Años después de que Tess y Anna sufrieran una crisis de identidad, Anna ahora tiene una hija y una hijastra. Enfrentan los desafíos que se presentan cuando dos familias se fusionan. Tess y A... Leer todoAños después de que Tess y Anna sufrieran una crisis de identidad, Anna ahora tiene una hija y una hijastra. Enfrentan los desafíos que se presentan cuando dos familias se fusionan. Tess y Anna descubren que un rayo puede caer dos veces.Años después de que Tess y Anna sufrieran una crisis de identidad, Anna ahora tiene una hija y una hijastra. Enfrentan los desafíos que se presentan cuando dos familias se fusionan. Tess y Anna descubren que un rayo puede caer dos veces.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Christina Vidal
- Maddie
- (as Christina Vidal Mitchell)
Opiniones destacadas
There are actually three iterations of "Freaky Friday," including the 1976 one with Jodie Foster, the one with Shelley Long in 1995, and the one with Jamie Lee and Lindsay from 2003. This is the only one with a sequel, and for the most part, it's a fun ride.
For Jamie Lee, she might have longed for a chance to do something fun besides the endless "Halloween" rehashes, and for Lindsay, it's just nice to see her in a major movie again after Jamie Lee coaxed her into it (according to the trivia entries) and they are both part of the producer team.
This movie demands your full attention and almost completely requires the viewer to have seen the first one because there are so many nods to it. Without giving too much away, this time there are four, count 'em, four people involved in the body swap, and sometimes it did get confusing to follow who is in whose body.
Maybe the best thing is that it has captured the spirit of the best live-action Disney comedies going back decades because of the mix of silly fun and sentimentality. It also has relatable bits for today's teens, millennials, Gen X-ers, and of course boomers. Even young children will enjoy the spectacle of a food fight in an earlier scene and older people acting silly in later scenes, such as by careening around in a classic Chevy Camaro.
The men involved make the most of their roles, too as with Manny Jacinto, Annabelle's new love interest, Chad Michael Murray reappearing as Jake from the first one (and STILL uncannily attracted to Jamie Lee's Tess), and of course handsome Mark Harmon radiates California cool halfway into his seventh decade.
It all comes to a very satisfying close in a musical way which, the less said about it the better. It's very joyful and ties up all the loose ends nicely, kind of a payoff for the earlier jokes that don't land as well, some earlier scenes that seem tacked on and the earlier-mentioned challenge of keeping up with who's who.
For Jamie Lee, she might have longed for a chance to do something fun besides the endless "Halloween" rehashes, and for Lindsay, it's just nice to see her in a major movie again after Jamie Lee coaxed her into it (according to the trivia entries) and they are both part of the producer team.
This movie demands your full attention and almost completely requires the viewer to have seen the first one because there are so many nods to it. Without giving too much away, this time there are four, count 'em, four people involved in the body swap, and sometimes it did get confusing to follow who is in whose body.
Maybe the best thing is that it has captured the spirit of the best live-action Disney comedies going back decades because of the mix of silly fun and sentimentality. It also has relatable bits for today's teens, millennials, Gen X-ers, and of course boomers. Even young children will enjoy the spectacle of a food fight in an earlier scene and older people acting silly in later scenes, such as by careening around in a classic Chevy Camaro.
The men involved make the most of their roles, too as with Manny Jacinto, Annabelle's new love interest, Chad Michael Murray reappearing as Jake from the first one (and STILL uncannily attracted to Jamie Lee's Tess), and of course handsome Mark Harmon radiates California cool halfway into his seventh decade.
It all comes to a very satisfying close in a musical way which, the less said about it the better. It's very joyful and ties up all the loose ends nicely, kind of a payoff for the earlier jokes that don't land as well, some earlier scenes that seem tacked on and the earlier-mentioned challenge of keeping up with who's who.
Freakier Friday (2025) is the sequel to Freaky Friday (2003), a movie that is really insane and entertaining to watch. Now to be fair, I was a little worried if the filmmakers were going to be able to make a good sequel to that movie because Disney has had a rough couple of years, but I'm happy to say that this movie was good.
Positives for Freakier Friday (2025): Lindsay Lohan and Jamie Lee Curtis kill it in this movie and they recapture the magic and charm of their performances from the 2003 movie while also being in different places in life. It feels like they never left these roles and they set down into these characters like the 2003 movie came out last year. I did like some of the new characters particularly Julia Butters and Sophia Hammons as the two stepdaughters of Lindsay Lohan's character. You do get some nice callbacks of the 2003 movies and they didn't feel like cheap fan service. The plot of the movie is different enough from the original to help it stand out instead of feeling like a cheap copy of what happened 22 years ago with the characters. And finally, the insanity of the premise is still intact with everything that happens in this movie and that make me very happy.
Mixed for Freakier Friday (2025): There is still a nature to the story not making any logical sense as to what is going on, but I don't care because I was having fun with it.
Negatives for Freakier Friday (2025): The movie does feel it is overstuffed with subplots and characters who feel like they shouldn't even be here and they did drag the movie a a lot for me. Honestly, I did forget some of the subplots as they felt so random and pointless that if you took them out of the story, you would still have the same movie. And finally, there is one scene that literally exists for product placement and it was so hilariously dumb that this scene actually made it into the final product.
Overall, Freakier Friday (2025) is a good continuation of the 2003 movie and it was fun to see these characters getting back to the insanity of the story from 22 years ago and I am happy to say that.
