Un slasher de terror ambiental que describe metódicamente la enigmática resurrección, desenfreno y venganza de un monstruo no muerto en una remota zona salvaje.Un slasher de terror ambiental que describe metódicamente la enigmática resurrección, desenfreno y venganza de un monstruo no muerto en una remota zona salvaje.Un slasher de terror ambiental que describe metódicamente la enigmática resurrección, desenfreno y venganza de un monstruo no muerto en una remota zona salvaje.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado y 7 nominaciones en total
J T Jacobs
- Johnny's Dad
- (voz)
- (as Tom Jacobs)
Lauren-Marie Taylor
- The Woman
- (as Lauren Taylor)
Matthew Ninaber
- Johnny
- (escenas eliminadas)
Matt Daciw
- Johnny
- (escenas eliminadas)
Richard Capotosto
- Johnny
- (escenas eliminadas)
Scott Marleau
- Johnny
- (escenas eliminadas)
Jeremy Ninaber
- The Ranger
- (escenas eliminadas)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
If I had to watch one more shot of the killer walking through the forest, a damn field, or some other picturesque landscape I would have sworn I was watching a 3rd person nature documentary.
I don't mind a film being slow for the sake of tension building or for a great payoff (think Jaws, slow but a HUGE payoff) but this was slow and tedious to the point I thought the director was having a joke at the watcher's expense. It genuinely went on for so long or so repetitively at times I particularly thought I was watching a satirical horror movie. Think of that scene in Monte Python and the Holy Grail where they replay the same scene of a knight running towards you over and over.
There were some original kills (credit where credit is due, the overlook kill was fantastic) but to see other reviews saying that it's horrifying, and the most frightening, gory film they've seen makes me question how much horror the reviewers have actually seen.
It's a more ambient Friday the 13th / Jason film and nothing more.
Walking out of the theater, I passed a man who turned to his wife and said, "Well, we'll never get that time back" and he's absolutely right.
I don't mind a film being slow for the sake of tension building or for a great payoff (think Jaws, slow but a HUGE payoff) but this was slow and tedious to the point I thought the director was having a joke at the watcher's expense. It genuinely went on for so long or so repetitively at times I particularly thought I was watching a satirical horror movie. Think of that scene in Monte Python and the Holy Grail where they replay the same scene of a knight running towards you over and over.
There were some original kills (credit where credit is due, the overlook kill was fantastic) but to see other reviews saying that it's horrifying, and the most frightening, gory film they've seen makes me question how much horror the reviewers have actually seen.
It's a more ambient Friday the 13th / Jason film and nothing more.
Walking out of the theater, I passed a man who turned to his wife and said, "Well, we'll never get that time back" and he's absolutely right.
Ever wonder what the killer in the woods is doing behind the scenes? In a Violent Nature answers that question. And it's a whole lot of walking around the woods.
This movie is a cool concept that sounds interesting on paper, but does not translate to screen. There is a complete lack of tension to the whole film. I think this is partially the way it's shot, but also because most (not all) of the time, we know where the killer is. The lack of music is also a detriment.
The killer is not interesting like a Jason or Freddy. And we don't get a chance to know the victims either because we are too busy watching the killer walk around in the forest. It makes for an experience I had nothing to attach myself to, and no one to root for.
The ADR is extremely distracting, and the performances and dialogue are not good. While I commend the movie for being excessively gory, and using all practical effects, I felt like I was watching aged effects. The dead bodies don't look real, and when thrown around they look very bad. I probably normally wouldn't care about this if I was locked into the movie, but I unfortunately was not.
I appreciate it for trying something new. But sometimes things are done a certain way for a reason. In this case, slashers should follow dumb teenagers, and not the silent killers. They are way more fun to watch.
This movie is a cool concept that sounds interesting on paper, but does not translate to screen. There is a complete lack of tension to the whole film. I think this is partially the way it's shot, but also because most (not all) of the time, we know where the killer is. The lack of music is also a detriment.
The killer is not interesting like a Jason or Freddy. And we don't get a chance to know the victims either because we are too busy watching the killer walk around in the forest. It makes for an experience I had nothing to attach myself to, and no one to root for.
The ADR is extremely distracting, and the performances and dialogue are not good. While I commend the movie for being excessively gory, and using all practical effects, I felt like I was watching aged effects. The dead bodies don't look real, and when thrown around they look very bad. I probably normally wouldn't care about this if I was locked into the movie, but I unfortunately was not.
