cineyapper
feb 2024 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas1
Clasificación de cineyapper
You guys throw the word propaganda around way too much it's irritating. Shut up PLEASE.
We've always read one perspective of gandhi and the freedom movement in our textbooks; the positive one. The one that praises the hell out of gandhi and nehru. BUT the actual situations back then and the many people who all took part in freeing the motherland are topics that are undoubtedly more nuanced than the digestible small paragraphs we grew up memorizing. This movie showcases a man whose name hasn't been popularised in history even though he contributed to our freedom. That is NOT propaganda.
I don't understand people saying savarkar as a man and his complexity weren't captured when the entire film revolves around him honestly talking about his unshakeable belief in violence and training the youth to achieve an armed revolution. It even showed the people that followed his society and killed many of the british officers were very young men whose lives were cut short and his statements that all citizens of hind are hindus even if they're of different religions which is a very problematic statement. He was a troubled man with many problems who, throughout his life, struggled for freedom and the movie portrayed him exactly as such 🤷♀️. In my belief, the movie was very honest about the kind of thinking savarkar had and didn't sugarcoat it at all.
The cinematography and camerawork were very interesting. Some scenes did feel out of place but overall it was good. Nothing insanely amazing though.
Randeep hooda's acting was noteworthy. His direction could be improved, but for a debut film, it IS good.
Valid criticisms of this movie (in my opinion) is that it's flow wasn't as cohesive as it should've been and it was a little too long to keep the audience hooked in fully. It captured savarkar's ideologies and passion and did have beautiful dialogues meant to evoke feelings of patriotism in the audience, but this was not consistent. The movie would've been better if the writing didn't seem all over the place.
Other than these things. It is a well made movie.
We've always read one perspective of gandhi and the freedom movement in our textbooks; the positive one. The one that praises the hell out of gandhi and nehru. BUT the actual situations back then and the many people who all took part in freeing the motherland are topics that are undoubtedly more nuanced than the digestible small paragraphs we grew up memorizing. This movie showcases a man whose name hasn't been popularised in history even though he contributed to our freedom. That is NOT propaganda.
I don't understand people saying savarkar as a man and his complexity weren't captured when the entire film revolves around him honestly talking about his unshakeable belief in violence and training the youth to achieve an armed revolution. It even showed the people that followed his society and killed many of the british officers were very young men whose lives were cut short and his statements that all citizens of hind are hindus even if they're of different religions which is a very problematic statement. He was a troubled man with many problems who, throughout his life, struggled for freedom and the movie portrayed him exactly as such 🤷♀️. In my belief, the movie was very honest about the kind of thinking savarkar had and didn't sugarcoat it at all.
The cinematography and camerawork were very interesting. Some scenes did feel out of place but overall it was good. Nothing insanely amazing though.
Randeep hooda's acting was noteworthy. His direction could be improved, but for a debut film, it IS good.
Valid criticisms of this movie (in my opinion) is that it's flow wasn't as cohesive as it should've been and it was a little too long to keep the audience hooked in fully. It captured savarkar's ideologies and passion and did have beautiful dialogues meant to evoke feelings of patriotism in the audience, but this was not consistent. The movie would've been better if the writing didn't seem all over the place.
Other than these things. It is a well made movie.