Sarah Franklin: The box is untraceable.
Billy Martinez: Couldn't track down whoever VP123 is either. Which means still no leads on who threw the party, but we did find something else.
Sarah Franklin: At first we thought these were the usual Slamm'd cans, but they're not.
Olympia Lawrence: They must be the beta version. They were testing out different colors, logos, fonts.
Sarah Franklin: Makes sense. The parties were before Slamm'd went to market.
Billy Martinez: Exactly. Which means they had to come directly from Slamm'd, which means Slamm'd has to be connected to the parties. That's our link.
Olympia Lawrence: You did great work. Problem is, defense will argue he got the cans from somewhere else. They could've fallen off the back of a truck. It's all circumstantial.
Billy Martinez: But the DJ was paid.
Olympia Lawrence: And we don't know how.
Shae Banfield: Because they buried it with creative accounting. Single-use vendor, an errant payment, even a charitable donation. That way, they wouldn't have to disclose, which is completely unethical.
Madeline Matlock: They'd do that?
Shae Banfield: Oh, you wouldn't believe the shady ways corporations cover things up. It makes me so crazy.
Madeline Matlock: Well, these were research and development parties, right? So what were they researching?
Shae Banfield: That's easy to figure out. Look at what changed on the can.
Billy Martinez: It's a different tiger.
Shae Banfield: So, the mascot.
Sarah Franklin: Also, the warning label has slightly different wording.
Shae Banfield: So, the language.
Shae Banfield: Wait. Are there studies that match those changes in discovery? Because there is always a study before a company changes anything, whether it's a warning label, a color, a character.
Sarah Franklin: There is one for the warning label, but there is nothing about the tiger.
Shae Banfield: They must have hidden it from discovery. There's a missing document.
