How the Story Ends
- El episodio se transmitió el 4 abr 2025
- TV-MA
- 55min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.4/10
1.2 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Tomando el ejemplo de Stravinsky (o Picciotto, si ese es tu ambiente), los ritos de primavera de los Yellowjackets finalmente llegan a su fin. Misty recibe un pick-me up. Shauna se preocupa ... Leer todoTomando el ejemplo de Stravinsky (o Picciotto, si ese es tu ambiente), los ritos de primavera de los Yellowjackets finalmente llegan a su fin. Misty recibe un pick-me up. Shauna se preocupa por un problema pegajoso de Melissa.Tomando el ejemplo de Stravinsky (o Picciotto, si ese es tu ambiente), los ritos de primavera de los Yellowjackets finalmente llegan a su fin. Misty recibe un pick-me up. Shauna se preocupa por un problema pegajoso de Melissa.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Opiniones destacadas
The ninth episode of Yellowjackets Season 3, titled "How the Story Ends," directed by Ben Semanoff and crafted by series creators Ashley Lyle and Bart Nickerson, stands as a harrowing and emotionally charged penultimate chapter that relentlessly propels the series toward its season finale. This episode intricately weaves together the fractured dual timelines of 1996 and 1998, delivering gripping character drama, shocking plot twists, and thematic explorations of trauma, survival, betrayal, and the haunting persistence of the past.
The 1996 timeline plunges viewers deeper into the wilderness ordeal's deadly psychological and physical stakes. After Shauna's decisive rejection of the group's plan to seek rescue, tensions among the Yellowjackets explode into factionalism and violence. Shauna's iron-fisted control, supported by Lottie and Tai, sets the stage for escalating conflict as the fractious group grapples with dwindling trust and resource scarcity. One of the episode's most electric moments arises when Shauna holds Kodi at gunpoint to assert dominance, a sequence that powerfully encapsulates the visceral desperation and fractured leadership endemic to their survival dynamic. This control struggle culminates in high-stakes encounters that expose raw human desperation and the corroding effects of trauma on collective bonds.
A substantial narrative arc in the 1996 timeline involves the daring escape attempts and betrayals that fracture group cohesion. The freeing of Hannah and Kodi by Natalie and their ensuing clash with Shauna's faction culminate in violent chaos, reinforcing the symbolic and literal collapse of camaraderie under extreme pressures. The episode's bleak survivalism is portrayed without romanticization, invoking brutal realism alongside psychological horror, such as when Melissa, cornered and terrified, rebels violently, stabbing Kodi in a tense showdown. These moments underscore not only the characters' individual survival instincts but also how trauma distorts moral boundaries and human relationships.
Transitions to the 1998 timeline sharpen the series' psychological thriller aspects, especially through Shauna and Melissa's explosive confrontation that leaves bodily harm and emotional wounds in its wake. Melanie Lynskey's layered performance as Shauna conveys a complex mix of rage, pain, and fractured identity, culminating in a chilling moment where Shauna fires a shot that grazes Melissa, dramatically raising the stakes of their fraught relationship. The raw tension spills over with Loyalties shifting, alliances breaking, and the past's ghosts materially affecting the survivors' present - literally bleeding into their lives.
One of the most devastating and emotionally resonant moments unfolds with Van's death, a loss that reverberates deeply throughout the survivor group. The episode poignantly depicts Van's struggle and eventual demise from carbon monoxide poisoning, orchestrated by Melissa's calculated decision during a suffocating stand-off. The narrative intertwines this with Van's spectral journey, engaging with her younger self in a surreal, emotional meditation on fate, power, and identity. This scene, imbued with both heartbreak and haunting beauty, serves as a profound commentary on survival's costs and the psychological fractures that persist long after physical ordeals.
Director Ben Semanoff employs a taut yet emotionally evocative style throughout "How the Story Ends." The cinematography uses cold, muted tones that enhance the oppressive wilderness atmosphere, contrasting with claustrophobic indoor scenes brimming with tension and emotional strife. Editing choices sustain a rhythmic balance between suspenseful action sequences and introspective character moments, allowing the narrative's complicated thematic layers-including trust, betrayal, and the cyclical nature of trauma-to unfold with measured intensity. The sound design subtly shifts between naturalistic wilderness ambiance and unsettling silence or discord, amplifying unease.
Performances remain an episode highlight, with Sophie Nélisse's younger Shauna juxtaposed by Melanie Lynskey's adult portrayal of a woman unraveling under the weight of her past and present. Hilary Swank's Melissa embodies a chilling ambiguity-simultaneously vulnerable and ruthless-while Jasmin Savoy Brown's Tai oscillates between fragile stability and ominous transformation, especially in the episode's ambiguous closing moments. Courtney Eaton's Lottie and Joel McHale's Kodi also contribute significantly to the tense dynamics, their character arcs intensifying the vicious mosaic of survival, power, and betrayal.
