Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

Latency

  • 2024
  • PG-13
  • 1h 34min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.2/10
3 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Sasha Luss in Latency (2024)
When Hana, a professional gamer who suffers from acute agoraphobia, receives new equipment that enhances her game, she begins to wonder if it is reading her mind - or controlling it.
Reproducir trailer2:31
1 video
41 fotos
AcciónCiencia FicciónTerrorThriller

Cuando Hana, una jugadora profesional que sufre de agorafobia aguda, recibe un nuevo equipo que mejora su juego, comienza a preguntarse si está leyendo su mente o controlándola.Cuando Hana, una jugadora profesional que sufre de agorafobia aguda, recibe un nuevo equipo que mejora su juego, comienza a preguntarse si está leyendo su mente o controlándola.Cuando Hana, una jugadora profesional que sufre de agorafobia aguda, recibe un nuevo equipo que mejora su juego, comienza a preguntarse si está leyendo su mente o controlándola.

  • Dirección
    • James Croke
  • Guionista
    • James Croke
  • Elenco
    • Sasha Luss
    • Alexis Ren
    • Robert Coleby
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    4.2/10
    3 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • James Croke
    • Guionista
      • James Croke
    • Elenco
      • Sasha Luss
      • Alexis Ren
      • Robert Coleby
    • 20Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 24Opiniones de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:31
    Official Trailer

    Fotos41

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    + 37
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal16

    Editar
    Sasha Luss
    Sasha Luss
    • Hana
    Alexis Ren
    Alexis Ren
    • Jen
    Robert Coleby
    Robert Coleby
    • Landlord
    Ava Caryofyllis
    Ava Caryofyllis
    • Young Girl
    • (voz)
    Kelly B. Jones
    Kelly B. Jones
    • Officer #1
    Willy Zogo
    Willy Zogo
    • Officer #2
    Edward Frame
    Edward Frame
    • Alexey
    Sergei Voitov
    • Hana's Father
    Chloe Schwank
    Chloe Schwank
    • Omnia
    Harlee Timms
    • Courier
    Margarita Bakhtina
    • Young Girl
    Daria Skrygina
    • The Presence
    Jereme Levi Etherton
    • Officer #3
    Ozkan Curaoglu
    • Past Police #1
    Ilia Korablev
    • Past Police #3
    Lomasko Artem
    • Past Police #2
    • Dirección
      • James Croke
    • Guionista
      • James Croke
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios20

    4.23K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    5aronharde

    Fun premise but below average result

    "Latency" has a pretty interesting premise, and the viewer is immediately thrown into some virtual action with the main character, Hana. She is a professional gamer who suffers from acute agoraphobia. Shortly after receiving some highly advanced new gaming equipment, strange things start happening, and it seems like the new equipment is trying to control her. As I mentioned, the premise sounded really interesting, and the effects in the opening scene looked pretty decent. Sasha Luss does a good job as Hana, though her accent slipped a few times.

    Another thing that felt unrealistic was the portrayal of this absolutely beautiful and flawless woman, who also has an equally attractive girlfriend, played by Alexis Ren, as a professional gamer who spends most of her time playing online games. While it makes sense in terms of her agoraphobia, it was hard to buy into this setup in the movie. I'm not saying that beautiful women can't be gamers, but in this context, it felt unconvincing.

    Another issue is that the movie ultimately leads nowhere, with a narrative that is fairly mainstream and predictable. The ending was unsatisfying, with many questions left unanswered and multiple plot points leading into a void. Overall, the result was pretty unspectacular and below average. [4.7/10]
    1valic-09354

    A sloppy psychopath who didn't pay her electric bill.

    Before watching a movie, turn on your TV to maximum brightness - then you may be able to see something. But if you watch a dark screen 50% of the time, it's not a problem, you won't lose anything. A boring movie about a dirty (literally) girl who lives in a pigsty and saves energy. The entire movie is shot in a dark room with the windows draped and no lights on in the room. Almost all the light comes from the monitor, you can hardly see anything, not even the faces of the actors. The idea of the movie, the script, dialogues - as it seemed to me written by a junior high school student or a neural network (although, in my opinion, a neural network can write a better script). I did not empathize with the protagonist of the movie, and during the viewing (I watched this "masterpiece" to the end - and it was not easy) I would like that someone would kill her as soon as possible and turn on the light in the room.... My doctor friend said that Covid had a strong influence on some people - and their intelligence decreased (to put it simply, people became dumber), I think this movie is made by such people for "self-similar". I don't recommend watching it.
    6niunoniotro

    Underrated

    After the bad reviews I had read on several websites, I didn't have any faith in this movie.... but until you see it you can't say anything. It's a good drama with touches of sci-fi and horror. The fact that the whole movie takes place in an apartment may put off a type of viewer looking for more action, but in my point of view this fact plays totally in its favor.

    The film shows us a very tough mental illness. The fear of the outside world is creepy on its own and as someone who knows what the subject is about, for X circumstances, I can only thank the director and screenwriter James Croke for the respect they show for this disorder.

    Two separate mentions deserve the two leads - Alexis Ren as Jen, Hana's (Sasha Luss) only friend and her contact with the outside world is very tender, almost romantic and inevitably tragic. Alexis embroiders it. And what about Sasha Luss in her role as Hana, the woman whose world is based on video games, with a tragic past and a no less sad present. Both of them shine with their own light.