I appreciate it for trying something new. But sometimes things are done a certain way for a reason. In this case, slashers should follow dumb teenagers, and not the silent killers. They are way more fun to watch.
This movie remembered me to Friday The 13th the videogame. I mean the camera work, the murders and filming locations are pretty close. Probably producers were inspired by Friday the 13th original movie but they've tried to give a new vision. The result is not as good, nor original and the overall product seems too simplistic (even a slasher).
First, the story is inexistent and it's the usual one if you have watched similar slashers.
Second, the overall result is a cheap copy of Friday the 13th (Even 2009 version is better than this one).
Last, the murders are the best here. It doesn't look cheap for a B movie.
So, overall a wasted opportunity with so much potential. I recommend this one only to slashers B-grade fans. Other than that skip. There are other several good classics from the 80's like Nightmare on Elm street, Christine, Halloween or Alien.
First, the story is inexistent and it's the usual one if you have watched similar slashers.
Second, the overall result is a cheap copy of Friday the 13th (Even 2009 version is better than this one).
Last, the murders are the best here. It doesn't look cheap for a B movie.
So, overall a wasted opportunity with so much potential. I recommend this one only to slashers B-grade fans. Other than that skip. There are other several good classics from the 80's like Nightmare on Elm street, Christine, Halloween or Alien.
60% of the film involves watching the back of a guy walking through the woods.
35% of the film involves watching really bad actors do things that make zero sense.
20% of the film involves outrageously overdone scenes of inexplicable violence.
15% of the film is listening to stupid stories that make no sense, particularly the last one.
That doesn't add up to 100% because these things overlap.
It's a garbage movie with no plot, terrible acting, terrible delivery, terrible effects, pointless and over-the-top violence, and it ends with nothing making sense and nothing having been said.
No story, no point, no conclusion, no content. Just garbage.
35% of the film involves watching really bad actors do things that make zero sense.
20% of the film involves outrageously overdone scenes of inexplicable violence.
15% of the film is listening to stupid stories that make no sense, particularly the last one.
That doesn't add up to 100% because these things overlap.
It's a garbage movie with no plot, terrible acting, terrible delivery, terrible effects, pointless and over-the-top violence, and it ends with nothing making sense and nothing having been said.
No story, no point, no conclusion, no content. Just garbage.
Disclaimer: this film is only intended for slasher fans. Ones who love the cliches and tropes of the genre and want to see them flipped on their head and played around with. The change of POV, the off camera kills slowly dwindling away until everything in its practical effects glory is displayed with a refusal to turn the camera from anything, and the (in a good way) head scratching ending.
This review isn't to gatekeep this film, it's just to let people know who the intended audience is. I've seen many films where I wasn't the intended audience and the point of the film was lost on me. The early review to this film were very negative so I was bracing for a bad time but was surprised. This is one of those rare love letters to the genre that really requires additional watching of at least the classics to see what the director was going for. Otherwise it's just going to seem like senseless kills and walking around with no substance, where the true substance lies in the established features of the genre itself that it puts its twist on.
Overall a fun time with some genuinely great moments and a must watch for slasher fans.
This review isn't to gatekeep this film, it's just to let people know who the intended audience is. I've seen many films where I wasn't the intended audience and the point of the film was lost on me. The early review to this film were very negative so I was bracing for a bad time but was surprised. This is one of those rare love letters to the genre that really requires additional watching of at least the classics to see what the director was going for. Otherwise it's just going to seem like senseless kills and walking around with no substance, where the true substance lies in the established features of the genre itself that it puts its twist on.
Overall a fun time with some genuinely great moments and a must watch for slasher fans.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaWhen referring to the no musical score nature of the film, director Chris Nash stated that he wanted the film to be a "blank canvas", and to be as "stark and objective" as possible. He didn't want to influence the audience by any type of music.
- Errores(at around 33 mins) When the display cabinet is shown in the ranger station, a small poster misspells "among" as "amoung".
- ConexionesFeatured in Half in the Bag: Top 10 Horror Movies (2024) Part 1 (2024)
- Bandas sonorasLessons Not Learned (The 1980 Damascus Missile Explosion)
Written and Performed by Jess Lane
Courtesy of Jess Lane
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- De naturaleza violenta
- Locaciones de filmación
- Kawartha Lakes, Ontario, Canadá(set locations)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 4,229,999
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 2,155,346
- 2 jun 2024
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 4,561,656
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 34min(94 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta