Un grupo de adolescentes se adentra en un parque sin saber de la presencia de un ratón mutante que irá acabando con cada uno.Un grupo de adolescentes se adentra en un parque sin saber de la presencia de un ratón mutante que irá acabando con cada uno.Un grupo de adolescentes se adentra en un parque sin saber de la presencia de un ratón mutante que irá acabando con cada uno.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Thomas K. Murphy
- Michael
- (as Thomas Murphy)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I literally had to make an IMDB account to give this movie a review. Me and my sister always try to find the dumbest movies on Tubi to watch. I'm a huge horror fan and she gets scared easily, so we try to just watch silly things.
This is likely the worst movie I've ever seen. It was laughable. Bad sound effects, the story didn't flow, why was Pooh from Blood and Honey in it? People would be in one setting one minute then a different one in 2 seconds. And there was a moment where something SO STUPID happens I mean had NOTHING to do with the story. I don't know how this was funded or made. I genuinely appreciate independent cinema, but this was like a teenager with a camera wanted to make a movie with his friends or something. If you wanna laugh and waste a couple hours of time I would deff check this one out.
This is likely the worst movie I've ever seen. It was laughable. Bad sound effects, the story didn't flow, why was Pooh from Blood and Honey in it? People would be in one setting one minute then a different one in 2 seconds. And there was a moment where something SO STUPID happens I mean had NOTHING to do with the story. I don't know how this was funded or made. I genuinely appreciate independent cinema, but this was like a teenager with a camera wanted to make a movie with his friends or something. If you wanna laugh and waste a couple hours of time I would deff check this one out.
I usually give low budget films credit but I could not with this one.
This film had me hooked! Sure there were a few bad bits of dialogue and acting but that's what comes with low budget films and I love it! But then the ending arrived... And the whole film just collapsed and fell apart.
This editing had to be (I'm sorry to the editor but I have to be brutally honest.) some of the WORST editing I have ever seen. The sound effects are absolutely awful and the attempt at CGI is absolutely laughable.
Lewis Santer brought this film alive with his acting, but other than that, there's not a lot of good things to say. The editing, CGI, and sound work drag this film down extremely. The dialogue is pretty bad too.
I'm not even sure if this or The Mouse Trap was worse. That's saying a lot because The Mouse Trap was straight ass. Stop making Mickey Mouse horror films because there is no right way to do it.
This film had me hooked! Sure there were a few bad bits of dialogue and acting but that's what comes with low budget films and I love it! But then the ending arrived... And the whole film just collapsed and fell apart.
This editing had to be (I'm sorry to the editor but I have to be brutally honest.) some of the WORST editing I have ever seen. The sound effects are absolutely awful and the attempt at CGI is absolutely laughable.
Lewis Santer brought this film alive with his acting, but other than that, there's not a lot of good things to say. The editing, CGI, and sound work drag this film down extremely. The dialogue is pretty bad too.
I'm not even sure if this or The Mouse Trap was worse. That's saying a lot because The Mouse Trap was straight ass. Stop making Mickey Mouse horror films because there is no right way to do it.
Not as bad as the rating would suggest, it's quite abit better then I'd of presumed and going into this I was heavily excited. The location was fun, the funfair makes for some great looking views and scares, and ultimately it was more fun then it had any right of being.
The Mouse was scary, and he had multiple abilities that is what made him terrifying. And the fact he had a creepy smile, Hauntingly brilliant teeth, and a weapon made him a threat and made him seem scarier then he could of been. So fair play to the props team. Winnie the Pooh costume is also here, and his costume is fine, but what made him scary was his slowness, calmness and he could hit you at any moment and you wouldn't notice. The fight scenes between the villains added a nice spark.
The bad bits would be the story could have been more fleshed out, as theirs the kills and the final stage that took up quite abit of time, for me it would of worked more had it been more fleshed out and took that time to establish some of the folklaw of the villains, and some more material to work with, when near the villains as that would of given it the chill.
The script is great as you can really feel the characters are friends, and even the first part was also good and the scenes were played out nicely which was also good. The script was great but again it had of been better if they had more material to work with when the villains were near it would of been great, but it's still a good script so it deserves some props.
The Movie is short in terms of story, and simple to follow, but a more fleshed out film with more of the folklaw, with slightly more bonding near the villains and everything would of made it a Good film, but it's not bad and I think it's Average Entertainment.
