Beyond Skinwalker Ranch

The pseudoscience, the stilted expository conversations and performative amazement. It's as cringeworthy as you'd imagine. Particularly because it's not a parody. This show is delivered as though the work is sober and rigorous. Disco lasers "adding energy" to the environment... "This blob is an interference pattern"... These grown adults grasp each flicker from their instruments, turn it into a quirky hypothesis and then leap to scientific certainty, all while proclaiming to be skeptical and serious-minded.

Maybe it sells, to some audiences. But, to anyone with any exposure to physics, audio, science, data analysis, or just common sense, you're in for a rough time.

In a nutshell, adults behave like imaginative kids who just got new toys, except with no humour.

This show has a slightly different feel than 'The Secret...' but I love it just as much, particularly since it includes Eric and Travis for a brief time in the beginning and the end (I love those guys.)

I have loved Paul Beban and his mind since 'Paranormal Declassified,' a wonderful series of episodes of his brilliant investigative journalism dealing with a number of topics which interest me. This series also first introduced me to the wonderful Jonathan Dover, who has become an important part of the whole Skinwalker Ranch extended crew.

The pairing of Paul with Andy Bustamente works fine, and they take on a variety of places (and people) with great entusiasm and creative investigative vigor, using many of the main show's extended crew's technologists and experts. I think this show is an important part of the overarching investigation into the mysteries of our land. Love 'Beyond..' and want more, more, more!

This is a must see for everyone who is interested in paranormal, mystery and UFOs . A great addition to the Secret of the Skinwalker Ranch series as well.

Results of the scientific experiments conducted by the team are mind-blowing and mind-boggling. The series contributes to expanding our present understanding about certain paranormal phenomena that have been reported throughout the world for centuries.

The series does not get boring nor uninteresting for a second. Most of the sites chosen for the investigations are being investigated for the first time on TV. Truly exploring the unseen and the unknown for the first time.

The only negative point I see is that the research team should have spent more time on each location and created more episodes than one for each location. Need more episodes!

Paul Beban & Andy Bustamante is a perfect combination for the show!

First of all, Andy Bustamante is a hack. He was on the Shawn Ryan show and spent three hours talking about nothing. He was introduced as retired Air Force which he is Not retired! He got out without fulfilling qualifications for retirement. Retirement=pension, at least get that part right, Paul.

Paul Beban is frankly a terrible host, he really adds no value to the show what so ever. He's in the background like a mushroom, staring blankly at the camera.

Their equipment always seems to fail and the key moments and sorry, dude, you're in a fricken desert, there's a lot of heat! The use the gamma cam, and genius Paul says "where there's Radon, there's probably Uranium". Geez, Paul, you are officially an idiot. There is ZERO correlation between the presence of Radon and the presence of Uranium. Radon frequently travels through the ground water, so smoke doesn't necessarily mean fire.

The whole thing is so obviously staged, it's painful to watch and takes so much away from the original show.

Hard pass. It's another Oak Island, endless drama about nonsense.

I am a true believer in the paranormal. The reason for my leaving this review is that if you are trying to show if something does or doesn't conduct electricity you really should have used the same item ie., the blue opal or the quartz crystal, that were from different areas of the world. Seeing is believing and only a partial showing leaves doubts. By not proving beyond a reasonable doubt that these items would have reacted different even with them undergoing the same procedures leaves questions. Just because you say it does, doesn't prove it will. You need to have verifiable proof of the anomaly.