La apacible vida suburbana de un exasesino se desmorona tras un asalto en su hogar que desvela oscuros secretos del pasado de su esposa, obligándole a regresar a su violento pasado.La apacible vida suburbana de un exasesino se desmorona tras un asalto en su hogar que desvela oscuros secretos del pasado de su esposa, obligándole a regresar a su violento pasado.La apacible vida suburbana de un exasesino se desmorona tras un asalto en su hogar que desvela oscuros secretos del pasado de su esposa, obligándole a regresar a su violento pasado.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Opiniones destacadas
Loved the first movie; it was unexpectedly great. This one was just mediocre. The action and fight scenes were pretty good and fun to watch. The story line could have been better, but the absolutely terrible acting from Sharon Stone, in all honesty, completely ruined the entire movie for me. I'm not sure if they were looking for a surprise big name for this role, but they completely missed the mark on casting.
I just got back from seeing it at the theaters
The movie, overall, matches the original, which is a big accomplishment for a sequel: the original will always have the distinction of being the first, and with this particular premise, a huge hindrance is that he can't really be a Nobody twice. Part 1 could build up the moment where the audience and supporting characters find out who he is, but the franchise can't replicate that plot device in sequels. By Part 2, he's a Somebody.
Still, though, the movie surpasses the original in 2 areas. Firstly, I think that the comedy in Part 2 surpasses the comedy in Part 1. There were numerous instances in Part 2 that legitimately had me laughing, and I'm not easy to please on comedy (e.g. I found the 2025 Naked Gun movie to be unfunny). To say what parts had me laughing might ruin those parts, so I won't say. Secondly, I think that Sharon Stone makes a better, more memorable antagonist than the Russian guy in Part 1.
The movie's other positives are basically the same positives that apply to Part 1. Bob Odenkirk is a likable and charming protagonist. Though his role as Saul Goodman is iconic, you don't actually see Saul Goodman when you watch him in this movie; he occupies this role entirely. The movie blends the slick, intense action scenes with hilarious comedy in a way that neither clashes with the other or creates awkwardness. The compact 90-minute runtime is perfect. And I like Christopher Lloyd. We don't know how many more big-screen movies he'll appear in, so we should cherish them
In terms of flaws - the movie has a predictable plot; nothing here is really original or creative. And I don't imagine that many people, after watching, will remember this movie in the long-run. The movie builds up Sharon Stone's character, yet the protagonists take her out relatively easily. There are some cliches. There are some elements recycled from the first film
I gave the original a 6.5/10. I'll give this one the same score
6.5/10.
The movie, overall, matches the original, which is a big accomplishment for a sequel: the original will always have the distinction of being the first, and with this particular premise, a huge hindrance is that he can't really be a Nobody twice. Part 1 could build up the moment where the audience and supporting characters find out who he is, but the franchise can't replicate that plot device in sequels. By Part 2, he's a Somebody.
Still, though, the movie surpasses the original in 2 areas. Firstly, I think that the comedy in Part 2 surpasses the comedy in Part 1. There were numerous instances in Part 2 that legitimately had me laughing, and I'm not easy to please on comedy (e.g. I found the 2025 Naked Gun movie to be unfunny). To say what parts had me laughing might ruin those parts, so I won't say. Secondly, I think that Sharon Stone makes a better, more memorable antagonist than the Russian guy in Part 1.
The movie's other positives are basically the same positives that apply to Part 1. Bob Odenkirk is a likable and charming protagonist. Though his role as Saul Goodman is iconic, you don't actually see Saul Goodman when you watch him in this movie; he occupies this role entirely. The movie blends the slick, intense action scenes with hilarious comedy in a way that neither clashes with the other or creates awkwardness. The compact 90-minute runtime is perfect. And I like Christopher Lloyd. We don't know how many more big-screen movies he'll appear in, so we should cherish them
In terms of flaws - the movie has a predictable plot; nothing here is really original or creative. And I don't imagine that many people, after watching, will remember this movie in the long-run. The movie builds up Sharon Stone's character, yet the protagonists take her out relatively easily. There are some cliches. There are some elements recycled from the first film
I gave the original a 6.5/10. I'll give this one the same score
6.5/10.
Bob Odenkirk does not get enough love when it comes to roles outside of Saul Goodman. This man is the writer of the famous Matt Foley SNL sketch so of course he can do funny. I watched the first Nobody just for fun back when it came out, plus I wanted to go through Bob's filmography. My hubby and I enjoyed it. We like action and we don't take movies too seriously. We just like to be entertained. And Bob always does this.
We just went and saw the sequel and we were entertained again. I personally couldn't stand watching Sharon Stone as that bat-crazy idiot of a boss. Now, I loved her back in the day (I was a teen in the 90s) and I love seeing women in strong roles, but she was just annoying. Saying the F bomb every sentence didn't make her look tough. It made her look like she was TRYING to be tough and that's a big difference. She just couldn't act.
Colin Hanks was disappointing as well. I thought he was a better actor than that, too, but oh well.
I liked everything else and I'm ready for Becca's back story because she held it down, too.
Can't wait to see what Bob will do next!
We just went and saw the sequel and we were entertained again. I personally couldn't stand watching Sharon Stone as that bat-crazy idiot of a boss. Now, I loved her back in the day (I was a teen in the 90s) and I love seeing women in strong roles, but she was just annoying. Saying the F bomb every sentence didn't make her look tough. It made her look like she was TRYING to be tough and that's a big difference. She just couldn't act.
Colin Hanks was disappointing as well. I thought he was a better actor than that, too, but oh well.
I liked everything else and I'm ready for Becca's back story because she held it down, too.
Can't wait to see what Bob will do next!
I had a good time eventually, but there were things I did not like. The first movie treated Nobody seriously, here some modern writer decided to make a complete and utter joke out of him.
It's chock full of modern tropes that people are sick of, like the supremely badass female villain that's totally believable. Fire the writers.
It's chock full of modern tropes that people are sick of, like the supremely badass female villain that's totally believable. Fire the writers.
Feels a lot more like a routine sequel - bigger, louder, and packed with more brutal villains, action, and explosions, but with only an okay plot. The stakes never feel as gripping as they could be, and the comedy lands just fine but nothing more. Strong family vibes throughout, but the story is fairly predictable. Still a fun ride, just not as fresh as the first.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThis is Timo Tjahjanto's American directorial debut. Tjahjanto is best known for his ultra-violent Indonesian action films like Headshot (2016), The Night Comes for Us (2018) and Fuera de las sombras (2024).
- ErroresAt the blackjack table, the high-roller has 10 and 8 and decides to split his hand. Blackjack only allows you to split if you have a pair.
- Citas
Becca Mansell: Don't fuck with a mama bear.
- ConexionesFeatured in Minty Comedic Arts: Nobody 2 REVIEW (2025)
- Bandas sonorasThe Good Life
Written by Jean Broussolle, Sacha Distel, Jack Reardon
Performed by Jose James (as José James)
Produced by Dominic Lewis
José James appears courtesy of Rainbow Blonde Records
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 25,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 21,080,280
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 9,251,190
- 17 ago 2025
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 36,864,152
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 29min(89 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta