Space Babies
- El episodio se transmitió el 10 may 2024
- 46min
Ruby descubre los increíbles secretos del Doctor cuando éste la lleva a un futuro lejano. Allí encuentran una granja de bebés dirigida por bebés. Pero, ¿podrán salvarse del terrorífico hombr... Leer todoRuby descubre los increíbles secretos del Doctor cuando éste la lleva a un futuro lejano. Allí encuentran una granja de bebés dirigida por bebés. Pero, ¿podrán salvarse del terrorífico hombre del saco?Ruby descubre los increíbles secretos del Doctor cuando éste la lleva a un futuro lejano. Allí encuentran una granja de bebés dirigida por bebés. Pero, ¿podrán salvarse del terrorífico hombre del saco?
- Eric
- (voz)
- Marcel
- (voz)
- Space Baby
- (sin créditos)
- Space Baby
- (sin créditos)
- Additional Voices
- (voz)
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Introducing Ruby Sunday (Millie Gibson) to how the Tardis works lands she, and the Doctor (Ncuti Gatwa) on a space station manned by a crew of babies, seemingly abandoned by their creators and looked after by an overseeing computer (Golda Rosheuvel). The abandonment isn't the crews only problem though as, in the lower decks, between them and the Tardis is a vicious looking creature nicknamed "The Bogeyman".
Mixed feelings about this episode. The good news is that I liked the elements that are going to stay, for this season at least. Gatwa and Gibson are both great and there's a nice dynamic between them. It's got some funny lines and it's continuing to do what Davies' previous run did and layering in the season story - which looks like it will be focused on Ruby's parentage, the mystery of which began in the last Christmas special.
The actual episode though was a bit confused and had some horrible CGI. The creature effect was fine, if perhaps a little generic. The CGI mouths of the talking babies though was both badly done and off putting, and I really didn't like seeing it. The show also felt confused as to whether they were actual babies though, I think the logic was that they were 6-year-olds that hadn't developed but they didn't act like that sometimes. (Also, that's not how an airlock would work). The Disney Dollars seemed to have been spent on a CGI dinosaur world that appeared earlier and shots of the Tardis.
Davies is perhaps a bolder writer now, from the shows he's written since his first run with The Doctor, and, whilst the show has always been socially conscious, there are explicit analogies made about both the abortion laws and refugee policy within this story.
Whilst this first episode is a bit underwhelming, particularly to proclaim the shows new start, I'm not overly concerned that the shows headed in the wrong direction or anything like that. Hopefully, without the need to do all the introductions stuff from now on, and with more time for the story, things will pick up.
BUT.....speaking "Space Babies"? This is a strong competition to some of the worst movies from the 90s and early 2000ths. You should never, ever let babies speak. Not mentioning the uncanny valley effect when looking at the voiceacted and animated babymouths.
It got better towards the end, even though its "We have to save everybody, no matter what" - message doesnt quite fit, but its understandable.
Really hope the next Episode will convince me more.
There was a time when Russell T Davies could write a good script and screenplay, I really don't know what happened here, but I'll take a guess that he literally pulled it out of his nose.
It's a day later and I'm still angry about how bad it was.
On to the story, Davies has always had political or social undertones. None of them detracts from the story even though they were clearly complaints/comments. The writing was clearly meant to be juvenile. 6 years olds in onsies. Overall, but the overall poop, smell, and dirty diaper jokes throughout the story is classical low hanging fruit that Davies gets fixated on sometimes. Tarnished a story with a lot of energy and chemistry along with some really funny buts and some scary moments.
I was a bit down on doctor who for the last seasons as i did not like the showrunner and the way they moved with the show but i stucked in.
I was kinda hyped for Russel T Davies to be back and even i am an Moffat Fanboy i kinda liked Davies stories.
I likes the Special Episodes and also the first episode i think was kinda fun.
This episode made me stop watching and i have not yet watched episode 3+ yet half a year in ... This episode is SO UNBELIEVABLE bad that i dont even know if its the worst doctor who episode, or the worst episode of any show in tv history.
I encourage everyone to skip this episode or you end like me and stop watching it all together.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaRuby's fear of stepping on a butterfly and the butterfly that the Doctor revives are a reference to Ray Bradbury's short story "A Sound of Thunder", in which a time traveler travels into the past and, by stepping on a butterfly, changes the future in terrifying ways. The story was published in 1953 in the book "The Golden Apples of the Sun".
- ErroresThe Doctor mentions that he was left alone in the middle of outer space and was taken in by the Time Lords. In the Timeless Child story arc, the Doctor is a foundling adopted by Tecteun, who was Shobogan, a species native to Gallifrey before the advent of time travel on the planet and before the rise of the Time Lords.
- Citas
Ruby Sunday: Is that a monster?
The Doctor: No. No, don't be silly, Ruby. There's no such thing as monsters - there's just... Just creatures you haven't met yet.
- ConexionesFeatured in Doctor Who: Unleashed: Space Babies (2024)
Selecciones populares
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 46min
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido