Cornish_pirate
nov 2019 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas15
Clasificación de Cornish_pirate
I did enjoy this, but not as much as I expected from the other reviews.
It just feels that based on: Stephen Graham Ashley Walters Young lead Single shot episodes Shocking storyline We are MEANT to be impressed and it's popular to like these things. It doesn't automatically make it great entertainment though.
It was okay, but certainly not a 10/10. The acting was great in places, but wooden in others. The scenes were gripping at times, but soon because drawn out. The storyline was important and upsetting, but often unbelievable. The directing was clever, but unnecessary for the majority.
It felt like an experiment by the director and a bit amateur at times. It's worth a watch, make your own mind up.
It just feels that based on: Stephen Graham Ashley Walters Young lead Single shot episodes Shocking storyline We are MEANT to be impressed and it's popular to like these things. It doesn't automatically make it great entertainment though.
It was okay, but certainly not a 10/10. The acting was great in places, but wooden in others. The scenes were gripping at times, but soon because drawn out. The storyline was important and upsetting, but often unbelievable. The directing was clever, but unnecessary for the majority.
It felt like an experiment by the director and a bit amateur at times. It's worth a watch, make your own mind up.
Does every film need to be a masterpiece these days, or can't a movie simply entertain!
Is it ridiculous? Absolutely.
Style over substance? Without a doubt.
Predictable? Sure.
Unbelievable? 100%.
But is it entertaining? Without question!
If you're after an Oscar-worthy drama filled with intricate twists, profound writing, and thought-provoking themes that demand hours of analysis-this isn't the film for you.
However, if you're in the mood for pure entertainment - a wild blend of romance, thriller, horror, sci-fi, and action, then grab your popcorn, suspend your disbelief, and enjoy the ride.
I had a blast watching it for what it is: fun, not fine art.
Is it ridiculous? Absolutely.
Style over substance? Without a doubt.
Predictable? Sure.
Unbelievable? 100%.
But is it entertaining? Without question!
If you're after an Oscar-worthy drama filled with intricate twists, profound writing, and thought-provoking themes that demand hours of analysis-this isn't the film for you.
However, if you're in the mood for pure entertainment - a wild blend of romance, thriller, horror, sci-fi, and action, then grab your popcorn, suspend your disbelief, and enjoy the ride.
I had a blast watching it for what it is: fun, not fine art.
At the time of writing, Heretic holds a commendable 7/10 rating, and that assessment feels entirely justified. It's a film of two distinct halves-an exhilarating, masterfully crafted opening that sets a high bar, followed by a second act that, while still engaging, struggles to sustain the brilliance of its predecessor.
Much has been said about the latter half losing its way, and while there's some truth to that sentiment, I wouldn't go so far as to call it aimless. Instead, it feels like a missed opportunity-a divergence into a direction that, while competent, lacked the potential for greatness teased earlier in the narrative.
The film's shortcomings lie largely in the squandered promise of its second half, which accounts for its lost three stars. However, this doesn't diminish the overall experience. Hugh Grant, in particular, is a revelation in this role, delivering a magnetic and unsettling performance that cements him as a natural fit for more sinister, horror-centric characters. His portrayal, coupled with stellar performances across the board, ensures Heretic remains thoroughly enjoyable.
Don't be discouraged by criticisms of the second half; while it doesn't quite measure up to the electric first half, it's far from "awful." Instead, it's a film that delivers enough intrigue, strong performances, and a memorable turn by Hugh Grant to make it well worth your time.
Heretic may not reach its full potential, but it remains a solidly entertaining horror experience, and Grant's performance alone is reason enough to watch.
Much has been said about the latter half losing its way, and while there's some truth to that sentiment, I wouldn't go so far as to call it aimless. Instead, it feels like a missed opportunity-a divergence into a direction that, while competent, lacked the potential for greatness teased earlier in the narrative.
The film's shortcomings lie largely in the squandered promise of its second half, which accounts for its lost three stars. However, this doesn't diminish the overall experience. Hugh Grant, in particular, is a revelation in this role, delivering a magnetic and unsettling performance that cements him as a natural fit for more sinister, horror-centric characters. His portrayal, coupled with stellar performances across the board, ensures Heretic remains thoroughly enjoyable.
Don't be discouraged by criticisms of the second half; while it doesn't quite measure up to the electric first half, it's far from "awful." Instead, it's a film that delivers enough intrigue, strong performances, and a memorable turn by Hugh Grant to make it well worth your time.
Heretic may not reach its full potential, but it remains a solidly entertaining horror experience, and Grant's performance alone is reason enough to watch.