CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
8.1/10
872
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Maestros del cine y expertos en el género celebran los momentos más terroríficos de las mejores películas de terror, explorando cómo se crearon estas escenas y por qué se grabaron a fuego en... Leer todoMaestros del cine y expertos en el género celebran los momentos más terroríficos de las mejores películas de terror, explorando cómo se crearon estas escenas y por qué se grabaron a fuego en el cerebro de los espectadores.Maestros del cine y expertos en el género celebran los momentos más terroríficos de las mejores películas de terror, explorando cómo se crearon estas escenas y por qué se grabaron a fuego en el cerebro de los espectadores.
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
2acw3
This series, or any series that purports to review productions of this type, is filled with bogus opinions and conclusions. People who participate in the production, writing, directing, etc., of these types of films are selling "snake oil". Films of this genre are not special because of the content they exhibit. Some of these films are good, some are not. But anyone who assigns special qualities to these films in particular moments and describing them as terrific plots or acting, or directing is selling hypocrisy, among other questionable traits. These films are famous for one or two reasons: They are gross and they make money. The acting and the plot are inconsequential. They show blood, guts, horrific special effects and women with cute bodies and that's all; these qualities do not make them special in their impact on the audience. What about a hypothetical movie titled, "Vomitus"? Extraterrestrials land on Earth and spread a virus that causes people to vomit endlessly. They can't stop. They vomit until their stomachs are empty, then vomit their internal organs, then die. How's that for a scary plot? Would such a film be described as a terrific work of art? Would critics be thrilled to see the production value put into such a film? How about another hypothetical film titled, "Fecalmania"? Extraterrestrials land on Earth and spread a virus that causes people to relieve themselves non-stop until they die from losing their internal organs. Would the critics applaud the special effects and the acting in such a film? Of course they would. This is the horror genre at its next level. This is pushing the envelope. This is exploring the next dimension in storytelling. Critics would love the plot and acting in "Vomitus" and "Fecalmania". This is where the horror genre is headed. Won't audiences love the movie? The excitement, the fear, the tension, the vomit and the feces and the stench? Won't people line up to see the movies? Maybe even a second time. The acting would be superb! The plot would be superb! Wouldn't you want to see it, maybe twice? Imagine the endless scenes of people vomiting or people defecating. This is "Night of the Living Dead", only better, right? Of course! And how about the sequels? People who are forced to eat their own or someone else's vomit or feces! WOW! What a breakthrough! How soon can we see the them? Well, that's too long!
101 SHMOAT follows the well-worn VH1 formula of a whole lot of clips and a few talking heads. Occasionally, we're treated to people involved in making the films being showcased, and they always have something interesting to say. More often, we get to listen to people without much in the way of qualification, who want to tell us that Last House on the Left is somehow a moving work of art rather than classic exploitation, or that "it was all a dream" is something to love rather than lazy writing. But hey, Joe Bob Briggs is always awesome.
Films showcased are well curated. There don't seem to be any paid promotions here, and we're talking about a time period spanning Nostradamus to, I dunno, Autopsy of Jane Doe. While I wasn't a fan of every film featured, I know that tastes vary greatly *especially* within this genre, and films typically deserved their place on this list.
While we listen to the talking heads, we get to see good clips of good films, and there's nothing wrong with that. Sometimes, I was reminded of the greatness of a film I loved long ago, to which I hadn't devoted enough recent thought. A few times, I was introduced to a film I hadn't even heard of, and took a mental note to give it a watch.
If your well of horror is running dry, you'd probably get more out of this than on taking a chance on some cast-review-bombed Amazon Prime crapola. And, who knows, you might even discover a few gems.
There is one warning which may be very important to some people: the films are *thoroughly* spoiled in discussion. Personally, especially having seen most of these films, I think that's a wise choice; you really can't say much about a film without accepting spoilage, and I don't find that being spoiled makes me enjoy great films any less. But for those who care about spoilers, and haven't seen many of these films, you might want to take a pass on this series.
Films showcased are well curated. There don't seem to be any paid promotions here, and we're talking about a time period spanning Nostradamus to, I dunno, Autopsy of Jane Doe. While I wasn't a fan of every film featured, I know that tastes vary greatly *especially* within this genre, and films typically deserved their place on this list.
While we listen to the talking heads, we get to see good clips of good films, and there's nothing wrong with that. Sometimes, I was reminded of the greatness of a film I loved long ago, to which I hadn't devoted enough recent thought. A few times, I was introduced to a film I hadn't even heard of, and took a mental note to give it a watch.
If your well of horror is running dry, you'd probably get more out of this than on taking a chance on some cast-review-bombed Amazon Prime crapola. And, who knows, you might even discover a few gems.
There is one warning which may be very important to some people: the films are *thoroughly* spoiled in discussion. Personally, especially having seen most of these films, I think that's a wise choice; you really can't say much about a film without accepting spoilage, and I don't find that being spoiled makes me enjoy great films any less. But for those who care about spoilers, and haven't seen many of these films, you might want to take a pass on this series.
I went in expecting this to play like the old "100 Scariest Movie Moments" I saw on YouTube, but this is different. The commentary goes a lot deeper, with directors like Edgar Wright and Fede Alvarez and film scholars (mostly very smart women) giving some great analysis of how successful horror scenes are constructed. There's also a lot of cross-referencing to other films, some in the genre and some not, and some of the connections are surprising. (For example, Wright compares a scary practical effect from the po-faced film The Witch to the Hammer camp classic Captain Kronos, Vampire Hunter. Wright also gives the funniest breakdown of Hellraiser I have ever heard.) The list is very eclectic and I get the feeling the ratings aren't meant to be taken seriously, which is fine because what scares people is so different from person to person -- my mother was terrified by Jaws and I'm kinda, yeah, I guess so? -- but I thought Sinister was scary and she thought it was "formulaic" and the monster was "uninspired," so there you have it. The numbering is probably a gimmick to get you watching, but I guess it worked because I am watching and liking it. 101 clips from horror films, some that I like and some I don't like, but the pace is fast so it doesn't take long to get to the next one. Good guests, good gender balance, really well-made. Perfect for Halloween. Love it.
I enjoy the classic formula they are using my only complaint is that the episodes are too short it feels like as soon as you are settled into each episode it just abruptly ends. Not to nitpick but it is super clean compared to the original it lacks that Gothic punk feel that the original had that just gets you so pumped up to watch horror movies. Also loved all the random people they had on the Original show you never know who you'd see each segment, this is kind of the same few people , mainly some real new age actresses I've never even heard of. But looking forward to each episode! Apparently it needs to be 600 words to submit so just ignore this sentence.
Overall, I thought it was a really good list. I enjoyed watching the commentators whether it was a fellow actor, director, or film critic give their take on the movies. Just like with Eli Roth's History of Horror, the series will show small clips of other films while commenting on another film. I didn't care where on the list some of the movies or moments made it, it was just fun to watch. And you get introduced to films that you haven't seen before. And for me, I was reminded of old films that I had forgotten about. I started adding the films that they highlighted to my watch list. I recommend it.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAt the end of the whole documentary, during flashbacks, there was a scene from the movie Near Dark. Why wasn't A) this moment included in the documentary? And B) another dismissal of one the most underrated vampire movies of all time! The movie was also the original coined term "how do you like them apples?"! Look it up.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does The 101 Scariest Horror Movie Moments of All Time have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- 101 самый страшный момент из фильмов ужасов
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta