Amy Lynn Bradley, de 23 años, desaparece durante un crucero familiar el 24 de marzo de 1998. Un documental de 3 partes explora teorías y sigue la búsqueda familiar de respuestas.Amy Lynn Bradley, de 23 años, desaparece durante un crucero familiar el 24 de marzo de 1998. Un documental de 3 partes explora teorías y sigue la búsqueda familiar de respuestas.Amy Lynn Bradley, de 23 años, desaparece durante un crucero familiar el 24 de marzo de 1998. Un documental de 3 partes explora teorías y sigue la búsqueda familiar de respuestas.
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
As a fan of true crime documentaries, I went into Amy Bradley Is Missing without knowing much about the case - just that it involved a disappearance at sea, which immediately piqued my interest. The idea that someone could vanish from a cruise ship is incredibly mysterious, and the show leans heavily into that intrigue.
That said, the pacing is noticeably slow. The first episode is a real slow burner, taking its time to build up. It's not until the second episode that things start to pick up with the introduction of darker themes like sex trafficking. Even then, it takes a while before it becomes truly gripping.
At this stage, I'm finding it a bit of a drag. There's a lack of emotional connection for me personally, and while the mystery is compelling, the presentation hasn't quite drawn me in as much as I hoped.
Overall, it's a decent watch if you're into slow-building mysteries, but don't expect to be instantly hooked. It might be more rewarding for viewers with patience and a strong interest in missing persons cases.
That said, the pacing is noticeably slow. The first episode is a real slow burner, taking its time to build up. It's not until the second episode that things start to pick up with the introduction of darker themes like sex trafficking. Even then, it takes a while before it becomes truly gripping.
At this stage, I'm finding it a bit of a drag. There's a lack of emotional connection for me personally, and while the mystery is compelling, the presentation hasn't quite drawn me in as much as I hoped.
Overall, it's a decent watch if you're into slow-building mysteries, but don't expect to be instantly hooked. It might be more rewarding for viewers with patience and a strong interest in missing persons cases.
Netflix's three-part documentary on Amy Bradley grips with emotion but fails as investigation. Instead of cutting implausible theories, it indulges them. Witness accounts are treated as fact, though any detective knows memory under fatigue, alcohol, and hindsight is unreliable. Hard evidence is what matters, and the series barely touches it.
The "crew conspiracy" theory collapses immediately. Twenty-seven years, no anomalies, no leaks, no history of criminal activity among the staff. A smuggling plot would have required multiple conspirators, sustained silence, and operational risk that simply never happened. The idea she walked off is equally implausible: Amy was young, attractive, and would have been noticed-especially barefoot at dawn, carrying no bag, after a sleepless night. Male crew in particular would have seen her. She did not disembark unseen.
She was also safe on her balcony. Extraction from there was not possible without family or nearby passengers hearing or seeing. What remains, after eliminating noise and fantasy, is the only plausible explanation: Amy, overwhelmed, in acute distress but without a planned suicide, went overboard. No attempt to swim, carried out by currents, never recovered. Painful, but parsimonious.
Netflix could have told that disciplined story-constraints, timelines, elimination of the impossible. Instead, it served speculation. Compelling television, yes, but not forensic truth.
The "crew conspiracy" theory collapses immediately. Twenty-seven years, no anomalies, no leaks, no history of criminal activity among the staff. A smuggling plot would have required multiple conspirators, sustained silence, and operational risk that simply never happened. The idea she walked off is equally implausible: Amy was young, attractive, and would have been noticed-especially barefoot at dawn, carrying no bag, after a sleepless night. Male crew in particular would have seen her. She did not disembark unseen.
She was also safe on her balcony. Extraction from there was not possible without family or nearby passengers hearing or seeing. What remains, after eliminating noise and fantasy, is the only plausible explanation: Amy, overwhelmed, in acute distress but without a planned suicide, went overboard. No attempt to swim, carried out by currents, never recovered. Painful, but parsimonious.
