"La verdad puede hacerte libre""La verdad puede hacerte libre""La verdad puede hacerte libre"
Ronald Reagan
- Self - U.S. President
- (material de archivo)
Michio Kaku
- Self - Professor of Theoretical Physics
- (material de archivo)
Carol Rosin
- Self - speaker, author, educator
- (material de archivo)
Ellison Onizuka
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (material de archivo)
Joseph Spencer
- Self - CIA Whistleblower, Man in black - [1989 archive]
- (material de archivo)
Judith A. Resnik
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (material de archivo)
Cady Coleman
- Self - American NASA astronaut
- (material de archivo)
- (as Catherine Grace Coleman)
Michael J. Smith
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (material de archivo)
Opiniones destacadas
The fantasy that is FE is dying. And with good reason. All these fools can do is spout nonsensical fantasies that have ZERO basis in fact.
This third film is as far from a "ducumentary" as the other two. It's unwatchable nonsense for anyone with half a brain.
Not much more to add to this excellent review by vaulthunter-11946:
"A bunch of conspiracy crackpots showing off their incompetence and ignorance. The first couple of times were pretty laughable.
The joke stops being funny the third time.
Because their fantasy is instantly debunked with a single photograph from space (see Blue Marble, 1972, for the classic example), flerfs are compelled to deny everything space related. To them, there's no such thing as space. The stars are just spots on the "firmament", the sun and moon are so close that planes are in danger of crashing in to them (or they're illusions, or they're also just lights on the firmament, or anything else but the truth). Every video, every photo, is a CGI fake (even the ones so old that they predate CGI). Satellites obviously don't exist, they're either held up with weather balloons or they're faked with ground-based systems, including a network of oceanic buoys to explain how ships can use GPS when far from land. The ad hoc nonsense, often contradicting itself piles higher and deeper.
Moon landing deniers, BTW, hate them for stealing their work and tying it to even stupider nonsense.
And then there's Challenger. For those out of the loop, that's the space shuttle that exploded in 1986, killing seven astronauts.
But since "space is fake", the flerfs have to convince themselves that the disaster was fake. And so they've decided that those astronauts were never in the shuttle, and are still alive under fake identities. And they've picked out a few people who they've decided are those fake identities.
Some of them are completely unrelated people who look kind of similar, if your glasses are smudged, and have similar names. A couple are siblings of the departed.
The "identification" requires the idiotic assumption that the mysterious "They" who orchestrate these conspiracies were dumb enough to create entire new identities for the dead astronauts, but for some reason gave them the same names, or change only their first name and pose as their own fictional brother.
And they proceed to harass these people, trying to get them to "admit" to their part in the idiotic "conspiracy". And that's a substantial part of this video. Footage of them harassing people who have no connection to anything and just want to live their lives, or worse, people who lost a close relative and are now being accused of faking the whole thing.
A despicable thing to do at all. But worse to film it and publicise it, and implicitly encourage others to likewise harass the unfortunate targets.
These vermin are proud of their harassment. They shouldn't be. This is beyond any standard of decency"
This third film is as far from a "ducumentary" as the other two. It's unwatchable nonsense for anyone with half a brain.
Not much more to add to this excellent review by vaulthunter-11946:
"A bunch of conspiracy crackpots showing off their incompetence and ignorance. The first couple of times were pretty laughable.
The joke stops being funny the third time.
Because their fantasy is instantly debunked with a single photograph from space (see Blue Marble, 1972, for the classic example), flerfs are compelled to deny everything space related. To them, there's no such thing as space. The stars are just spots on the "firmament", the sun and moon are so close that planes are in danger of crashing in to them (or they're illusions, or they're also just lights on the firmament, or anything else but the truth). Every video, every photo, is a CGI fake (even the ones so old that they predate CGI). Satellites obviously don't exist, they're either held up with weather balloons or they're faked with ground-based systems, including a network of oceanic buoys to explain how ships can use GPS when far from land. The ad hoc nonsense, often contradicting itself piles higher and deeper.
Moon landing deniers, BTW, hate them for stealing their work and tying it to even stupider nonsense.
And then there's Challenger. For those out of the loop, that's the space shuttle that exploded in 1986, killing seven astronauts.
But since "space is fake", the flerfs have to convince themselves that the disaster was fake. And so they've decided that those astronauts were never in the shuttle, and are still alive under fake identities. And they've picked out a few people who they've decided are those fake identities.
Some of them are completely unrelated people who look kind of similar, if your glasses are smudged, and have similar names. A couple are siblings of the departed.
