ThereelscoopwithKK
jun 2022 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones502
Clasificación de ThereelscoopwithKK
Reseñas502
Clasificación de ThereelscoopwithKK
The movie takes a little time to find its rhythm, but once it clicks, you realize it's not just about a wealthy woman being chauffeured around to a Hans Zimmer score - it's about something much deeper.
It communicates so much in subtle ways: a commentary on racial dynamics in the South during that era, the growth of a genuine and believable friendship, and the evolving bond between a mother and her son as life moves forward.
On paper, there isn't a grand, sweeping plot. Yet the film resonates with tremendous soul, carried by rich dialogue and the powerhouse performances of Morgan Freeman, Jessica Tandy, and Dan Aykroyd.
The film simply wouldn't have excelled the way it did without these actors giving it life, but equal credit belongs to the casting choices and the restraint of those behind the camera, who allowed the actors talent to shine.
It communicates so much in subtle ways: a commentary on racial dynamics in the South during that era, the growth of a genuine and believable friendship, and the evolving bond between a mother and her son as life moves forward.
On paper, there isn't a grand, sweeping plot. Yet the film resonates with tremendous soul, carried by rich dialogue and the powerhouse performances of Morgan Freeman, Jessica Tandy, and Dan Aykroyd.
The film simply wouldn't have excelled the way it did without these actors giving it life, but equal credit belongs to the casting choices and the restraint of those behind the camera, who allowed the actors talent to shine.
This movie lazily recycles all the familiar tropes of a spy thriller but fails to stand out in any meaningful way. From the outset, it feels like it's checking boxes rather than crafting a story that genuinely engages the audience. The pacing is uneven, the tension is sporadic, and much of the plot seems designed only to nudge Rami Malek's character toward his inevitable endpoint. It's a film that does what spy thrillers are supposed to do-but without the finesse or heart that makes the genre compelling.
Rami Malek delivers as always-his talent is undeniable-but the character he's given doesn't allow him to shine. The grief over his wife is presented, but it never hits with the emotional weight the story wants it to. Compare it to the raw, instantly relatable motivation of John Wick losing his dog: that kind of simple, visceral loss is what makes an action protagonist truly compelling. Here, Malek's sorrow feels distant and abstract, and the film never fully lets us inhabit his pain.
Laurence Fishburne, cast as the mentor, is similarly underused. While mentors in this genre are often the emotional anchor or the moral compass, here the relationship between him and Malek's character lacks depth. Their bond is perfunctory rather than heartfelt, leaving their exchanges feeling hollow. Without a strong mentor-mentee dynamic, the story loses much of its potential emotional resonance.
The plot itself is mostly functional. Events happen to move Malek's character along a path toward his ultimate goal, but the story rarely feels organic. Key plot points exist solely to advance his arc rather than to enrich the world or explore interesting conflicts. And even as the character faces challenges, there's little sense of growth. He's clever in spots, but the transformation into a fully realized super-agent never lands, which undercuts the film's ambitions as a spy thriller.
In the end, this movie is serviceable, but it lacks the compelling characters, emotional stakes, and storytelling flair needed to make it memorable. Fans of the genre will likely find it forgettable, and newcomers won't find enough to hook them. There are many better options in spy thrillers that deliver both suspense and character depth-this one isn't worth the time.
Rami Malek delivers as always-his talent is undeniable-but the character he's given doesn't allow him to shine. The grief over his wife is presented, but it never hits with the emotional weight the story wants it to. Compare it to the raw, instantly relatable motivation of John Wick losing his dog: that kind of simple, visceral loss is what makes an action protagonist truly compelling. Here, Malek's sorrow feels distant and abstract, and the film never fully lets us inhabit his pain.
Laurence Fishburne, cast as the mentor, is similarly underused. While mentors in this genre are often the emotional anchor or the moral compass, here the relationship between him and Malek's character lacks depth. Their bond is perfunctory rather than heartfelt, leaving their exchanges feeling hollow. Without a strong mentor-mentee dynamic, the story loses much of its potential emotional resonance.
The plot itself is mostly functional. Events happen to move Malek's character along a path toward his ultimate goal, but the story rarely feels organic. Key plot points exist solely to advance his arc rather than to enrich the world or explore interesting conflicts. And even as the character faces challenges, there's little sense of growth. He's clever in spots, but the transformation into a fully realized super-agent never lands, which undercuts the film's ambitions as a spy thriller.
In the end, this movie is serviceable, but it lacks the compelling characters, emotional stakes, and storytelling flair needed to make it memorable. Fans of the genre will likely find it forgettable, and newcomers won't find enough to hook them. There are many better options in spy thrillers that deliver both suspense and character depth-this one isn't worth the time.
Well, here it is - review number 500. And in the spirit of the milestone, I picked a movie with "500" in the title. Unfortunately, that's where the fun stops.
500 MPH Storm is proof that Syfy-level disaster movies can still dig new depths of awfulness. Imagine every bad disaster cliché, stolen wholesale, then performed with the enthusiasm of a high school detention. The effects look like they were rendered on a Nintendo 64. At times I wasn't sure if I was watching tornadoes or my wifi was simply buffering. The acting (Michael Beach aside) is so stiff it makes Sharknado's flying sharks look naturalistic.
The script? Don't get me started. The son, who looks about 20, is written like a 7-10 year old should be. Pseudoscience and technobabble is tossed around I'm guessing to try and intimidate the audience. Apparently, hurricanes chase families around like Scooby-Doo villains, nuclear meltdowns are fixed by shooting missiles at them , and storms are born and destroyed based on where large energy lasers are pointed ? That's it. That's the backstory.
For a supposed nationwide apocalypse, the streets are strangely empty. No evacuations, no chaos, no extras - just a family of four and a couple of scientists. By the end, the movie doesn't even bother with a conclusion. One random house is destroyed, credits roll, and you're left wondering if the filmmakers ran out of money mid-edit.
So here it is: my 500th review. Fittingly, a movie with "500" in the title - memorable only because it's spectacularly bad. If Sharknado is a guilty pleasure, 500 MPH Storm is just guilty.
500 MPH Storm is proof that Syfy-level disaster movies can still dig new depths of awfulness. Imagine every bad disaster cliché, stolen wholesale, then performed with the enthusiasm of a high school detention. The effects look like they were rendered on a Nintendo 64. At times I wasn't sure if I was watching tornadoes or my wifi was simply buffering. The acting (Michael Beach aside) is so stiff it makes Sharknado's flying sharks look naturalistic.
The script? Don't get me started. The son, who looks about 20, is written like a 7-10 year old should be. Pseudoscience and technobabble is tossed around I'm guessing to try and intimidate the audience. Apparently, hurricanes chase families around like Scooby-Doo villains, nuclear meltdowns are fixed by shooting missiles at them , and storms are born and destroyed based on where large energy lasers are pointed ? That's it. That's the backstory.
For a supposed nationwide apocalypse, the streets are strangely empty. No evacuations, no chaos, no extras - just a family of four and a couple of scientists. By the end, the movie doesn't even bother with a conclusion. One random house is destroyed, credits roll, and you're left wondering if the filmmakers ran out of money mid-edit.
So here it is: my 500th review. Fittingly, a movie with "500" in the title - memorable only because it's spectacularly bad. If Sharknado is a guilty pleasure, 500 MPH Storm is just guilty.