CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.1/10
11 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Una amable enfermera intenta desvelar los secretos de las lesiones de un paciente en coma, y descubre la amarga rivalidad, la infidelidad, la traición y el asesinato que se esconden tras ell... Leer todoUna amable enfermera intenta desvelar los secretos de las lesiones de un paciente en coma, y descubre la amarga rivalidad, la infidelidad, la traición y el asesinato que se esconden tras ellas.Una amable enfermera intenta desvelar los secretos de las lesiones de un paciente en coma, y descubre la amarga rivalidad, la infidelidad, la traición y el asesinato que se esconden tras ellas.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
Cain Aiden
- Student
- (sin créditos)
Zak Holland
- Music School Student
- (sin créditos)
Sam Lockwood
- Massage Therapist
- (sin créditos)
Robbie Main
- Congregation
- (sin créditos)
- …
Guy Robbins
- Paramedic
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
To start with IMDB need to adjust their synopsis of this movie, no way is it an horror movie, this was the only reason I watched it.
It's a mystery and thriller and that's about it.
I am going to give this Netflix movie a five star rating, while I did enjoy it, this movie had some real plot holes and some slap in the face scenes which could have been filmed better and tighter to make to movie more nerve racking.
The twists and turns more or less were done properly and left you guessing most of the way through, I also liked the way the film went back and forth from now and the past.
What I thought was a bit silly and could have been done better were scenes like the horse chase scene, some of the back and forth scenes near the end went on for to long.
I also have seen reviews in which some people wanted a better finish to the film, which I get.
This film also went from the doctor is the bad guy, no he's not, the young girl is. Sometimes this was done well, then sometimes you thought get on with it.
A mixed bag but I did enjoy it, would I watch it again, no I wouldn't, would I recommend it, no I don't think so.
Worth a watch.
It's a mystery and thriller and that's about it.
I am going to give this Netflix movie a five star rating, while I did enjoy it, this movie had some real plot holes and some slap in the face scenes which could have been filmed better and tighter to make to movie more nerve racking.
The twists and turns more or less were done properly and left you guessing most of the way through, I also liked the way the film went back and forth from now and the past.
What I thought was a bit silly and could have been done better were scenes like the horse chase scene, some of the back and forth scenes near the end went on for to long.
I also have seen reviews in which some people wanted a better finish to the film, which I get.
This film also went from the doctor is the bad guy, no he's not, the young girl is. Sometimes this was done well, then sometimes you thought get on with it.
A mixed bag but I did enjoy it, would I watch it again, no I wouldn't, would I recommend it, no I don't think so.
Worth a watch.
Locked In is generically a modern Gothic story. British, manor, orphans, illness, love affairs, duplicitous characters, plots within plots, etc. All of that, the movie does well.
Do we need another Gothic mystery of orphaned child becoming entwined with a decaying family and its manor? Probably not. Do the actors move past the 2 dimensional nature of their characters? Decidedly no. Does the story line bring anything new or ingenious to the story? A resounding no.
Part of the issue I see is that the main character is the young orphaned girl and her movement into this family and the machinations of the plot. She's not that interesting of a character. And the narrow focus that the film takes toward her shuts out the other characters from being able to provide much richness to the story.
This harkens to the great movie and story of Rebbeca in many ways. But that film allowed other characters room to play, and the uncertainty of motivations and conniving increased the sense of tension and dread. As a copy or comparison of that, this films decidedly missed the mark. As a display of a Gothic story, it does all right.
Do we need another Gothic mystery of orphaned child becoming entwined with a decaying family and its manor? Probably not. Do the actors move past the 2 dimensional nature of their characters? Decidedly no. Does the story line bring anything new or ingenious to the story? A resounding no.
Part of the issue I see is that the main character is the young orphaned girl and her movement into this family and the machinations of the plot. She's not that interesting of a character. And the narrow focus that the film takes toward her shuts out the other characters from being able to provide much richness to the story.
This harkens to the great movie and story of Rebbeca in many ways. But that film allowed other characters room to play, and the uncertainty of motivations and conniving increased the sense of tension and dread. As a copy or comparison of that, this films decidedly missed the mark. As a display of a Gothic story, it does all right.
Movie starts slow and takes its time to set out background and character relationships. Expect to be less engaged until the midway point. From there, the movie picks up its pace and the viewer can expect to question what's going on until the end of the film. Who is the victim? Who put this woman in the hospital? Is the woman in the hospital not as helpless as she seems? What is up with Lina? Well this nurse is about to find it all out, so pay attention.
I'm landing on a 6 for this one because it's good and keeps you guessing. A 7 and above needs to be excellent++ and this one falls short just slightly but still worth the watch.
I'm landing on a 6 for this one because it's good and keeps you guessing. A 7 and above needs to be excellent++ and this one falls short just slightly but still worth the watch.
Nurse Nicky Mackenzie (Anna Friel) gets a new patient, Katherine (Famke Janssen) who is unable to communicate due to her injuries. She starts talking to Katherine's visitor Lina (Rose Williams). 13 years earlier after the death of Lina's mother, Katherine had become her guardian. At the time, Katherine was a rich and famous Hollywood actress. Her son Jamie suffers from periodic seizures. 3 years earlier, Lina is marrying Jamie (Finn Cole). Dr. Robert Lawrence (Alex Hassell) is treating Jamie.
This feels more like an old timey soapy romance melodrama mystery. I like all these actors. I am slightly intrigued with their characters. I would change one thing for sure. Nicky Mackenzie should be a cop investigating Katherine's incident. As a nurse, she adds no tension to the story. As a cop, she could uncover some sort of foul play and the audience would be more invested in the mystery.
This feels more like an old timey soapy romance melodrama mystery. I like all these actors. I am slightly intrigued with their characters. I would change one thing for sure. Nicky Mackenzie should be a cop investigating Katherine's incident. As a nurse, she adds no tension to the story. As a cop, she could uncover some sort of foul play and the audience would be more invested in the mystery.
This forgettable Netflix thriller is poorly directed, acted and written that I felt ' locked in' and couldn't do anything to turn it off.
Laura would have loved to have tortured me with this junk!
It's unthrilling in its storytelling- no tension, suspense or action so it doesn't grab the audience from the beginning.
It's look is purely TV , a unfocused ,dimly lit splurge- that midway through Laura thought she was watching a TV show by asking" how many episodes is this?" The only thing frightening and creepy is Famke Janssen's face job!
It's also hilarious to see a hospital utterly devoid of other people/patients: day or night- believe me there's always someone about.
When Netflix finance films for their network - Reptile being a prime example, they do it with style and finesse, here it's tedious, bottom of the barrel mid 90s direct to DVD schlock.
Laura would have loved to have tortured me with this junk!
It's unthrilling in its storytelling- no tension, suspense or action so it doesn't grab the audience from the beginning.
It's look is purely TV , a unfocused ,dimly lit splurge- that midway through Laura thought she was watching a TV show by asking" how many episodes is this?" The only thing frightening and creepy is Famke Janssen's face job!
It's also hilarious to see a hospital utterly devoid of other people/patients: day or night- believe me there's always someone about.
When Netflix finance films for their network - Reptile being a prime example, they do it with style and finesse, here it's tedious, bottom of the barrel mid 90s direct to DVD schlock.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe story line is a direct adaptation of Émile Zola's novel "Thérèse Raquin", published for the first time in Paris in 1867.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Locked In?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Locked In
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 36min(96 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta