Dominatrix Rates 9 Dominatrix Scenes in Movies & TV

Name: Dominatrix Rates 9 Dominatrix Scenes in Movies & TV
Genre: Documental, Corto
Released: 2022-10-25
Duration: 15 min
Cast: Damiana Chi

Video
2022
15min

TU CALIFICACIÓN

Corto Documental

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaProfessional dominatrix and certified sexologist Damiana Chi rates nine dominatrix scenes in movies and TV, such as "Euphoria," for realism. Chi breaks down the accuracy of ethics and safety... Leer todoProfessional dominatrix and certified sexologist Damiana Chi rates nine dominatrix scenes in movies and TV, such as "Euphoria," for realism. Chi breaks down the accuracy of ethics and safety procedures of BDSM scenes in "Euphoria" (2019), "Transparent" (2016), and "The Wolf of Wa... Leer todoProfessional dominatrix and certified sexologist Damiana Chi rates nine dominatrix scenes in movies and TV, such as "Euphoria," for realism. Chi breaks down the accuracy of ethics and safety procedures of BDSM scenes in "Euphoria" (2019), "Transparent" (2016), and "The Wolf of Wall Street" (2013). She looks at the plausibility of BDSM sessions in "Bonding" (2019), "Po... Leer todo

Elenco
- Damiana Chi

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

TU CALIFICACIÓN

Elenco
- Damiana Chi

1Opinión de los usuarios

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

Fotos

Elenco principal1

Editar

Damiana Chi

Self - Professional Dominatrix
(as Mistress Damiana Chi)

Opiniones de usuarios1

Opiniones destacadas

2Musicianmagic

Useless YouTube video

This is a YouTube video (be warned there are almost as many commercial breaks as video) where Damiana Chi a professional Dominatrix gives her perspective on the accuracy in several TV show episodes and movies of Domination/Submission or Dominatrix/slave.

The first problem with this video is she hasn't watched the complete movies or TV episodes. Evidently, someone else gave her only partial scenes to critique. So much is taken out of context. She's not actually giving her opinion on complete TV shows or movies.

The second problem is what she is judging. Like giving high marks to one (I won't disclose here) because the whips on a wall look genuine including one similar to one of hers. While another she gives very low points for one instance of a whip landing in the wrong spot.

It was slightly interesting, so I will give 2 out of 10 for that. But otherwise credit little in value.