edfitz982
sep 2022 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas10
Clasificación de edfitz982
This season something feels different about the adventures of Din Djarin and Grogu. There is a level of maturity and narrative consistency that seems very cohesive.
This episode explores what happens to agents of the Empire after the Battle of Endor. It shows how indoctrination leaves a taste of nostalgia and how good life can be if you're the one doing the oppressing. There's a disturbing conversation that would be on par with post war War Germany where there's a harp back to the "glory days". This was carefully worded and crafted. While Andor approaches these types of scenes with more groundedness, this was a big step for the Mandalorian.
Remember, this is a show that for the two previous seasons relied heavily on villain of the week format with the narrative advancing slowly. This season focuses heavily on story telling mixed with action and it pays off.
The only let down this season is that some scenes have sub par special FX. This is new territory for the Mandalorian as up until now the FX have been stellar. It doesn't take away from the story.
A very good episode. Strong writing. This is the way!
This episode explores what happens to agents of the Empire after the Battle of Endor. It shows how indoctrination leaves a taste of nostalgia and how good life can be if you're the one doing the oppressing. There's a disturbing conversation that would be on par with post war War Germany where there's a harp back to the "glory days". This was carefully worded and crafted. While Andor approaches these types of scenes with more groundedness, this was a big step for the Mandalorian.
Remember, this is a show that for the two previous seasons relied heavily on villain of the week format with the narrative advancing slowly. This season focuses heavily on story telling mixed with action and it pays off.
The only let down this season is that some scenes have sub par special FX. This is new territory for the Mandalorian as up until now the FX have been stellar. It doesn't take away from the story.
A very good episode. Strong writing. This is the way!
A Columbo meets Murder, She Wrote meets Natasha Lyonne's grit - mystery of the week show.
The shows premise is the same in every episode, Charlie (Lyonne) arrives in a town and sets about working and living her life when the unexpected happens... a murder occurs. Whether it's someone directly linked to Charlie or by a certain degree of separation, she begins to investigate the murder.
She is aided by her instincts on when people are lying. She has a nervous tick when people lie, she calls "Bullsh!t". She utilises this in routing out the murderer.
The issue the show faces is that the murderer is revealed to the audience at the start of the episode and so the rest of the episode shows us how Charlie solves the mystery. This is where things get challenging, if there's no element of discovery for the audience and we know that things are made somewhat easy for the main character as they are a human lie detector then really you're left watching is for the quirks, gimmicks and the A lister of the week guest spot.
The show could benefit from having the audience journey along with the mystery element. If the audience is in on the secret but Charlie isn't then her discovery of the facts don't always thrill. It would be a better shift for the shows longevity to keep the element of surprise so that the audience can discover and question things as Charlie does. With the reveal coming at the end of the episode.
When the murder is revealed the audience at the start of the episode it makes the narrative much easier. Instead of solving a mystery, the audience are being bread crumbed so that Charlie can solve it. It's a premise that's good for some episodes but ultimately when watch a murder mystery show, you want to be surprised.
Natasha Lyonne is a character in herself and no matter what character she plays, she is always authentic to herself. She's charismatic. I wish her every success with the show. It's a solid and entertaining entry into the quirky murder mystery genre.
The shows premise is the same in every episode, Charlie (Lyonne) arrives in a town and sets about working and living her life when the unexpected happens... a murder occurs. Whether it's someone directly linked to Charlie or by a certain degree of separation, she begins to investigate the murder.
She is aided by her instincts on when people are lying. She has a nervous tick when people lie, she calls "Bullsh!t". She utilises this in routing out the murderer.
The issue the show faces is that the murderer is revealed to the audience at the start of the episode and so the rest of the episode shows us how Charlie solves the mystery. This is where things get challenging, if there's no element of discovery for the audience and we know that things are made somewhat easy for the main character as they are a human lie detector then really you're left watching is for the quirks, gimmicks and the A lister of the week guest spot.
The show could benefit from having the audience journey along with the mystery element. If the audience is in on the secret but Charlie isn't then her discovery of the facts don't always thrill. It would be a better shift for the shows longevity to keep the element of surprise so that the audience can discover and question things as Charlie does. With the reveal coming at the end of the episode.
When the murder is revealed the audience at the start of the episode it makes the narrative much easier. Instead of solving a mystery, the audience are being bread crumbed so that Charlie can solve it. It's a premise that's good for some episodes but ultimately when watch a murder mystery show, you want to be surprised.
Natasha Lyonne is a character in herself and no matter what character she plays, she is always authentic to herself. She's charismatic. I wish her every success with the show. It's a solid and entertaining entry into the quirky murder mystery genre.
The Last of Us: Another great episode last night. What I like about it is how human it is, there has just been maybe two scenes where zombies appeared and you hardly even notice it.
The real story is the human element, not the zombie apocalypse.
I think where shows like the Walking Dead made their mistake was constant repetition of the same narrative.
It is early to say but I feel the benefit of the The Last of Us being based on a game is that it has a finite and self contain story where that story already has a test audience.
I also like how the show pays homage to video game styled missions... the "I'm too big to fit in there, can you fit through that tiny hole and open the door" so I don't have to smash the window etc. I haven't played the game but I know that's a tried and tested video game technique.
I also think that it kinda adds more reality to it in a way, cos I wouldn't smash a window... I'd be like, get in there and open the door. 😂
Once again we have a whole episode which explores relationships. So far that has been the focus;
Joel and his daughter, Sarah.
Joel and his partner, Tess.
Bill and Frank Joel and Ellie.
It's very nicely done because it shows us that as much as Joel wants to be this cold blooded self serving person, there are people he cares about.
It's really refreshing to have a series that crafts these relationships without it feeling overwhelmingly expositional.... Although pretty much most of it is a character study and exposition. It's just done well and written cohesively.
The real story is the human element, not the zombie apocalypse.
I think where shows like the Walking Dead made their mistake was constant repetition of the same narrative.
It is early to say but I feel the benefit of the The Last of Us being based on a game is that it has a finite and self contain story where that story already has a test audience.
I also like how the show pays homage to video game styled missions... the "I'm too big to fit in there, can you fit through that tiny hole and open the door" so I don't have to smash the window etc. I haven't played the game but I know that's a tried and tested video game technique.
I also think that it kinda adds more reality to it in a way, cos I wouldn't smash a window... I'd be like, get in there and open the door. 😂
Once again we have a whole episode which explores relationships. So far that has been the focus;
Joel and his daughter, Sarah.
Joel and his partner, Tess.
Bill and Frank Joel and Ellie.
It's very nicely done because it shows us that as much as Joel wants to be this cold blooded self serving person, there are people he cares about.
It's really refreshing to have a series that crafts these relationships without it feeling overwhelmingly expositional.... Although pretty much most of it is a character study and exposition. It's just done well and written cohesively.