    Special mention to the special effects, which fortunately are more effective than gimmicky.

    A film full of details that does not deserve such a bad review.
    5marselleandres

    5/10

    "Latency" is a film that offers a mixed bag of impressive visuals and technical prowess but falters significantly in its narrative and character execution. With a rating of 5 out of 10, it's clear that while the film isn't a total failure, it does not quite reach the threshold of a good movie. Let me delve deeper into the various aspects of this film to provide a comprehensive understanding of why it falls into this middling category.

    Firstly, the production quality of "Latency" is commendable. The filmmakers have evidently invested a significant amount of time and resources into ensuring that the film looks polished and visually appealing. The graphics are particularly noteworthy, showcasing a level of detail and sophistication that is on par with some of the best in the industry. Whether it's the intricate design of the futuristic cityscape or the seamless integration of CGI elements, the visual experience is one of the high points of this film. This technical excellence in production is a substantial reason why I rated the film a 5, as it demonstrates a clear effort to create an engaging visual spectacle.

    However, a film's strength cannot rely solely on its visual appeal. The crux of any good movie lies in its storytelling and character development, areas where "Latency" unfortunately falls short. The story, which starts with an intriguing premise, quickly loses its momentum. The initial setup promises a captivating journey, but as the plot progresses, it becomes apparent that the narrative lacks depth and coherence. The middle part of the film, which should ideally build on the initial intrigue and develop the plot further, feels rushed and underdeveloped. Key plot points are glossed over, leaving the audience with a sense of confusion and dissatisfaction.

    The acting, too, leaves much to be desired. While the cast comprises some talented individuals, their performances are hampered by poorly written dialogue and lackluster character arcs. The protagonists fail to evoke empathy or connect with the audience on an emotional level, making it challenging to invest in their journey. This disconnect is further exacerbated by the film's pacing issues. The rapid progression of events, particularly towards the latter half of the film, gives the impression that the filmmakers were more concerned with wrapping up the story rather than allowing it to unfold naturally.

    One of the most glaring issues with "Latency" is the ending. The climax, which should serve as the culmination of the film's narrative and thematic elements, feels rushed and unsatisfying. Important plot threads are left unresolved, and the resolution lacks the emotional impact that is crucial for a fulfilling cinematic experience. This hurried conclusion undermines the initial promise of the film, leaving the audience with a sense of incompletion.

    Despite these shortcomings, there are a few redeeming aspects of "Latency" that warrant recognition. The soundtrack, for instance, complements the visual elements effectively, enhancing the overall atmosphere of the film. The cinematography, too, deserves a mention for its innovative use of camera angles and lighting to create mood and tension. These elements, though not enough to elevate the film to greatness, contribute to its overall aesthetic appeal.

    In conclusion, "Latency" is a film that had the potential to be much more than it ultimately is. Its impressive production quality and graphics are overshadowed by a weak narrative, underdeveloped characters, and a rushed conclusion. While it may offer a visually pleasing experience, it fails to deliver on the essential elements of storytelling and emotional engagement that define a truly good film. Thus, with a rating of 5 out of 10, "Latency" stands as a reminder that great visuals alone do not make a great movie; a compelling story and strong performances are equally, if not more, important.
    7candm-1

    How many films have the reviwers actually watched?

    4.2 out of 10 when this review was created.

    OK so how many films have the reviewers watched? The low score doesn't equate to the film I have just watched on Amazon. Like a stage play in the one room, most storytelling has been done before but you need to tell it in a new and unique way. The story went along at a good pace and had a start, middle and ending. Plenty of decent action and the headset gimmick was pretty good. I would say the budget was low on this one so kudos for making something unique.

    Plenty of movies miss the mark on the entertainment scale and if you are at a loose end looking for something a bit different then just give this some of your time.

    Más como esto

    Joe Crist
    4.0
    Joe Crist
    From Embers
    5.2
    From Embers
    Asombrosa Elisa
    4.0
    Asombrosa Elisa
    The Death of Snow White
    4.3
    The Death of Snow White
    Project MKHEXE
    5.0
    Project MKHEXE
    Mother's Child
    8.2
    Mother's Child
    Hollyoaks: Let Loose
    7.3
    Hollyoaks: Let Loose
    The Last Front
    5.5
    The Last Front
    Canary Currency
    7.4
    Canary Currency
    Ogiva: O Mundo Não é Mais Nosso
    6.5
    Ogiva: O Mundo Não é Mais Nosso
    Patsers
    6.3
    Patsers
    Gelin Takimi
    4.1
    Gelin Takimi

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      Originally rated R by the MPA "for language and some violent content" before it was edited to PG-13.
    • Errores
      In the childhood memory at the end of the film, the switch on the top of the Game Boy being played upon is switched off.

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 14 de junio de 2024 (Estados Unidos)
    • Países de origen
      • Estados Unidos
      • Tailandia
    • Sitios oficiales
      • Official Amazon Link
      • Official Site [Director's link]
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • También se conoce como
      • Latency: Kết Nối Tử Thần
    • Locaciones de filmación
      • Bangkok, Tailandia(on location)
    • Productoras
      • Grindstone Entertainment Group
      • Kaos Entertainment
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Taquilla

    Editar
    • Total a nivel mundial
      • USD 106,096
    Ver la información detallada de la taquilla en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      1 hora 34 minutos
    • Color
      • Color
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 2.39:1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.