Among the episode's standout scenes are the escalating gunpoint standoffs in the wilderness, the chaotic battle between factions, the tense standoff leading to Van's tragic death, and Van's ethereal interaction with her younger self-sequences that resonate with both visceral impact and psychological depth. The episode's pacing, while deliberate, effectively evokes a creeping sense of doom that reflects the inevitability embedded in the titular "How the Story Ends."
Thematically, the episode probes the inescapability of trauma's imprint and the ways survival compels characters to make brutal choices that haunt both their shared and individual stories. It interrogates the breakdown of community under duress and the fracturing of identity, especially focusing on how past horrors continually echo into the present. The idea of fate versus free will permeates the narrative, with characters caught in cycles of violence and loss seemingly beyond their control, raising existential questions about agency amid chaos.
Contextually, this episode situates Yellowjackets firmly within the lineage of psychological survival dramas that blend horror, mystery, and feminist narratives. Drawing implicit comparisons to literary and cinematic predecessors such as Lord of the Flies and Mare of Easttown, the episode balances primal survivalism with sophisticated character study. Its genre-bending approach, weaving supernatural undertones with stark realism, expands the cultural dialogue around trauma's depiction in media and its impact on identity, memory, and female relationships.
Critically, "How the Story Ends" received a broadly positive reception for its intense performances, narrative courage, and emotional weight, although some critiques pointed to pacing that felt uneven or moments where thematic ambitions outpaced narrative cohesion. Nevertheless, its willingness to embrace moral ambiguity, depict harrowing loss, and deepen psychological complexity affirms the series' compelling voice in contemporary television.
"How the Story Ends" serves as a powerful, unsettling penultimate episode that distills Yellowjackets Season 3's core strengths: forging a nuanced exploration of trauma, survival, and fractured identity, accented by visceral drama and haunting performances. It challenges viewers to confront the brutal realities and psychological costs of endurance, accentuating how the past irrevocably informs the present. The episode's harrowing storytelling and thematic daring compel reflection on the cycles of violence and the tenuous grip of humanity amid devastation, setting a tense and evocative stage for the season's finale.
The 1996 timeline plunges viewers deeper into the wilderness ordeal's deadly psychological and physical stakes. After Shauna's decisive rejection of the group's plan to seek rescue, tensions among the Yellowjackets explode into factionalism and violence. Shauna's iron-fisted control, supported by Lottie and Tai, sets the stage for escalating conflict as the fractious group grapples with dwindling trust and resource scarcity. One of the episode's most electric moments arises when Shauna holds Kodi at gunpoint to assert dominance, a sequence that powerfully encapsulates the visceral desperation and fractured leadership endemic to their survival dynamic. This control struggle culminates in high-stakes encounters that expose raw human desperation and the corroding effects of trauma on collective bonds.
A substantial narrative arc in the 1996 timeline involves the daring escape attempts and betrayals that fracture group cohesion. The freeing of Hannah and Kodi by Natalie and their ensuing clash with Shauna's faction culminate in violent chaos, reinforcing the symbolic and literal collapse of camaraderie under extreme pressures. The episode's bleak survivalism is portrayed without romanticization, invoking brutal realism alongside psychological horror, such as when Melissa, cornered and terrified, rebels violently, stabbing Kodi in a tense showdown. These moments underscore not only the characters' individual survival instincts but also how trauma distorts moral boundaries and human relationships.
Transitions to the 1998 timeline sharpen the series' psychological thriller aspects, especially through Shauna and Melissa's explosive confrontation that leaves bodily harm and emotional wounds in its wake. Melanie Lynskey's layered performance as Shauna conveys a complex mix of rage, pain, and fractured identity, culminating in a chilling moment where Shauna fires a shot that grazes Melissa, dramatically raising the stakes of their fraught relationship. The raw tension spills over with Loyalties shifting, alliances breaking, and the past's ghosts materially affecting the survivors' present - literally bleeding into their lives.
One of the most devastating and emotionally resonant moments unfolds with Van's death, a loss that reverberates deeply throughout the survivor group. The episode poignantly depicts Van's struggle and eventual demise from carbon monoxide poisoning, orchestrated by Melissa's calculated decision during a suffocating stand-off. The narrative intertwines this with Van's spectral journey, engaging with her younger self in a surreal, emotional meditation on fate, power, and identity. This scene, imbued with both heartbreak and haunting beauty, serves as a profound commentary on survival's costs and the psychological fractures that persist long after physical ordeals.
Director Ben Semanoff employs a taut yet emotionally evocative style throughout "How the Story Ends." The cinematography uses cold, muted tones that enhance the oppressive wilderness atmosphere, contrasting with claustrophobic indoor scenes brimming with tension and emotional strife. Editing choices sustain a rhythmic balance between suspenseful action sequences and introspective character moments, allowing the narrative's complicated thematic layers-including trust, betrayal, and the cyclical nature of trauma-to unfold with measured intensity. The sound design subtly shifts between naturalistic wilderness ambiance and unsettling silence or discord, amplifying unease.