The "identification" requires the idiotic assumption that the mysterious "They" who orchestrate these conspiracies were dumb enough to create entire new identities for the dead astronauts, but for some reason gave them the same names, or change only their first name and pose as their own fictional brother.
And they proceed to harass these people, trying to get them to "admit" to their part in the idiotic "conspiracy". And that's a substantial part of this video. Footage of them harassing people who have no connection to anything and just want to live their lives, or worse, people who lost a close relative and are now being accused of faking the whole thing.
A despicable thing to do at all. But worse to film it and publicise it, and implicitly encourage others to likewise harass the unfortunate targets.
These vermin are proud of their harassment. They shouldn't be. This is beyond any standard of decency"
While I'm not sure about the conclusion, this movie is really well done, for such a low budget film. I think anyone who honestly, approaches the work, with an open mind, will at least be intrigued, and come away questioning everything they thought they new.
The lighting is not perfect in some scenes, the audio can be a little uneven, but there is a lot of outdoor, real locations, pretty brave move by the director.
The participants are the real hidden gems in my opinion, they each add their own flavor, to what I found really entertaining, and that's what it's about.
I was actually surprised how the story came together, and must admit, I have a lot of questions.
Great job!
The lighting is not perfect in some scenes, the audio can be a little uneven, but there is a lot of outdoor, real locations, pretty brave move by the director.
The participants are the real hidden gems in my opinion, they each add their own flavor, to what I found really entertaining, and that's what it's about.
I was actually surprised how the story came together, and must admit, I have a lot of questions.
Great job!
If this had been presented as a satire, it would work. Sadly, they think this rubbish is true. I've never seen such a twisted, border-line insane take on science.
How this currently as a four star rating is a mind-numbing mystery. It's proof of how many uneducated, naive and gullible people there are who will believe patently false nonsense.
Every true scientist should be posting reviews, although this is so ridiculous as to not even require debunking. Why someone would chose to believe something that can be proved incorrect through a variety of real-world observations without scientific instruments is shocking.
How this currently as a four star rating is a mind-numbing mystery. It's proof of how many uneducated, naive and gullible people there are who will believe patently false nonsense.
Every true scientist should be posting reviews, although this is so ridiculous as to not even require debunking. Why someone would chose to believe something that can be proved incorrect through a variety of real-world observations without scientific instruments is shocking.
Thanks to all involved for continuing the fight against the 500 years of brainwashing and nonsense that is the utterly wrong heliocentric and spinning globe-Earth cosmology theory. Movies and media like this will become more common and prominent as the blunders and deceit filters into the wider consciousness. Having said that, this documentary has some dubious material that could have been discarded. The last two entries in the series probably paint a fairer picture of the situation Not sure all of the topics here needed to be included. Still, overall fine effort, let's keep going til eveeryone figures out the earth isn't a spinning ball shooting through a vacuum-space millions of miles a day with half of us upside down on the opposite side of a ball to the other half!
"Because their fantasy is instantly debunked with a single photograph from space (see Blue Marble, 1972, for the classic example), flerfs are compelled to deny everything space related."
2 @vaulthunter-11946 You do actually know that The Blue Marble is not a photo from space, don't you? There has never been a photo of the whole of earth taken from outer space. The original image taken by Apollo 17 was the most accurate, hi-resolution photo of the Earth ever, but the NASA Blue Marble pic isn't a real photograph. It's a composite of numerous images layered on top of each other.
Created by Robert Simmon, the Photoshop whiz used a 43,200-pixel by 21,600-pixel map of the Earth stitched together by Reto Stöckli. Stöckli used about ten thousand 300-megabyte satellite scenes captured by the Terra satellite over a period of 100 days. But his image was just clean land and sea, having removed all the clouds.
And why are you so rude and angry at people who just want answers to questions about a spherical earth?
2 @vaulthunter-11946 You do actually know that The Blue Marble is not a photo from space, don't you? There has never been a photo of the whole of earth taken from outer space. The original image taken by Apollo 17 was the most accurate, hi-resolution photo of the Earth ever, but the NASA Blue Marble pic isn't a real photograph. It's a composite of numerous images layered on top of each other.
Created by Robert Simmon, the Photoshop whiz used a 43,200-pixel by 21,600-pixel map of the Earth stitched together by Reto Stöckli. Stöckli used about ten thousand 300-megabyte satellite scenes captured by the Terra satellite over a period of 100 days. But his image was just clean land and sea, having removed all the clouds.
And why are you so rude and angry at people who just want answers to questions about a spherical earth?
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Level with Me?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 45,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 7 minutos
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the French language plot outline for Level with Me (2023)?
Responda