Netflix could have told that disciplined story-constraints, timelines, elimination of the impossible. Instead, it served speculation. Compelling television, yes, but not forensic truth.
Like all Netflix documentaries this was a sensationalized overview of what happened to Amy Bradley. Though it does a good job with the basic facts it glosses over questions that are obvious to the viewer in favor of sensationalized "gotcha" interviews.
Amy was a passenger on a cruise ship. The interesting thing is that she went missing from her room. She was seen at 5:30 am by her father on the balcony and then she was gone by 6:00 am. Her shoes were still there and the table was moved close to the railing. The room was tiny with three other people sleeping in it. So there is no chance anyone took her forcibly out of the room.
Over the course of 20+ years a few people have claimed to see Amy. But most are not credible. (ironically Netflix next showed me a documentary on how identifications in criminal cases are wrong). What was most pathetic for me was this documentary highlighting that some guy who runs an Amy Bradley website has someone from Barbados clicking on photos of the family. They treat that as evidence Amy is there clicking... but, in this day and age... never contacting anyone?
It is sadly obvious. Twenty years of disappearance without any contact means dead. They do go into the facts concerning Amy being a lesbian in 1998 and how that could have played into a decision to end her life... but this is Netflix and I am pretty sure they are glossing that over.
If you don't know anything about the case I would watch.
Amy was a passenger on a cruise ship. The interesting thing is that she went missing from her room. She was seen at 5:30 am by her father on the balcony and then she was gone by 6:00 am. Her shoes were still there and the table was moved close to the railing. The room was tiny with three other people sleeping in it. So there is no chance anyone took her forcibly out of the room.
Over the course of 20+ years a few people have claimed to see Amy. But most are not credible. (ironically Netflix next showed me a documentary on how identifications in criminal cases are wrong). What was most pathetic for me was this documentary highlighting that some guy who runs an Amy Bradley website has someone from Barbados clicking on photos of the family. They treat that as evidence Amy is there clicking... but, in this day and age... never contacting anyone?
It is sadly obvious. Twenty years of disappearance without any contact means dead. They do go into the facts concerning Amy being a lesbian in 1998 and how that could have played into a decision to end her life... but this is Netflix and I am pretty sure they are glossing that over.
If you don't know anything about the case I would watch.
Why didn't anyone,go knocking down doors? Especially after any sightings.
Talk to hospitals,schools,businesses.
Nothing significant happened either,when that website got repeated location hits.
If she did get pregnant based on witness testimony about Amy mentioning kids,that would mean some health/child provider or even an educator might have information.
If the kids Amy mentioned weren't hers it still means,there is kids she was around or even their families.
Was like nobody really looked past certain ship distance,due to this excuse or that.
Netflix did seem to drag things out more for sensationalism than anything,however maybe fresh eyes on the case might bring closure good or bad.
Who knows.. If Amy has kids & with technology now,anything could finally be possible.
Lastly who cares about influencers,has creditable reporting died?
Talk to hospitals,schools,businesses.
Nothing significant happened either,when that website got repeated location hits.
If she did get pregnant based on witness testimony about Amy mentioning kids,that would mean some health/child provider or even an educator might have information.
If the kids Amy mentioned weren't hers it still means,there is kids she was around or even their families.
Was like nobody really looked past certain ship distance,due to this excuse or that.
Netflix did seem to drag things out more for sensationalism than anything,however maybe fresh eyes on the case might bring closure good or bad.
Who knows.. If Amy has kids & with technology now,anything could finally be possible.
Lastly who cares about influencers,has creditable reporting died?
I have been following this case since I came across it in around 2019, and was SO excited when this doc came out. Having watched all the YouTube videos and read all the news articles I have been so intrigued by this case and truly genuinely concerned about what happened to Amy. I am only done the first episode so I will definitely be expanding on this review, but I am just so glad to see this case getting the recognition it deserves. Can't wait to watch the rest. I truly hope some resolution is found for her loved ones after all this time, but I know not to expect that in this intonational doc.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Amy Bradley Is Missing
- Locaciones de filmación
- Curacao(location)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 45min
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta