Maalik

Watch it only for Raj's phenominal acting. Story is something we all have seen numerous times. A good guy turned to a goon/mafia but it never gives the thrill except for a couple places. Everyone actor did justice to their role but it is the screenplay which does not keep you gripped. First half is extremely boring, it picks up only near interval. Misplaced/unwanted romantic song sequence.

It can be missed or just watch it on OTT.

Maalik (2025) : Movie Review -

Maalik finally brings Rajkummar Rao in a rugged, massy, action-packed avatar - a side we've rarely seen from the otherwise versatile actor. But unfortunately, even his intense screen presence isn't enough to salvage this outdated and tedious gangster drama. The film, written by Jyotsana Nath and directed by Pulkit, seems determined to stick to a template that has long run its course, offering nothing new or compelling in terms of storytelling or emotional depth.

The plot follows a young married man whose father, a servant (naukar), expects him to remain subservient. However, the son has bigger dreams - to become a Maalik, a master of his own fate. When his father is attacked, he retaliates with brutal violence, murdering the assailant in a public place and quickly rising to power. As he gains control over the local area and establishes himself as a feared don, new enemies emerge, threatening not just his kingdom but his family too. What follows is a barrage of gang wars, emotional outbursts, and a blood-soaked journey that feels more exhausting than exhilarating.

The biggest flaw of Maalik is its stale writing. It echoes the 90s-style gangster saga without adding a shred of originality. Each twist is telegraphed, every emotional beat feels recycled, and the pacing drags endlessly over a bloated runtime of nearly two and a half hours. The film lacks compelling conflicts, and whatever is presented feels hollow or overdone. Where recent films like Animal (2023) dared to blend artistry with brutality, Maalik merely copies the genre's worst clichés.

Rajkummar Rao does his best with what he's given. This is certainly his most commercial, mass-oriented performance, and while it's far from his best work, it's an interesting experiment in image reinvention. Sadly, he's let down by a weak script and uninspired direction. Manushi Chhillar has almost nothing to do except play the obligatory love interest, a role seen in countless gangster dramas before. Among the supporting cast, Prosenjit Chatterjee brings some gravitas, though his character arc is underwritten. Saurabh Sachdeva is effective in his limited screen time, while veterans like Saurabh Shukla and Swanand Kirkire manage to leave an impression despite the lack of substance. Others, including Anshumaan Pushkar, Rajendra Gupta, and Baljinder Kaur, remain forgettable in undercooked roles.

Technically, Maalik falters even further. The cinematography feels recycled, offering nothing fresh or dynamic in terms of visuals. The editing is sluggish, making the already stretched narrative feel even more monotonous. The background score, which should've heightened the film's tension, is underwhelming. Sachin-Jigar's music is passable at best, though thankfully not intrusive. Director Pulkit appears to be on autopilot here, delivering a film devoid of passion or urgency. There's no personal stamp or creative risk in the storytelling - it's as if the film was made by ticking boxes rather than telling a story that mattered. With a more daring script and tighter execution, Maalik might have become a gripping underworld saga. Instead, it ends up being a hollow shell, wasting time, talent, and opportunity. Overall, Maalik tries to roar but barely makes a whimper. Even with Rajkummar Rao going full throttle in action mode, the film fails to rise above its formulaic structure. It's yet another example of how star power alone can't compensate for poor storytelling. In short, as a film, Maalik fails to become a Maalik.

RATING - 4/10*

Mostly actors performed great. BUT Prosenjit Chatterjee was wasted. Repetitive after interval. BUT cinematography is perfect. I was reaallllyyy exited because of the trailer but the movie disappointed me a bit. But the great thing is that Rajkumar tried something different and he shines in it. The story has FLAWSSSSS but Maanushi's performed was too good in compare to his older works like samrath prithviraj. AND I LOVE THE GUY WHO WAS THE MENTOR OF MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA IN 12TH FAIL IN THIS MOVIE. SWANAND KIRKIRE sir was a add on in the film. But film was not able to explain the conflict between RAJKUMAR and SAURABH SHUKLA well and this point was stretched a bit. Overall fun watch for first time.

Poor character writing.

Rajkumar isn't as scary or menacing as he should have been.

Twists are unpredictable.

The whole story is about being Malik and Naukar in a cringe way.

The build up of the story could have been better. Can't comprehend the rest of the users comparing this to Satya and Vaastav .

It is far from it.

Rise and fall isn't justified.

Saurabh Sachdeva and Shukla kind of wasted is sad to see.

Such fine actors hired and given very average quality roles.

Shouldn't have a sequel .

As a Rajkumar fan this was surely disappointing.

Fight scenes could have been choreographed better too.

Why 1 star?

Script: completely predictable and uninspired.

Direction: lacks nuance or innovation.

Pacing: drags, especially post-intermission.

Characters: beyond Rao, most are one-dimensional or wasted roles.

Only the energy and charisma of Rao holds your gaze, but he's fighting a losing battle. The film does not respect your time or expectations. Maalik suffers from cliched storytelling that repeats gangster tropes without any fresh take

Rajkummar Rao's Acting ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (10/10) Story & Screenplay ⭐ (flat, clichéd) Editing & Pacing ⭐ (much too long) Action & Violence ⭐ (indulgent, hollow) Overall Film Quality ⭐ (unoriginal, forgettable)