I'd rate this film a 4 Because half of it is good, and the minor flaws and a few suggestions I made would improve the film. Not bad though, either.
The Mouse was scary, and he had multiple abilities that is what made him terrifying. And the fact he had a creepy smile, Hauntingly brilliant teeth, and a weapon made him a threat and made him seem scarier then he could of been. So fair play to the props team. Winnie the Pooh costume is also here, and his costume is fine, but what made him scary was his slowness, calmness and he could hit you at any moment and you wouldn't notice. The fight scenes between the villains added a nice spark.
The bad bits would be the story could have been more fleshed out, as theirs the kills and the final stage that took up quite abit of time, for me it would of worked more had it been more fleshed out and took that time to establish some of the folklaw of the villains, and some more material to work with, when near the villains as that would of given it the chill.
The script is great as you can really feel the characters are friends, and even the first part was also good and the scenes were played out nicely which was also good. The script was great but again it had of been better if they had more material to work with when the villains were near it would of been great, but it's still a good script so it deserves some props.
The Movie is short in terms of story, and simple to follow, but a more fleshed out film with more of the folklaw, with slightly more bonding near the villains and everything would of made it a Good film, but it's not bad and I think it's Average Entertainment.
I'd rate this film a 4 Because half of it is good, and the minor flaws and a few suggestions I made would improve the film. Not bad though, either.
I recently watched the UK film 🇬🇧 Mouse of Horrors (2025) on Tubi. The story follows Dr. Rupert and his latest creation-a killer mouse-who stalks a coastal city's amusement parks, collecting body parts in hopes that the doctor will build him a female companion.
Directed by Brendan Petrizzo (Devil's Triangle), the film stars Lewis Santer (Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2), Stephen Staley (Curse of Bloody Mary), Natasha Tosini (Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey), and Allie Moreno (Don't Blame Karma).
The premise, story, and overall execution are about as bad as you'd expect. That said, the kills and settings were exactly what I was hoping for. While there's an overuse of intestines-especially characters playing with them-the kill scenes are surprisingly entertaining, executed with intensity and more solid gore than I anticipated. I also appreciated the nods to the Pooh horror universe. Yes, the CGI corpses and flies were awful, but the kill sequences held my attention.
In conclusion, Mouse of Horrors is a bad movie, but it has a few elements that dedicated horror fans might enjoy. I'd rate it a 3.5/10 and only recommend it with the right expectations.
Directed by Brendan Petrizzo (Devil's Triangle), the film stars Lewis Santer (Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2), Stephen Staley (Curse of Bloody Mary), Natasha Tosini (Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey), and Allie Moreno (Don't Blame Karma).
The premise, story, and overall execution are about as bad as you'd expect. That said, the kills and settings were exactly what I was hoping for. While there's an overuse of intestines-especially characters playing with them-the kill scenes are surprisingly entertaining, executed with intensity and more solid gore than I anticipated. I also appreciated the nods to the Pooh horror universe. Yes, the CGI corpses and flies were awful, but the kill sequences held my attention.
In conclusion, Mouse of Horrors is a bad movie, but it has a few elements that dedicated horror fans might enjoy. I'd rate it a 3.5/10 and only recommend it with the right expectations.
It isn't all bad to be completely fair.
Save for some of the random victims, the acting's fine. The movie doesn't look inherently bad and the gore and kills are all decent to well done.
But the movie ignores the characters you're supposed to care about to a ridiculous level. That might be fine but there's little to no backstory or character interaction at all in the meantime. It's just killing. No rhyme, no reason, and more often than not, not entertaining.
Ultimately it's slow. There's shockingly little story and just focusing on the characters doesn't even happen. It's genuinely difficult to spoil anything about it.
Gratuitous. Kinda the only word.
I'd skip this one.
Save for some of the random victims, the acting's fine. The movie doesn't look inherently bad and the gore and kills are all decent to well done.
But the movie ignores the characters you're supposed to care about to a ridiculous level. That might be fine but there's little to no backstory or character interaction at all in the meantime. It's just killing. No rhyme, no reason, and more often than not, not entertaining.
Ultimately it's slow. There's shockingly little story and just focusing on the characters doesn't even happen. It's genuinely difficult to spoil anything about it.
Gratuitous. Kinda the only word.
I'd skip this one.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe killer mouse is named after The Killer that Wendy Williams would talk about on her show.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 24 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Mouse of Horrors (2025) officially released in India in English?
Responda