byattwurns
abr 2022 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas7
Clasificación de byattwurns
The movie is more than entertaining. The visuals, while not stellar, are very adequate and moody. The writing is interesting, the acting is well above standard. Heath Leger's role as the Joker is very memorable, unique and chaotic, precisely as the character he depicts. I can say at least, that he plays his role perfectly.
The only issue I can really remember is the editing. This movie doesn't breathe! Everything is compressed like a corset, and I don't think that reflects the slow and moody nature of the dark knight. Apparently, this movie is the director's cut as it is. I'm very surprised to say the least!
But, this is the kind of movie that you can put on in most situations, and it will be very entertaining, much like a nice painting or a pretty garden. I can't really say that it's innovative or refined, but it will probably hold for a few more decades.
An Eight out of Ten is more than fair in my opinion. A classic for sure, but not a 'masterpiece'.
The only issue I can really remember is the editing. This movie doesn't breathe! Everything is compressed like a corset, and I don't think that reflects the slow and moody nature of the dark knight. Apparently, this movie is the director's cut as it is. I'm very surprised to say the least!
But, this is the kind of movie that you can put on in most situations, and it will be very entertaining, much like a nice painting or a pretty garden. I can't really say that it's innovative or refined, but it will probably hold for a few more decades.
An Eight out of Ten is more than fair in my opinion. A classic for sure, but not a 'masterpiece'.
This is not a movie, this is a product. The producer does not care if you are entertained, they only want you seated.
The movie is composed of multiple, disjointed scenarios. This is so they can keep your attention without putting any effort into writing. When you reach the border of painful disinterest they switch to another boring and mundane scenario.
The visuals are realistic. They are not *good*, they are realistic. What is the difference? Life is realistic yet it is not inherently interesting. This movie is a series of colours that appear and disappear, without any content.
The rendering is good but the animation is awful. There is no ounce of expression, it's like every character is made of cardboard. The minions themselves are better treated, because they are more abstract and cartoonish.
The soundtrack is disjointed with the movie. You might as well play your own music at this rate.
The movie is too long, believe it or not. It's not too long for an audience, because it's only an hour and a half, it's too long for *itself*. Everything drags on too long because it needs to meet a feature length film duration. Considering it's real content, it would only make it around half an hour. It might of even been a better movie at that length.
The film was beyond unacceptable. I can forgive a neutral or bland movie, because at it's core it does no harm, but this one does. This one harmed me, it gave me a headache, chest pains and back pain because my mind was so numb that I couldn't even bother to move. I watched the whole thing because I didn't want to judge it unfairly. I thought the thing was two hours and a half long! Even children find the movie boring. Who makes this?
I don't understand how hard it is to write something that at least interests the artists themselves. Why do I keep seeing the essence of the 60-something chairmen in every meter of film? Even the music - Karma Chameleon as the film's ending? If you were ten years old in 1983, you would be Fifty today. That's not a parental age gap, that's pushing the retirement house! Parents today are in their late twenties to thirties. Does this not tell you just how old and out of touch these chairmen and producers are? The nostalgia is for the Nineties at *most*, I can assure you a very limited number of people today look to the Eighties with nostalgia, and they are not nearly as likely to be in the audience.
And this brings me to the final gripe. You are making a movie that runs on Nostalgia. The audience who watched your first movie were children in 2010. Why then, are you making products for those in aged care? How stupid do you truly have to be, to not realise that the "parents" you are trying to be inclusive of, are the very same children of yesteryear? I'll tell you how stupid you have to be. You have to be as stupid as a company run by greying men who can't keep their own stupid ideas out of the hands of artists. They think they know what creative work is, but confuse it for a personal fantasy. Stop letting businessmen direct.
I've been very gracious with the five stars. This movie does not deserve to even be considered. Burn it and you will lose nothing.
The movie is composed of multiple, disjointed scenarios. This is so they can keep your attention without putting any effort into writing. When you reach the border of painful disinterest they switch to another boring and mundane scenario.
The visuals are realistic. They are not *good*, they are realistic. What is the difference? Life is realistic yet it is not inherently interesting. This movie is a series of colours that appear and disappear, without any content.
The rendering is good but the animation is awful. There is no ounce of expression, it's like every character is made of cardboard. The minions themselves are better treated, because they are more abstract and cartoonish.
The soundtrack is disjointed with the movie. You might as well play your own music at this rate.
The movie is too long, believe it or not. It's not too long for an audience, because it's only an hour and a half, it's too long for *itself*. Everything drags on too long because it needs to meet a feature length film duration. Considering it's real content, it would only make it around half an hour. It might of even been a better movie at that length.
The film was beyond unacceptable. I can forgive a neutral or bland movie, because at it's core it does no harm, but this one does. This one harmed me, it gave me a headache, chest pains and back pain because my mind was so numb that I couldn't even bother to move. I watched the whole thing because I didn't want to judge it unfairly. I thought the thing was two hours and a half long! Even children find the movie boring. Who makes this?
I don't understand how hard it is to write something that at least interests the artists themselves. Why do I keep seeing the essence of the 60-something chairmen in every meter of film? Even the music - Karma Chameleon as the film's ending? If you were ten years old in 1983, you would be Fifty today. That's not a parental age gap, that's pushing the retirement house! Parents today are in their late twenties to thirties. Does this not tell you just how old and out of touch these chairmen and producers are? The nostalgia is for the Nineties at *most*, I can assure you a very limited number of people today look to the Eighties with nostalgia, and they are not nearly as likely to be in the audience.
And this brings me to the final gripe. You are making a movie that runs on Nostalgia. The audience who watched your first movie were children in 2010. Why then, are you making products for those in aged care? How stupid do you truly have to be, to not realise that the "parents" you are trying to be inclusive of, are the very same children of yesteryear? I'll tell you how stupid you have to be. You have to be as stupid as a company run by greying men who can't keep their own stupid ideas out of the hands of artists. They think they know what creative work is, but confuse it for a personal fantasy. Stop letting businessmen direct.
I've been very gracious with the five stars. This movie does not deserve to even be considered. Burn it and you will lose nothing.