The director of the series has made it a point to go in depth on three different perspectives: The perspective of the colonizers of the US, the point of view of the indigenous population, and the view of the enslaved Africans. Each point of view is given equal weight. The brutality of the creation of the US is heavily underscored. For some viewers, this might be uncomfortable viewing. But with such a breadth of historians, the facts presented appear to be very solid.

The director of the series has done a good job of organizing the subject matter, so it's easy to follow. The narration between the interview clips is well done in summarizing and connecting. So far so good.

The main weakness in this series is the dramatization that is used to illustrate the dialogue. This weakness becomes obvious rather quickly. The dramatizations are of a very general nature, and not specific to the events that are being talked about. And soon, these scenes are recycled, so you get the same shots of people walking through western towns, indians on horseback, and African Americans working in the fields. In fact, the series would be better without the use of these scenes at all.

There really is a disconnect between the thoughtful presentation of the material in terms of organizing and selecting and connecting the historians' account, and the lackluster use of "reenactments".

It is often said that history is written by the victors. This series really does a good job of rectifying that, and as such is worthwhile watching, even with its flaws. Some of the professors we get to see are better storytellers than others. Kevin Waite of Durham University stood out to me with his sharp and focused comments.