bevenanchelo
nov 2021 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas8
Clasificación de bevenanchelo
Dune: Part Two had the potential to deliver an epic conclusion, but it stumbles under the weight of its own ambition. While the visuals remain stunning, the film is bloated with slow, drawn-out scenes that drain the tension rather than build it.
Character development is almost non-existent, making it hard to care about Paul's destiny or the fate of Arrakis. Dialogue feels heavy and self-important, with moments that should feel powerful coming off as flat and lifeless. The romance subplot is rushed and lacks genuine chemistry, reducing emotional stakes even further.
Action sequences, though technically impressive, are rare and often feel disconnected from the story's emotional core. The political complexity that could have been engaging instead becomes a confusing, tedious slog, leaving viewers lost in exposition.
In the end, Dune: Part Two feels like a beautifully shot but hollow desert mirage-grand in appearance, but empty in experience, leaving you waiting for a payoff that never truly arrives.
Character development is almost non-existent, making it hard to care about Paul's destiny or the fate of Arrakis. Dialogue feels heavy and self-important, with moments that should feel powerful coming off as flat and lifeless. The romance subplot is rushed and lacks genuine chemistry, reducing emotional stakes even further.
Action sequences, though technically impressive, are rare and often feel disconnected from the story's emotional core. The political complexity that could have been engaging instead becomes a confusing, tedious slog, leaving viewers lost in exposition.
In the end, Dune: Part Two feels like a beautifully shot but hollow desert mirage-grand in appearance, but empty in experience, leaving you waiting for a payoff that never truly arrives.
Dune: Part One delivers breathtaking visuals, a haunting score, and faithful world-building that captures the vastness of Arrakis beautifully. The desert landscapes and sandworm sequences are truly cinematic, making it a visual feast on the big screen.
However, despite the spectacle, the film feels emotionally distant, with characters often appearing cold and underdeveloped. The pacing is uneven, spending too much time setting up future conflicts without providing satisfying emotional payoffs in this installment. Many scenes feel like they're building toward something that never arrives, making the 2.5-hour runtime feel longer than it should.
Timothée Chalamet delivers a restrained performance, but Paul Atreides' inner struggles lack depth here, and the supporting characters, while well-cast, don't get enough space to leave a strong impression. The political intrigue is intriguing but can feel confusing for viewers unfamiliar with the source material, making it less engaging for newcomers.
While Dune: Part One succeeds in scale and ambition, it struggles to stand alone as a complete, emotionally engaging story, leaving it feeling more like an extended prologue than a satisfying film on its own.
However, despite the spectacle, the film feels emotionally distant, with characters often appearing cold and underdeveloped. The pacing is uneven, spending too much time setting up future conflicts without providing satisfying emotional payoffs in this installment. Many scenes feel like they're building toward something that never arrives, making the 2.5-hour runtime feel longer than it should.
Timothée Chalamet delivers a restrained performance, but Paul Atreides' inner struggles lack depth here, and the supporting characters, while well-cast, don't get enough space to leave a strong impression. The political intrigue is intriguing but can feel confusing for viewers unfamiliar with the source material, making it less engaging for newcomers.
While Dune: Part One succeeds in scale and ambition, it struggles to stand alone as a complete, emotionally engaging story, leaving it feeling more like an extended prologue than a satisfying film on its own.
Ziam tries to present itself as a horror experience but falls short in delivering true scares. The cinematography feels bland, lacking creativity in framing and lighting, making even the few tense moments look flat. The horror elements are minimal, with most scenes failing to build genuine suspense or fear, leaning instead on loud sounds and predictable jumps.
The VFX are poor, pulling you out of the film rather than immersing you in its world, and the storyline feels cliché, with the same haunted house tropes and a predictable "twist" you see coming from miles away. While there are a few moments that attempt to add atmosphere, they aren't enough to elevate Ziam beyond average.
Overall, Ziam is a watchable but forgettable horror film that lacks the craft needed to stand out, best suited for a casual watch if you have nothing else to do.
The VFX are poor, pulling you out of the film rather than immersing you in its world, and the storyline feels cliché, with the same haunted house tropes and a predictable "twist" you see coming from miles away. While there are a few moments that attempt to add atmosphere, they aren't enough to elevate Ziam beyond average.
Overall, Ziam is a watchable but forgettable horror film that lacks the craft needed to stand out, best suited for a casual watch if you have nothing else to do.