Sorprendentes observaciones médicas sobre las heridas de JFK cuando siete médicos que estuvieron en Urgencias del Hospital Parkland se reúnen para hablar de un día que ninguno de ellos podrá... Leer todoSorprendentes observaciones médicas sobre las heridas de JFK cuando siete médicos que estuvieron en Urgencias del Hospital Parkland se reúnen para hablar de un día que ninguno de ellos podrá olvidar.Sorprendentes observaciones médicas sobre las heridas de JFK cuando siete médicos que estuvieron en Urgencias del Hospital Parkland se reúnen para hablar de un día que ninguno de ellos podrá olvidar.
Ronald C. Jones
- Self - Chief Resident, Parkland Hospital, 1963
- (as Dr. Ronald Jones)
Lawrence E. Klein
- Self - 3rd Year Medical Student, Parkland Hospital, 1963
- (as Dr. Lawrence Klein)
Joe D. Goldstrich
- Self - 4th Year Medical Student, Parkland Hospital, 1963
- (as Dr. Joe D. Goldstrich)
Kenneth Salyer
- Self - 1st Year Resident, Parkland Hospital, 1963
- (as Dr. Kenneth Salyer)
Robert McClelland
- Self - Assistant Professor of Surgery, Parkland Hospital, 1963
- (as Dr. Robert McClelland)
Peter M. Loeb
- Self - 3rd Year Medical Student, Parkland Hospital, 1963
- (as Dr. Peter Loeb)
Donald W. Seldin
- Self - Chief of Medicine, Parkland Hospital, 1963
- (as Dr. Donald Seldin)
Matt Crumpton
- Self - Investigative Journalist, Creator of 'Solving JFK' Podcast
- (as Matt Crumpton Esq)
Charles Baxter
- Self - Assistant Professor of Surgery, Parkland Hospital, 1963
- (material de archivo)
- (as Dr. Charles Baxter)
Audrey Bell
- Self - Operating Room Supervisor, Parkland Hospital, 1963
- (material de archivo)
- (as Nurse Audrey Bell)
Hale Boggs
- Self - Member of the Warren Commission
- (material de archivo)
J. Thornton Boswell
- Self - Chief of Pathology, Bethesda Naval Hospital, 1963
- (material de archivo)
James Carrico
- Self - Surgery Resident, Parkland Hospital, 1963
- (material de archivo)
- (as Dr. James Carrico)
Kemp Clark
- Self - Chief of Neurosurgery, Parkland Hospital, 1963
- (material de archivo)
- (as Dr. Kemp Clark)
Opiniones destacadas
I have always dismissed those who believed that there was a second shooter in JFKs assasination. I thought that they were just a bunch of conspiracy theorists who were trying to get some TV coverage. Most of them were easy to dismiss and basically odd balls as far as I was concerned. I was 13 when it happened and I remember everything vividly. I saw Lee Harvey Oswald get shot on live TV. Maybe I was just naive but I never thought that it happened any differently than the way the government said that it happened but now I do. The Parkland doctors are nothing but totally professional and believable. And so was the Autopsy Corpsman in Bethesda. Watch it yourself. You will believe it too. The evidence is all on their side.
One thing that I always disagree about concerning the assassination is that I've stood on the grassy knoll behind the fence and "lined up the shot". I am a hunter and avid shooter and know how bullets react. If a shot had been fired from behind the fence, and struck Kennedy where the "X" is marked on the street, it would have exited Kennedy and struck Jackie or blown out the LEFT-REAR of Kennedy's head. So the shot HAD to have come either from the front OR from the back. They always go through proving the shot from behind but not from the fence. This has always bothered me whenever I see documentaries on the subject.
This documentary shines a very bright light on the lies and deception by our government. It shows how little our government thinks the people they work for need to know.
This factually based documentary gives the actual doctors that were in the room on that fateful day November 22nd, 1963.
The lies our government told us made us question what really happened that day. This documentary gives not only the Doctors, but also witnesses a voice. It shines a new light on Lee Harvey Oswald.
It shows how far government overreach will go to protect what they don't want you to know.
I've been called a conspiracy theorist for thinking Oswald was framed. For thinking our government lied to us.
...... It's not a conspiracy when things are proven true.
This factually based documentary gives the actual doctors that were in the room on that fateful day November 22nd, 1963.
The lies our government told us made us question what really happened that day. This documentary gives not only the Doctors, but also witnesses a voice. It shines a new light on Lee Harvey Oswald.
It shows how far government overreach will go to protect what they don't want you to know.
I've been called a conspiracy theorist for thinking Oswald was framed. For thinking our government lied to us.
...... It's not a conspiracy when things are proven true.
First, I don't actually dispute this film's core contention -- even if it's not stated outright -- that Kennedy's body should have remained at Parkland Hospital, where a proper, complete autopsy could have been performed. Instead we got what could charitably be called an inept autopsy, at worst a deliberately manipulated one. It is not the fault of the Parkland doctors that JFK's body was removed (illegally confiscated would be a better word) by the Secret Service. But it is the fault of the creators of this film that they fail to differentiate legitimate avenues of inquiry from rank speculation.
I supposed after 60 years there are plenty of people who have no idea who Kennedy was, and who are fascinated by the b-roll background that makes up at least one-third of this film. But for someone like me who has lived with this stuff since he was a kid, much of this material felt redundant and unnecessary.
Still, with so many witnesses entering their golden years, it's good that they're getting on film at all.
I supposed after 60 years there are plenty of people who have no idea who Kennedy was, and who are fascinated by the b-roll background that makes up at least one-third of this film. But for someone like me who has lived with this stuff since he was a kid, much of this material felt redundant and unnecessary.
Still, with so many witnesses entering their golden years, it's good that they're getting on film at all.
I was 8 years old when JFK was killed so it would be ludicrous to pretend that I always suspected the treason. However, within just a few years I knew that that Warren Commission was pure nonsense. A few years after that I became versed in the why and how of assassinations (for instance, always kill the assassin). Over the years I have read or watched at least 4 exhaustive investigations. Strangely, US News & World Report, a respected conservative magazine, published a childishly amateur support of the Warren Report in the mid 90's, after it had already been discredited from both public and private sources. So I have been, for decades, aware of everything in this special: lies, fabrication, suppression, coverup, legal violations, planted evidence, Media cooperation, the entire inside job uniparty treason - except one thing - the accusation that the Russians did it. Wow....it seems like the News never actually changes. But there is a more important issue - whether you have absolute corroboration, like the Gulf of Tonkin fraud, or merely overwhelming evidence, like 9/11 stuff, the American people will never trust their government or media on any major issue again.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaSinger Lisa Loeb's father is Peter M. Loeb MD who tried to save the life of President Kennedy at Parkland Hospital on November 22, 1963.
- Citas
Lawrence E. Klein: It was a lie. They really didn't tell the truth about it.
- ConexionesFeatures Zapruder Film of Kennedy Assassination (1970)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- JFK Assassination: What Happened in the Trauma Room
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 32 minutos
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was JFK: What the Doctors Saw (2023) officially released in India in English?
Responda