movies_are_life_
dic 2022 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas92
Clasificación de movies_are_life_
"Weapons" is another in a string of well-made, highly praised films that critics seem to elevate despite flaws. While this has likely always happened, it feels increasingly common, perhaps due to recency bias. Although "Weapons" is very good, it has undeniable issues that a single line of dialogue cannot dismiss.
In the opening narration, a line states the police mishandled the investigation of 17 missing children. This sets up an unconventional premise that leads to a disappointing third act, as the resolution falls flat. Other unresolved elements include the complete lack of explanation for key events. The first 90 minutes deliver a gripping thriller with strong acting, engaging plots, and stylish direction, though I feared the payoff might not match the buildup.
I don't want to downplay what the film does well, but I wish good movies like this could be great. A 90-minute slasher wouldn't demand as much, but this two-hour buildup fails to deliver a satisfying conclusion. I'd still recommend experiencing this film once, like a car race that runs out of gas just before the finish line rather than ending in a photo finish. The ride is worth it, but the ending dampens any desire for a repeat.
In the opening narration, a line states the police mishandled the investigation of 17 missing children. This sets up an unconventional premise that leads to a disappointing third act, as the resolution falls flat. Other unresolved elements include the complete lack of explanation for key events. The first 90 minutes deliver a gripping thriller with strong acting, engaging plots, and stylish direction, though I feared the payoff might not match the buildup.
I don't want to downplay what the film does well, but I wish good movies like this could be great. A 90-minute slasher wouldn't demand as much, but this two-hour buildup fails to deliver a satisfying conclusion. I'd still recommend experiencing this film once, like a car race that runs out of gas just before the finish line rather than ending in a photo finish. The ride is worth it, but the ending dampens any desire for a repeat.
"I Know What You Did Last Summer" faced significant challenges. The controversial requel title, negative reactions to recent franchise entries, and certain decisions in the film have led to mixed reviews. Personally, I found plenty to critique, but I ended up enjoying it enough to want to revisit it.
The script's dialogue could use some refinement. It feels overly modern and clunky at times, making it hard to connect with the main characters. The final act, in particular, has some especially awkward and unappealing lines. Despite these flaws, the negatives are overshadowed by intriguing elements. The story seems complex at first but becomes clearer if you closely follow the plot-driving dialogue. References to the original film-and even its sequel-are seamlessly woven into the narrative. The character arcs and subverted expectations kept things fresh. While some of the creative choices resonated with me, it's clear from the negative reactions that others simply didn't vibe with them.
I'm eager to rewatch it and catch details I missed the first time. The expanded roles of returning characters, an engaging story, a strong pace, striking visuals, and effective death scenes worked well for me. I anticipated the backlash, knowing there's plenty to dislike, but I connected with the film on a personal level. I wouldn't say only fans of the original (or its sequel) will enjoy it, but if you go in looking for reasons to hate it, you'll find them easily.
The script's dialogue could use some refinement. It feels overly modern and clunky at times, making it hard to connect with the main characters. The final act, in particular, has some especially awkward and unappealing lines. Despite these flaws, the negatives are overshadowed by intriguing elements. The story seems complex at first but becomes clearer if you closely follow the plot-driving dialogue. References to the original film-and even its sequel-are seamlessly woven into the narrative. The character arcs and subverted expectations kept things fresh. While some of the creative choices resonated with me, it's clear from the negative reactions that others simply didn't vibe with them.
I'm eager to rewatch it and catch details I missed the first time. The expanded roles of returning characters, an engaging story, a strong pace, striking visuals, and effective death scenes worked well for me. I anticipated the backlash, knowing there's plenty to dislike, but I connected with the film on a personal level. I wouldn't say only fans of the original (or its sequel) will enjoy it, but if you go in looking for reasons to hate it, you'll find them easily.