"La verdad puede hacerte libre""La verdad puede hacerte libre""La verdad puede hacerte libre"
Ronald Reagan
- Self - U.S. President
- (material de archivo)
Michio Kaku
- Self - Professor of Theoretical Physics
- (material de archivo)
Carol Rosin
- Self - speaker, author, educator
- (material de archivo)
Ellison Onizuka
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (material de archivo)
Joseph Spencer
- Self - CIA Whistleblower, Man in black - [1989 archive]
- (material de archivo)
Judith A. Resnik
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (material de archivo)
Cady Coleman
- Self - American NASA astronaut
- (material de archivo)
- (as Catherine Grace Coleman)
Michael J. Smith
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (material de archivo)
Opiniones destacadas
The fantasy that is FE is dying. And with good reason. All these fools can do is spout nonsensical fantasies that have ZERO basis in fact.
This third film is as far from a "ducumentary" as the other two. It's unwatchable nonsense for anyone with half a brain.
Not much more to add to this excellent review by vaulthunter-11946:
"A bunch of conspiracy crackpots showing off their incompetence and ignorance. The first couple of times were pretty laughable.
The joke stops being funny the third time.
Because their fantasy is instantly debunked with a single photograph from space (see Blue Marble, 1972, for the classic example), flerfs are compelled to deny everything space related. To them, there's no such thing as space. The stars are just spots on the "firmament", the sun and moon are so close that planes are in danger of crashing in to them (or they're illusions, or they're also just lights on the firmament, or anything else but the truth). Every video, every photo, is a CGI fake (even the ones so old that they predate CGI). Satellites obviously don't exist, they're either held up with weather balloons or they're faked with ground-based systems, including a network of oceanic buoys to explain how ships can use GPS when far from land. The ad hoc nonsense, often contradicting itself piles higher and deeper.
Moon landing deniers, BTW, hate them for stealing their work and tying it to even stupider nonsense.
And then there's Challenger. For those out of the loop, that's the space shuttle that exploded in 1986, killing seven astronauts.
But since "space is fake", the flerfs have to convince themselves that the disaster was fake. And so they've decided that those astronauts were never in the shuttle, and are still alive under fake identities. And they've picked out a few people who they've decided are those fake identities.
Some of them are completely unrelated people who look kind of similar, if your glasses are smudged, and have similar names. A couple are siblings of the departed.
The "identification" requires the idiotic assumption that the mysterious "They" who orchestrate these conspiracies were dumb enough to create entire new identities for the dead astronauts, but for some reason gave them the same names, or change only their first name and pose as their own fictional brother.
And they proceed to harass these people, trying to get them to "admit" to their part in the idiotic "conspiracy". And that's a substantial part of this video. Footage of them harassing people who have no connection to anything and just want to live their lives, or worse, people who lost a close relative and are now being accused of faking the whole thing.
A despicable thing to do at all. But worse to film it and publicise it, and implicitly encourage others to likewise harass the unfortunate targets.
These vermin are proud of their harassment. They shouldn't be. This is beyond any standard of decency"
This third film is as far from a "ducumentary" as the other two. It's unwatchable nonsense for anyone with half a brain.
Not much more to add to this excellent review by vaulthunter-11946:
"A bunch of conspiracy crackpots showing off their incompetence and ignorance. The first couple of times were pretty laughable.
The joke stops being funny the third time.
Because their fantasy is instantly debunked with a single photograph from space (see Blue Marble, 1972, for the classic example), flerfs are compelled to deny everything space related. To them, there's no such thing as space. The stars are just spots on the "firmament", the sun and moon are so close that planes are in danger of crashing in to them (or they're illusions, or they're also just lights on the firmament, or anything else but the truth). Every video, every photo, is a CGI fake (even the ones so old that they predate CGI). Satellites obviously don't exist, they're either held up with weather balloons or they're faked with ground-based systems, including a network of oceanic buoys to explain how ships can use GPS when far from land. The ad hoc nonsense, often contradicting itself piles higher and deeper.
Moon landing deniers, BTW, hate them for stealing their work and tying it to even stupider nonsense.
And then there's Challenger. For those out of the loop, that's the space shuttle that exploded in 1986, killing seven astronauts.
But since "space is fake", the flerfs have to convince themselves that the disaster was fake. And so they've decided that those astronauts were never in the shuttle, and are still alive under fake identities. And they've picked out a few people who they've decided are those fake identities.
Some of them are completely unrelated people who look kind of similar, if your glasses are smudged, and have similar names. A couple are siblings of the departed.
The "identification" requires the idiotic assumption that the mysterious "They" who orchestrate these conspiracies were dumb enough to create entire new identities for the dead astronauts, but for some reason gave them the same names, or change only their first name and pose as their own fictional brother.
