Beezel
- 2024
- 1h 21min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.9/10
1.8 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un horrible incidente que involucra a un niño revela la presencia malévola de una antigua bruja que reside dentro de las paredes del sótano.Un horrible incidente que involucra a un niño revela la presencia malévola de una antigua bruja que reside dentro de las paredes del sótano.Un horrible incidente que involucra a un niño revela la presencia malévola de una antigua bruja que reside dentro de las paredes del sótano.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Victoria Fradkin
- Nova
- (as Victoria Fratz Fradkin)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I haven't enjoyed such a mediocre film this much in a long time. Aaron Fradkin is truly a skilled filmmaker. He understands the material he has and is aware of the kind of film he can create with it, doing his absolute best within the given framework. The end result isn't a high-scoring, blockbuster masterpiece with a massive budget, but rather a mid-level film with a limited budget and even limited chances of theatrical release... And within its genre, the film is truly a cult classic.
Please watch this movie and similar movies with this logic... And please appreciate such cinema workers.
I hope this movie gets a chance to be sold on blu-ray or at least on itunes.
Please watch this movie and similar movies with this logic... And please appreciate such cinema workers.
I hope this movie gets a chance to be sold on blu-ray or at least on itunes.
When I rate a film "7", It means excellence. There are no "10"'s after all, and few "8"s or 9s".
Beezel, operating on a budget level, pulls off the prize: a creative, well-shot, interesting, and frightening movie that puts the big budget productions to shame.
The story is believable due to the actors, and the techniques are great.
I think more movies of this style should be made. A low -key horror film that is stylish and makes sense story-wise cannot be that rare. Yet it is.
Perhaps the film poster is inappropriate for the film, or the studio description is wrong, but the actual movie is better different than what is publicized.
It's about a witch that occupies a home for 60 years, and how the witch haunts the different generations of families who live there.
It's a bit like "Barbarian", yes, only better in that it is less over-the-top.
Enjoy!
Beezel, operating on a budget level, pulls off the prize: a creative, well-shot, interesting, and frightening movie that puts the big budget productions to shame.
The story is believable due to the actors, and the techniques are great.
I think more movies of this style should be made. A low -key horror film that is stylish and makes sense story-wise cannot be that rare. Yet it is.
Perhaps the film poster is inappropriate for the film, or the studio description is wrong, but the actual movie is better different than what is publicized.
It's about a witch that occupies a home for 60 years, and how the witch haunts the different generations of families who live there.
It's a bit like "Barbarian", yes, only better in that it is less over-the-top.
Enjoy!
If you approach this movie understanding it is a low budget project, and don't have expectations of high end CGI etc., it is an enjoyable 80 odd minutes. The acting is passable, if a little clumsy at times, the story is not radical, but original enough. It is roughly split into four segments, but all one story as it develops through the years. I think, of the four segments, I enjoyed the first one, with the documentary maker the most. The last segment, and the longest one, did seem to drag a little, and had the most unrelatable characters, as I really didn't care if they survived or not. The ending was disappointing, and really didn't leave me satisfied. But having said that, I did enjoy, and would definitely check out another movie from the same team.
What an impressive contained horror film! Not unlike Sinister or Barbarian, Beezel takes a single location and succeeds in building out an intriguing, unnerving lore, replete with a badass creature design for the witch (who, in classic Hitchockian fashion, appears only briefly- so much spookier than a ghoulie who's crammed down your throat!).
The use of found footage adds to the atmosphere (very Longlegs) without being overly used or trope-y. And like any horror movie worth it's salt, Beezel has a spine-tingling sound design that will haunt your dreams.
Grateful I don't have a basement-- I would never being going in it again!
The use of found footage adds to the atmosphere (very Longlegs) without being overly used or trope-y. And like any horror movie worth it's salt, Beezel has a spine-tingling sound design that will haunt your dreams.
Grateful I don't have a basement-- I would never being going in it again!
I agree with a lot of the positive and negative reviews on here. I think this film has both elements.
I have a soft spot for low-budget indie horror. Beezel definitely gives that feel. The story spans nearly 50 years (beginning in 1966), but the entire film gives a 70's vibe... even in 2013.
I love a retro horror film. But doing the retro thing seems to be the go-to with a lot of horror films lately... especially set in 70's or 80's. It works when it's part of the plot. But a lot of horror filmmakers seem to use this throwback style of filmmaking even when it's not really relevant to the plot.
The story is told in 4 different chapters, each with different characters. The first 3 build up like a slow burn, each giving us a closer glimpse of the horror that dwells in the cellar of a house... but doesn't give us much more than that. The less is more thing worked for me. It made those glimpses scarier.
By the time Beezel gets to its last (and longest) chapter, it kinda fizzles out into a plot that feels stale... and the characters aren't very likable, which didn't really make me care about what happened to them.
Part of me would've liked to have learned more of the backstory/origin of the evil thing in the cellar. But another part me appreciated the ambiguity. Maybe we'll learn more if there's a sequel.
I have a soft spot for low-budget indie horror. Beezel definitely gives that feel. The story spans nearly 50 years (beginning in 1966), but the entire film gives a 70's vibe... even in 2013.
I love a retro horror film. But doing the retro thing seems to be the go-to with a lot of horror films lately... especially set in 70's or 80's. It works when it's part of the plot. But a lot of horror filmmakers seem to use this throwback style of filmmaking even when it's not really relevant to the plot.
The story is told in 4 different chapters, each with different characters. The first 3 build up like a slow burn, each giving us a closer glimpse of the horror that dwells in the cellar of a house... but doesn't give us much more than that. The less is more thing worked for me. It made those glimpses scarier.
By the time Beezel gets to its last (and longest) chapter, it kinda fizzles out into a plot that feels stale... and the characters aren't very likable, which didn't really make me care about what happened to them.
Part of me would've liked to have learned more of the backstory/origin of the evil thing in the cellar. But another part me appreciated the ambiguity. Maybe we'll learn more if there's a sequel.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaBEEZEL was shot in the director's childhood house and he used nightmares from childhood as scares in the film.
- ErroresNova finds a box in the basement with video and audio footage. However, the police involvement in the disappearance of the three hospice workers means any such material would've been boxed up and taken as evidence. It certainly wouldn't have been left lying in the open.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Terrorífica
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 21min(81 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta