Pecadores

Sinners impresses early with its stunning cinematography and solid performances. The film sets a moody, atmospheric tone and builds tension with a deliberate, slow-burn approach that hints at something truly impactful. Unfortunately, that promise is never fulfilled. When the vampires finally appear, the film takes a sharp downturn. Their behavior is nonsensical, lacking any real menace or intelligence, and they end up feeling more like a parody than a threat. It's a baffling creative choice that undermines everything the first half works so hard to build. Despite its strong technical elements, the film stumbles badly at the finish line. A stylish misfire-watchable, but disappointing. 6 out of 10.

I'm a big fan of Ryan C and also most of the cast so I had high expectations this would be well directed and acted.

Unfortunately the back story is decent for the one part based on the twin brothers but then mid way it switches to another film that has some crazy vampires with no back story so it's very confusing.

I loved the first half as it had great blues and 1930/40 vibes but if you're looking for horror/ vampires you can skip the first hour as it really has little impact on what suddenly appears in the last 30 mins which is another film with cool effects and vampire mayhem -

But be prepared to scratch your head wondering what was the writer smoking and it just accelerates into something bizarre yet original in its scatological premise.

At least from Dusk till dawn makes a mockery of its premise while this film is being played straight laced so it felt more like it was an after thought to blend the two - and for me it just did not work and was confusing like writer was unable to connect the dots.

Go in with super low expectations and maybe you'll enjoy it as our group all came out with similar results of paying kudos to great directing, cgi and acting but it was a confusing bizarre experience.

5 stars for directing and acting.

This is a film with a grand ambition of creating a unique mix of mindless entertainment with a deeper meaning. But ultimately suffers from a too long and frankly unnecessary exposition, characters that are campy and uninteresting (except Miles Caton, who for his voice alone stands feet apart from everyone else), and two Michael B Jordans-seemingly created with a sole purpose of an ideological face off toward the end-that you cannot tell apart even when they are in the same frame. In its bid to be more than your average vampire horror flick, and a not-in-your-face history cultural moment, the film doesn't deliver on either promise. All in all, it fails at being serious or fun.

The 5 stars are the for the beautiful sets and the music, which is pretty dope.

It feels like The Sinners was directed by two different Cooglers-one responsible for the first half, and another for the second. If I had to rate them separately: the first half is a solid 8, the second a disappointing 4.

The film starts off brilliantly. Set in the Deep South during the 1930s, it plunges us into a world of chain gangs, overt racism, and raw human struggle-all wrapped in the soul of music. The characters are distinctive and memorable, the performances are top-notch, and the world-building is rich and atmospheric. It's a western, a drama, and a musical all at once, and somehow it works. For a while.

Then comes the second half.

This is where things fall apart. The pivot to horror-specifically vampires-feels abrupt and half-hearted. There's barely a story holding it together, and the horror/action sequences barely last 10-15 minutes. They lack any real suspense or memorable set pieces. The execution feels rushed and undercooked, especially after such a powerful setup.

The final 5-7 minutes attempt a bold anti-Klan message, and it's likely this moment of violence and symbolism that won over many critics. But for me, it was too little, too late.

What's most frustrating is the wasted potential. This could've been a truly unique vampire film-rooted in history, rich in theme, driven by character and song. Instead, it leaves you wondering what could've been if the second half had lived up to the promise of the first.

First of all: this is not a horrible movie, but it sure as hell isn't what the ratings make it out to be. It's sort of like From Dusk Till Dawn, but then with a predictable and not so good second half. And, as is the problem with a lot of movies these days: it's about an hour too long.

I really liked the first half. Up until the scene wherein Sammy makes music at the Juke Joint, which seems wildly out of place to me. It wasn't funny, smart and totally unnecessary in my opinion. Everything after that was cliche, full of the standard horror tropes and just not that good in my opinion. The acting is pretty good, the imagery is beautiful, but all in all it really falls short as a horror movie and overstays its welcome by a long shot.