snewkyblinders
nov 2022 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas36
Clasificación de snewkyblinders
Just watched Smile 2 (2024), and I daresay, it is nothing short of a marvel. This movie not only lives up to its hype but dauntlessly raises the very standard of the horror movie genre. Never before had I thought to regard horror as art, yet this film has entirely altered my perception, presenting terror as a thing of haunting beauty. It is, without doubt, a bold and pure cinematic brilliance.
As for the Parker Finn, the director of this chilling tale, one cannot help but offer hearty applause. With just two films under his belt (Smile and now Smile 2), he has already cemented himself as a director of prodigious talent. A round of applause is most deserved! An easy 8 out of 10 from me.
As for the Parker Finn, the director of this chilling tale, one cannot help but offer hearty applause. With just two films under his belt (Smile and now Smile 2), he has already cemented himself as a director of prodigious talent. A round of applause is most deserved! An easy 8 out of 10 from me.
The 2017 retelling of Papillon offers a visually striking and emotionally earnest take on Henri Charrière's tale of survival and defiance. Charlie Hunnam and Rami Malek deliver solid performances as Papillon and Dega, but the film lacks the raw edge of the 1973 original. By explicitly showing Papillon's eventual freedom and legacy, the new version opts for resolution over the ambiguity that once left audiences questioning and inspired.
Though technically refined, the remake sacrifices the existential weight and bold spirit of its predecessor for a safer, more conventional narrative. Where the original soared on its audacity, this version glides on polished visuals and heartfelt camaraderie but never truly soars. 6 out of 10.
Though technically refined, the remake sacrifices the existential weight and bold spirit of its predecessor for a safer, more conventional narrative. Where the original soared on its audacity, this version glides on polished visuals and heartfelt camaraderie but never truly soars. 6 out of 10.
The Different Man stands as a muted yet intricate reflection of the human psyche, inviting viewers to a realm where identity is not merely questioned but dissected as if by brushstrokes upon a canvas. Its beauty lies in its quiet wit and reserved artistry, a slow symphony of introspection that touches gently upon the viewer's own inner reflections.
Yet, herein lies its flaw. While admirably poised as an artful exploration, it sometimes ventures into the overly abstract, leaving substance behind for the sake of aesthetic allure. The elegance of its premise is shadowed by moments where the narrative teeters, losing the sharpness of its message. Thus, it becomes an admirable yet imperfect work-a piece better appreciated than understood, more art than answer.
Yet, herein lies its flaw. While admirably poised as an artful exploration, it sometimes ventures into the overly abstract, leaving substance behind for the sake of aesthetic allure. The elegance of its premise is shadowed by moments where the narrative teeters, losing the sharpness of its message. Thus, it becomes an admirable yet imperfect work-a piece better appreciated than understood, more art than answer.