Cut!

This movie is really bad. The high points probably comes from cast and crew conducting some sort of pre-internet-release internet-campaign. Kudos to them and well done. You fooled me!

The acting is pretty bad, the editing is actually okay but the script/story and directing is just infantile. It's like a less-than-bright adolescent wrote the script, trying to sort of copy the gist of other horror movies, not paying any attention to details or believability of characters or story-progression. It's just a big mess, to sum it up in one sentence. The music was really good though... but probably because it was taken from Stanley Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket.

It's rare I find a thriller/horror film that wraps me in and keeps me enticed. CUT! brings you a clever, smart, witty and entertaining horror flick that will leave you guessing all the way through. Brilliant performance from David Banks in the lead and David Rountree is equally as captivating. Rountree leaves an impressive directorial mark with excellent casting and superb performances. Locations, shot selection, and scene choices came together very well allowing the story to unfold with a stylistic classy touch. The score and post effects were spot on and we all know so much of a good horror flick relies on great audio. CUT! shows you that amazing work can be done with the right people, the right attitude, the right planning and a little bit of capitol.

When I saw the excellent ratings and reviews for this movie I was quite excited about seeing it as I haven't seen a good horror in a while. After just 5 minutes into the film I couldn't believe I was watching the same movie as all the other reviewers that had given it 10 stars.

The acting was soooo bad, the plot was terrible and after about 25 minutes I started to fast forward to see if I was imagining it. No I wasn't, every time I pressed play all I got was the same crappy acting and the same annoying characters that I did in the first 5 minutes.

I would like to see more HONEST reviews about this movie on here just to prove to me it's not me who is losing it and it is in fact the awful film. If it continues to get 10 stars from every quarter then I will try and watch it again to see what I missed!

I opened an IMDb account especially to warn people from this waste of time.

All the rest of the reviews are by the cast and makers of the film. Actually calling it a film is doing the cinema wrong, it really is more like a student film. A bad, long, boring student film you just wished you haven't watched.

If you love the Horror Genre, I invite you to write an honest review as well (after trying to see the movie of course) just so other fans wouldn't have to go through the disappointment of finding out this movie's rating (7.4 at the time this review was written) is misleading.

I didn't manage to get through the first half an hour. Those who can, please contact your doctor. You have Alzheimer.

I found paying attention to this tiresome and a challenge, a challenge I apparently could not conquer cause I'm pretty sure a spent more time daydreaming than being entertained by this film. The acting was average for a low budget and I am not reviewing to actor bash and I think the actors were fine and it was just the dialog they were handed along with the execution as a whole that just built no suspense to allow viewers to connect to the characters or the film as a whole. It simply failed to pull me in. With that said I thought perhaps it was just my mood so I took a second attempt and my opinion hasn't changed. The fake reviews on here are so misleading, no way people are giving this a 10 star unless involved in the film themselves which is sad because if the film was at all descent it would get 5-6 star average on it's own which for the horror genre is good on here and rating this a 10 star isn't gonna magically make the movie good, if anything it raise expectations and leaves viewers even more disappointed than they originally would be after watching.