And they proceed to harass these people, trying to get them to "admit" to their part in the idiotic "conspiracy". And that's a substantial part of this video. Footage of them harassing people who have no connection to anything and just want to live their lives, or worse, people who lost a close relative and are now being accused of faking the whole thing.
A despicable thing to do at all. But worse to film it and publicise it, and implicitly encourage others to likewise harass the unfortunate targets.
These vermin are proud of their harassment. They shouldn't be. This is beyond any standard of decency"
"Because their fantasy is instantly debunked with a single photograph from space (see Blue Marble, 1972, for the classic example), flerfs are compelled to deny everything space related."
2 @vaulthunter-11946 You do actually know that The Blue Marble is not a photo from space, don't you? There has never been a photo of the whole of earth taken from outer space. The original image taken by Apollo 17 was the most accurate, hi-resolution photo of the Earth ever, but the NASA Blue Marble pic isn't a real photograph. It's a composite of numerous images layered on top of each other.
Created by Robert Simmon, the Photoshop whiz used a 43,200-pixel by 21,600-pixel map of the Earth stitched together by Reto Stöckli. Stöckli used about ten thousand 300-megabyte satellite scenes captured by the Terra satellite over a period of 100 days. But his image was just clean land and sea, having removed all the clouds.
And why are you so rude and angry at people who just want answers to questions about a spherical earth?
2 @vaulthunter-11946 You do actually know that The Blue Marble is not a photo from space, don't you? There has never been a photo of the whole of earth taken from outer space. The original image taken by Apollo 17 was the most accurate, hi-resolution photo of the Earth ever, but the NASA Blue Marble pic isn't a real photograph. It's a composite of numerous images layered on top of each other.
Created by Robert Simmon, the Photoshop whiz used a 43,200-pixel by 21,600-pixel map of the Earth stitched together by Reto Stöckli. Stöckli used about ten thousand 300-megabyte satellite scenes captured by the Terra satellite over a period of 100 days. But his image was just clean land and sea, having removed all the clouds.
And why are you so rude and angry at people who just want answers to questions about a spherical earth?
Whether you believe in flat earth or not shouldn't be a reason to be "cancelled". The truth does not fear questioning, the truth is truth whether you believe it or not, truth needs no defense, truth doesn't feel threatened. Only lies fear being questioned. We all know in real life interpersonal interactions that when in a conversation if anyone personally attacks someone or makes fun of them or scoffs in any amount that is a giveaway that something is not kosher, and someone is afraid of something. Confident or truthful people don't stoop to such low heights. Any great scientist, philosopher, great thinker, or wise person knows that listening is better than talking and an open mind is smarter than a closed mind.
Thanks to all involved for continuing the fight against the 500 years of brainwashing and nonsense that is the utterly wrong heliocentric and spinning globe-Earth cosmology theory. Movies and media like this will become more common and prominent as the blunders and deceit filters into the wider consciousness. Having said that, this documentary has some dubious material that could have been discarded. The last two entries in the series probably paint a fairer picture of the situation Not sure all of the topics here needed to be included. Still, overall fine effort, let's keep going til eveeryone figures out the earth isn't a spinning ball shooting through a vacuum-space millions of miles a day with half of us upside down on the opposite side of a ball to the other half!
Anyone willing to think outside of the box, can put the pieces together that the moon landing was fake. What society calls 'Flat Earthers' are really just heliocentric deniers, and don't necessarily believe the earth is completely flat.
As for the third installment of Hibbler's Level trilogy it focus's more on the second attempt to space where a handful of people supposedly died in the exploding rocket.
The documentary is charged with the plausible theory that no one actually died in the explosion, and most are still living out normal lives. Although it can't really be considered concrete evidence, there is enough to form your own personal opinion.
It also touches a bit on satellites being within our atmosphere, held up by massive helium balloons.
Which is also very true just not widely known! Although the governments tried to keep this under wraps, it has been exposed by too many insiders.
Level With Me is a solid documentary that can stand on its own two feet, but I highly recommend watching the first two to grasp the whole picture. 8/10.
As for the third installment of Hibbler's Level trilogy it focus's more on the second attempt to space where a handful of people supposedly died in the exploding rocket.
The documentary is charged with the plausible theory that no one actually died in the explosion, and most are still living out normal lives. Although it can't really be considered concrete evidence, there is enough to form your own personal opinion.
It also touches a bit on satellites being within our atmosphere, held up by massive helium balloons.
Which is also very true just not widely known! Although the governments tried to keep this under wraps, it has been exposed by too many insiders.
Level With Me is a solid documentary that can stand on its own two feet, but I highly recommend watching the first two to grasp the whole picture. 8/10.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Level with Me?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 45,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 7 minutos
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the French language plot outline for Level with Me (2023)?
Responda