1000 Men and Me: The Bonnie Blue Story

Being neither a fan nor a foe of Bonnie Blue's, I went into this hoping to better understand why she ticks people off that much. However, Silver's flaccid approach does not even make a dent on Bonnie's practiced professional schtick. The doc is staunchly cold, oblivious, humorless, lacks insight and courage. It's neither valorizing though, sensational or incendiary; it's merely paint-by-numbers surface facts like a haughty school report. I gained more insight into Bonnie's MO by watching her rage bait YouTube interviews being hard, defensive, defiant, insolent, expressionless - however! There is a sequence of slo-mo close ups of Bonnie's face as she's having sex. She's unrecognizable in those moments, it's a different person; the softness, sweetness, kindness and peace that her face emanates; not at ALL performative or formulaic. It was shocking. Is it a clue? Is relating through the body Bonnie's only way of connecting with humans? She was a dancer after all, who knows, certainly not SIlver. Those surprising fleeting golden moments fly right over her unsuspecting head.

What is offputting here is not Bonnie taking a thousand d1cks but the director's pervasive disdain of Bonnie Blue. The final note of this glib bummer is the director's voice, wondering what she'll tell her daughter about all this; may we suggest she tells her that going forward, mommie will only be directing corporate videos.

(I wonder what a portrait of Bonnie by the Maysles brothers would be like.)

Honestly, who's idea was to give her even more "air time" is just beyond me. Just show how low we have sunk as a society when nut cases like this get their own "documentary". Just 20-30 years ago this "person" would be properly labeled and sent for a "recovery" to some mental institution.

Next example of motherless and fatherless nutcase.

This would of been fun with some interviews challenging her intellect, because watching her squirm in a seat not being able to come up with a single intelligent response to world events and facts would of made for great content. Instead her character comes across as a fembot, with some real arrogance on display, as if she's the first person to make money out of shock content.

The doc feels like a cringe-worthy infomercial for self-branding so that she can keep getting headlines, and make more money. The director plays a fence-sitter, with no interesting questions or challenges.

Interesting behind the scenes of the infamous Bonnie Blue. We see her husband (they separated during the course of the documentary), her mother explaining that few people wouldn't drop their panties for £1m a month, her team (publicist, stylist, social media manager, video editor and so on).

The documentary by Josh Pieters on Lily Phillips sleeping with 100 guys was much better, as it was asking harder questions.

Maybe most telling, i just realized that Lily Phillips and Bonnie Blue are not the same person. They're both 20 something blonde british girls doing only fans gang bangs. And maybe that's the key point: they are competing for the top spot in their niche, with exceedingly low barriers to entry (pun intended). Bezos did Amazon, Musk did Tesla, these girls are doing OF. Is it comparable? No. But if you take away all concept of morality, you're looking at business women looking to make viral content to prop up their brand in a hyper competitive algorithmic world fighting for people's attention, bringing in millions every. Single. Month.

It's the oldest job in the world for a reason.

I fully admit stopping as it just was not worth watching and scanned the rest of the alleged documentary. This was a justification for someone with some form of a narcissistic personality, and related mental health issues, to make even more content about what she is "grifting" to the audience as "empowerment." There is nothing at all "empowering about this lifestyle or this person.