Performances remain an episode highlight, with Sophie Nélisse's younger Shauna juxtaposed by Melanie Lynskey's adult portrayal of a woman unraveling under the weight of her past and present. Hilary Swank's Melissa embodies a chilling ambiguity-simultaneously vulnerable and ruthless-while Jasmin Savoy Brown's Tai oscillates between fragile stability and ominous transformation, especially in the episode's ambiguous closing moments. Courtney Eaton's Lottie and Joel McHale's Kodi also contribute significantly to the tense dynamics, their character arcs intensifying the vicious mosaic of survival, power, and betrayal.
Among the episode's standout scenes are the escalating gunpoint standoffs in the wilderness, the chaotic battle between factions, the tense standoff leading to Van's tragic death, and Van's ethereal interaction with her younger self-sequences that resonate with both visceral impact and psychological depth. The episode's pacing, while deliberate, effectively evokes a creeping sense of doom that reflects the inevitability embedded in the titular "How the Story Ends."
Thematically, the episode probes the inescapability of trauma's imprint and the ways survival compels characters to make brutal choices that haunt both their shared and individual stories. It interrogates the breakdown of community under duress and the fracturing of identity, especially focusing on how past horrors continually echo into the present. The idea of fate versus free will permeates the narrative, with characters caught in cycles of violence and loss seemingly beyond their control, raising existential questions about agency amid chaos.
Contextually, this episode situates Yellowjackets firmly within the lineage of psychological survival dramas that blend horror, mystery, and feminist narratives. Drawing implicit comparisons to literary and cinematic predecessors such as Lord of the Flies and Mare of Easttown, the episode balances primal survivalism with sophisticated character study. Its genre-bending approach, weaving supernatural undertones with stark realism, expands the cultural dialogue around trauma's depiction in media and its impact on identity, memory, and female relationships.
Critically, "How the Story Ends" received a broadly positive reception for its intense performances, narrative courage, and emotional weight, although some critiques pointed to pacing that felt uneven or moments where thematic ambitions outpaced narrative cohesion. Nevertheless, its willingness to embrace moral ambiguity, depict harrowing loss, and deepen psychological complexity affirms the series' compelling voice in contemporary television.
"How the Story Ends" serves as a powerful, unsettling penultimate episode that distills Yellowjackets Season 3's core strengths: forging a nuanced exploration of trauma, survival, and fractured identity, accented by visceral drama and haunting performances. It challenges viewers to confront the brutal realities and psychological costs of endurance, accentuating how the past irrevocably informs the present. The episode's harrowing storytelling and thematic daring compel reflection on the cycles of violence and the tenuous grip of humanity amid devastation, setting a tense and evocative stage for the season's finale.
Incompetent writers ruined the story, 25 years is a long time, I'm sure the actors were unaware of the script when they were acting, giving Shauna so much privilege is a complete farce, supporting such a psychopath is a complete farce.
I'm sure they don't know what they want to do. Mystical events are coming and going and they're getting bored. Why didn't anything happen for 25 years? Did 3 people stop them when they had the chance to escape? I've never seen a disgusting character like Shauna. The author may be trying to make her look like herself. They are filming episodes just to extend the series. I am watching the ridiculous dialogues 25 years later, very boringly.
I'm sure they don't know what they want to do. Mystical events are coming and going and they're getting bored. Why didn't anything happen for 25 years? Did 3 people stop them when they had the chance to escape? I've never seen a disgusting character like Shauna. The author may be trying to make her look like herself. They are filming episodes just to extend the series. I am watching the ridiculous dialogues 25 years later, very boringly.
I love this show. It's far from perfect. I have a love hate relationship with these characters, some episode arcs I much prefer the wilderness over the present for sure but I never take any of it too seriously. I enjoy the mystery, I laugh, I cry. I enjoy coming up with theories. If you don't like it, don't watch. But if you're on the fence I recommend viewing some YouTube breakdown videos, they're a lot of fun and you might enjoy the show more if you are part of the fan community trying to guess what's going to happen next week! Sometimes having some background knowledge about the writers and producers intentions that these YouTubers have also might help better inform you of some of these crazy storyline ideas in the first place !! Lastly, best soundtrack on tv.
The third good episode of the season that I liked because of all the new people and
situations in it. I agree that it isn't super quality relational to season 1, but not much worse than season 2. This time it wasn't too mild and melodramatic and they got it sharper with more thrilling sub-plots, though the last 5 minutes were needless, illogical and I shove that armor down their throat.
I so despise Shauna and Melissa!
I so despise Shauna and Melissa!
- Screenplay/storyline/plots: 7
- Production value/impact: 7
- Development: 7.5
- Realism: 7
- Entertainment: 7
- Acting: 7
- Filming/photography/cinematography: 7.5
- VFX: 7.5
- Music/score/sound: 6.5
- Depth: 6.5
- Logic: 4
- Flow: 7
- Drama/psychological/mystery/thriller: 7
- Ending: 7.
¿Sabías que…?
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 55min
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta