rabia_nazik
dic 2024 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones71
Clasificación de rabia_nazik
Reseñas14
Clasificación de rabia_nazik
"Olive Kitteridge" is not an easy watch, but it is a profoundly rewarding one. It begins gloomy, slow, and unflinching - yet that deliberate pace and muted tone allow the story to unfold with remarkable honesty. Frances McDormand gives a career-best performance as Olive: you spend much of the series angry at her cruelty and sarcasm, but also unexpectedly moved by her deep loneliness, fear, and buried tenderness.
The series spans decades in four episodes, chronicling an entire lifespan without melodrama. Characters don't transform in Hollywood arcs; they harden, erode, crack, and occasionally soften. The cinematography evokes the bleak beauty of coastal New England perfectly - wind-beaten towns, harsh seas, and lonely roads reflect Olive's own emotional landscape.
Some viewers wonder if Olive might be on the autism spectrum because of her bluntness and social abrasiveness. Personally, I don't think so. As a psychiatrist, I see in Olive not neurodevelopmental difference but learned armor: her harshness feels like a defense forged through trauma, loss, and disappointment. She understands others all too well - and uses that insight to wound or protect herself.
As a therapist, I often work with adults carrying anger and hurt toward aging parents. What I see mirrored here is that these conflicts are rarely about the literal, living parent in front of them, but about the internalized parent image they've carried for decades. The real battle is within.
Olive's son Christopher is a perfect example. He goes to therapy and vents about his mother - yet you sense he's fighting a version of her that lives inside him. By trying to win the fight through distance or exclusion, he avoids confronting his own grief and pain. True resolution would mean facing that internal struggle, allowing for a more compassionate, peaceful connection with the real, older, lonelier mother before him.
The series doesn't sugarcoat forgiveness. It shows how hard it is - how imperfect people stay imperfect, and yet still ache for connection. That's what makes "Olive Kitteridge" so painful, so humane, and so unforgettable.
The series spans decades in four episodes, chronicling an entire lifespan without melodrama. Characters don't transform in Hollywood arcs; they harden, erode, crack, and occasionally soften. The cinematography evokes the bleak beauty of coastal New England perfectly - wind-beaten towns, harsh seas, and lonely roads reflect Olive's own emotional landscape.
Some viewers wonder if Olive might be on the autism spectrum because of her bluntness and social abrasiveness. Personally, I don't think so. As a psychiatrist, I see in Olive not neurodevelopmental difference but learned armor: her harshness feels like a defense forged through trauma, loss, and disappointment. She understands others all too well - and uses that insight to wound or protect herself.
As a therapist, I often work with adults carrying anger and hurt toward aging parents. What I see mirrored here is that these conflicts are rarely about the literal, living parent in front of them, but about the internalized parent image they've carried for decades. The real battle is within.
Olive's son Christopher is a perfect example. He goes to therapy and vents about his mother - yet you sense he's fighting a version of her that lives inside him. By trying to win the fight through distance or exclusion, he avoids confronting his own grief and pain. True resolution would mean facing that internal struggle, allowing for a more compassionate, peaceful connection with the real, older, lonelier mother before him.
The series doesn't sugarcoat forgiveness. It shows how hard it is - how imperfect people stay imperfect, and yet still ache for connection. That's what makes "Olive Kitteridge" so painful, so humane, and so unforgettable.
As a 41-year-old couples therapist, I found Addicted to Love to be much more layered than its 6.1 rating suggests. It's a film about love, sexual attraction, jealousy, and the raw fear of losing someone you love-of no longer being able to see or have them.
Watching Sam and Maggie set up their voyeuristic "lab" felt surprisingly contemporary. In 1997, there was no social media, no concept of "stalking" someone online. Yet the film anticipates today's culture of watching exes and rivals from afar. Their surveillance setup is like an early, analog metaphor for modern stalk culture-wanting to see their life without you, to monitor the very intimacy you're excluded from.
If I'd seen this film as a student, I'd probably have felt very differently. Now, I see how sharply it exposes that impulse: "If I can't have them, no one should." It also offers an understated but powerful study of envy-how it festers and becomes destructive when you're obsessed with another person's private world.
This film is a worthwhile watch if you're interested in human relationships. It's not just a rom-com or revenge comedy; it's a smart psychological mirror. While the average rating sits around 6.1, I'd personally rate it higher for its nuanced exploration of these themes.
Watching Sam and Maggie set up their voyeuristic "lab" felt surprisingly contemporary. In 1997, there was no social media, no concept of "stalking" someone online. Yet the film anticipates today's culture of watching exes and rivals from afar. Their surveillance setup is like an early, analog metaphor for modern stalk culture-wanting to see their life without you, to monitor the very intimacy you're excluded from.
If I'd seen this film as a student, I'd probably have felt very differently. Now, I see how sharply it exposes that impulse: "If I can't have them, no one should." It also offers an understated but powerful study of envy-how it festers and becomes destructive when you're obsessed with another person's private world.
This film is a worthwhile watch if you're interested in human relationships. It's not just a rom-com or revenge comedy; it's a smart psychological mirror. While the average rating sits around 6.1, I'd personally rate it higher for its nuanced exploration of these themes.
Encuestas realizadas recientemente
2 en total de las encuestas realizadas