Not sure if this is an agenda-setting story but there are many facts that one can not dismiss their significance in establishing a theory that could be half-true and half-false.
Gujarat Riots:
- if SIT finding did not implicate then CM Modi or his government then what fueled 3 days of carnage
- In what circumstances was Haren Pandya killed?
- A smart and brilliant IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt who took on Modi was put behind bars for life imprisonment!!!! As he was the sole surviving witness of the carnage
- Why SC upheld the finding of SIT? Why it did not investigate further into the witnesses' testimonies
-Why human rights activist who helped Jaafri's widow (Jaffri was the MP who asked for Modi's help as his home was attacked by a mob but Modi refused and later he was beheaded by the same mob)
The Pink Revolution:
2017 lynching and killing of 300 mostly Muslims subsequent to PM Modi's strong message about animals being slaughtered on the name of the Pink Revolution esp about export of beef Good intention but he failed to deliver the same as a leader. Why did he wait to condemn the violence and he broke his silence only when Alimuddin Mansoori was killed. BJP spokesman NityaAnand Mahto and few others were arrested in connection with Mansoori's killing but then all 8 convicts were bailed. This bail was given by BJP minister Jayant Sinha who welcomed the convicts with garlands upon their release. These men are still free!!!! Why?
NRC (CAA):
Targeted to track illegal immigrants and make a roll call system, a much needed for the country. But then what went wrong? PM Modi's statement "We passed the bill to help the persecuted." clearly states his intention to welcome oppressed Hindus. Nothing wrong to do so. But why were Muslims singled out? How can one justify the police brutality at Jamia Millia University. As a leader he should have open the doors for talks instead of using force and a divisive approach.
Nothing wrong if India becomes a Hindu nation when 80% of the population is Hindus. But what exactly is Hindu Rashtra? How do you define Hindu Rashtra?
Does it mean
Enforcing the Caste System?
Eradicating non-Hindus?
Becoming exclusionary for the key positions in the government?
Prohibiting inter-racial marriages?
Governing or restricting a religion specific practices, laws?
Restricting non-Hindu migration?
BJP's brand nationalism and the Hindutva ideology may have plagued the nation seemingly. But the fact remains that more than a billion people of different faiths and strong ideologies are still living in harmony. India lives in its diversity, its rich culture and its integrity.
Documentary does seem biased and lopsided. For example, no one from the Godhera incidence victims' families was interviewed during the documentary making. It deals with black and white scenarios. Extremism prevails on both the sides but only one side is shown. The goal of documentary is to prove that Muslims in india have a horrifying life and they all live in fear. It however does raise questions. Whether commander or the chain of Command was on the bandwagon, or however little their part was but as a leader he must own those mistakes or actions that were buggered up or targeted or conspired but all under his watch. Establishing a criminal conspiracy within a law is often difficult but the conduct could still be questionable.