Positives for Freakier Friday (2025): Lindsay Lohan and Jamie Lee Curtis kill it in this movie and they recapture the magic and charm of their performances from the 2003 movie while also being in different places in life. It feels like they never left these roles and they set down into these characters like the 2003 movie came out last year. I did like some of the new characters particularly Julia Butters and Sophia Hammons as the two stepdaughters of Lindsay Lohan's character. You do get some nice callbacks of the 2003 movies and they didn't feel like cheap fan service. The plot of the movie is different enough from the original to help it stand out instead of feeling like a cheap copy of what happened 22 years ago with the characters. And finally, the insanity of the premise is still intact with everything that happens in this movie and that make me very happy.
Mixed for Freakier Friday (2025): There is still a nature to the story not making any logical sense as to what is going on, but I don't care because I was having fun with it.
Negatives for Freakier Friday (2025): The movie does feel it is overstuffed with subplots and characters who feel like they shouldn't even be here and they did drag the movie a a lot for me. Honestly, I did forget some of the subplots as they felt so random and pointless that if you took them out of the story, you would still have the same movie. And finally, there is one scene that literally exists for product placement and it was so hilariously dumb that this scene actually made it into the final product.
Overall, Freakier Friday (2025) is a good continuation of the 2003 movie and it was fun to see these characters getting back to the insanity of the story from 22 years ago and I am happy to say that.
This was honestly a lot better than I expected it to be. I went in with very low expectations and wanted to see it just for a shout out to my childhood but it was honestly hilarious. I was laughing almost the whole movie. Jamie Lee Curtis is so funny and the return of Chad Michael Murray as Jake. Love it. Go see this movie if you are from my generation. Trust me it's hilarious.
I'm sure people who liked the first one, will like this one as well. However, for some reason I think that 35+ year old people will appreciate it more than youngsters, especially us millenial Lindsey Lohan fans who grew up with her excellent movies in the 90s and 00s. I must admit I'm really happy she got her life back together and is acting again.
On the negative side, it would have been a bit better if this was a 90 minute movie, which I find to be a perfect length for comedies. I really hope that Naked Gun and this movie will be the start of a big screen comedy comeback because last 10 years have been horrible to comedies.
On the negative side, it would have been a bit better if this was a 90 minute movie, which I find to be a perfect length for comedies. I really hope that Naked Gun and this movie will be the start of a big screen comedy comeback because last 10 years have been horrible to comedies.
The most enjoyable thing about body swaps is truly getting to see the actor become the other character. Face/Off, Big, 13 Going on 30, both Freaky Fridays, etc - you really feel the role reversal. That's what made the 2003 version so endearing, you really enjoyed the characters trapped in the other body like it actually happened. I'd say JLC was really the only one that truly succeeded in that regard here. *Saying* dialog or wearing different clothes or being uncomfortable doesn't cut it. Lilo was enjoyable all around, but she didn't truly take on the other character as well as last time. Probably because the teens weren't that memorable as JLC and Lilo swapping were. And the dual swaps with actors that aren't as memorable for their caricatures or impressions made the movie really confusing, and I was continually using too much brain power to try and remember who was really who, and a good body swap shouldn't have that problem.
I'm a little frustrated with the marketing, that we've been fed so much of the legacy characters, to spend so much time with these newcomers. I get the need to reach all audiences, so I know there's no way around that, but I would have loved to see more involvement from Mark Harmon (Tess' husband Ryan) and Ryan Margarini (Anna's younger brother). Chad Michael Murray (Jake) was also under utilized, as well as Pink Slip. There were more included from the legacy cast than I expected, but they were too short.
Overall I laughed and cried and smiled, but having Tess' husband and Anna's younger brother swap would have been more fun than two newcomers. I was a little too confused to say that I enjoyed it more than the first one, and the characters broke reality a few too many times with jokes for the sake of age rather than what characters would realistically do. As an editor myself, the movie could have lost about 10 minutes for better comedy pacing.
This film won't be remembered for its stellar body swapping, but younger audiences will for sure enjoy the antics and everyone with a heart will get the feels at the end, and the family might just be a little closer to each other. For everyone's sake, I hope the film makes a profit so we can see Freakiest Friday in 20 years - but please, have JLC and Lilo swap places again.
I'm a little frustrated with the marketing, that we've been fed so much of the legacy characters, to spend so much time with these newcomers. I get the need to reach all audiences, so I know there's no way around that, but I would have loved to see more involvement from Mark Harmon (Tess' husband Ryan) and Ryan Margarini (Anna's younger brother). Chad Michael Murray (Jake) was also under utilized, as well as Pink Slip. There were more included from the legacy cast than I expected, but they were too short.
Overall I laughed and cried and smiled, but having Tess' husband and Anna's younger brother swap would have been more fun than two newcomers. I was a little too confused to say that I enjoyed it more than the first one, and the characters broke reality a few too many times with jokes for the sake of age rather than what characters would realistically do. As an editor myself, the movie could have lost about 10 minutes for better comedy pacing.
This film won't be remembered for its stellar body swapping, but younger audiences will for sure enjoy the antics and everyone with a heart will get the feels at the end, and the family might just be a little closer to each other. For everyone's sake, I hope the film makes a profit so we can see Freakiest Friday in 20 years - but please, have JLC and Lilo swap places again.
How Well Does the 'Freakier Friday' Cast Know Each Other?
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaIt was Jamie Lee Curtis who contacted the head of Disney with the idea to make a second film. She persuaded Lindsay Lohan to return to Disney as the two became close friends after the 2003 film.
- ErroresThe character Eric has a generic UK accent at the start of the film, but this goes in and out. By the end, his accent is distinctly North American.
- Créditos curiososAs the closing credits started rolling, there is an additional scene of Dr. Tess Colman's new book being shown, along with the photo used to promote the book.
- ConexionesFeatured in Jeremy Jahns: Freakier Friday - Movie Review (2025)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Freakier Friday
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 42,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 83,688,227
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 28,583,167
- 10 ago 2025
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 135,069,222
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 50min(110 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta