15 Cameras

This is a fun and very flawed movie. Cleverly constructed, with massive plot holes and annoying characters - yet somehow they are all endearing. I don't know why, but I really liked the characters, even the ultra annoying and stupid lead "Cam" ironically named.

This is the third in the camera series 13 and 14. I think this is the best one, using a meta plot around documentary that features the villain of the first two.

Overall, it's a popcorn flick. Don't take it serious, there are massive plot holes and a lot of the dialogue is pointless...but I still enjoyed those meandering scenes. If you want to zone out with a bottle of wine this could be a fun choice 6.2/10.

Aptly named 15 cameras as a third instalment to the previous two movies the first 13 cameras and the second 14 cameras. I find I'm at a loss for words as to why they gave him the name slumlord for this follow up movie instead of the name from the previous two movies. But anyways the plot was decent enough. But there's gaps in things like the hidden surveillance room he was in I could've sworn the first time he discovered it. It was on their side of the duplex and not the tenants side. I also don't get why they didn't cast the same guy that played the main character in 13 and 14 cameras either. But they did a decent job at casting a guy that looked similar enough that a lot of ppl might not question it. But I watch a lot of movies.

It's funny that this 'CAmeras' thing became a Franchise. 3rd in the CAMERAS TRILOGY (so far), made by Gravitas Ventures for the IFC Channel! I really enjoyed the first two and this 3rd one it starts out good! +1 Star for the opening!

Haha. The Slumlord Tapes? Now the guy is a slumlord eh? Funny.

Oh no! It gets a -1 Star for having a shower scene and showing no nudity! We have rules for our reviews!!!!

When his girlfriend calls him a DIRTY OLD MAN that was the one statement in the movie to which I could most relate!

Oh come on! The end sucks. Terrible Terrible thing they did. Shame on whoever made this. 4/10.

Many writing errors that I don't want to reveal so as not to spoilerThe character of the boy who looks at the cameras secretly and really useless cannot convey anything interesting they could find a better interpreter since he turns almost all around him who looks at the cameras clearly is also written this character because honestly to do what what He did it from the face it seemed that he had found Eldorado, however even the other character are sometimes too contradictory and this also does not help the vision of the film, then always talking about the boy's character and too exaggerated it is very bad, perhaps to make him unpleasant and annoying To the viewer he does some really stupid things that even a 5 -year -old boy would do and then everything is happy !!!! Honestly, it seems only stupid to me as it is written! You can watch but it is certainly not a revisable film.

I haven't seen the two movies before this one although I am aware of how they run.

This is a fairly solid piece of work. A house with history, a decent bad guy and a creepy premise. The direction is ok, the acting is good, the script is a little so so, there is plot plenty of tension and general creepiness.

Some of the plot points are a little weird. Such as the reaction when people are found in other people's houses, why does nobody call the police at any time? And the ending is a little strange.

Overall, I guess if you liked the previous two movies then this this will not disappoint at all.