fleurlily-15190

The plot is well organised and not disjointed like the remake. The dialogues delivered by the cast sound clear and it's good that they are not accompanied by dramatic instrumental music like Oppenheimer. The time and place settings are much clearer. There are no unnecessary scenes and everything is in line with the events that actually happened. All the actors are well involved and the story is more specific in explaining the making of the bomb and there are no boring trial scenes like the Nolan film.

And the actor who played Oppenheimer's character acted much more charismatic and epic than Cillian who just acted with his bland horror face.

There are many values and lessons to be learnt from this film compared to Nolan's Oppenheimer. Hollywood and the fans of Nolan, Cillian and the supporting cast are overrating it. And I don't think it deserves to win many Oscars!!!

7.5/10.

I finally watched Dogman and didn't expect to like it. The story was very interesting and made me curious about the ultimate fate of the main character. I think Luc Besson is quite good at writing and portraying the character of Douglas. His character also develops throughout the story and is not stuck in a certain situation and certainly not pretentious. What I like about this film is that the dialogues are quite meaningful and in accordance with the reality of human life. A little bit religious. Despite the controversy of Luc Besson, I admit that he is quite good at making films. This film is worthy and fun to watch.

This film was very strange to me, many people praised it but not me. The film is a structural mess, the dialogues feel unnatural because there is no emotion from the conversation of each character, even the actors who are talented in acting are unable to save Oppenheimer's story because everything feels hollow and flat. The visuals were very ordinary like a film made by an amateur director and the audio sound was very noisy even when the characters were talking. I hate the lies of actors, reviewers and fans who praise this film as a masterpiece and Nolan as the best film director when there are still many directors who are more extraordinary in creating their work than Nolan and his PR team who made every effort to make Oppenheimer's film look WOW but the quality presented in the film was zonk without any meaningful value from the story.