misterherzog
may 2020 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos3
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas2
Clasificación de misterherzog
After reading all the negative reviews here, I threw my own negative review away and started over. I'm going to call this a campy murder romp instead.
I was expecting more from Exec Prod Jason Bateman after Ozark. And while this COULD've been done more darkly like Ozark, I see now that they were playing the social media fame obsession AND murder story only for laughs and gags. Does it work? Kinda. Maybe. The jokes and dialogue could be smarter. The use of dream sequences gets a little overworked.
Cuoco and Messina play two desperate and bumbling fame-seekers who do some completely implausible things in an effort to chase notoriety but only get deeper into trouble. It's kind of a send-up of the whole social media true crime phenomenon, but it's not an obvious satire. It works if you go into it with the idea that you, the viewer, are smarter than all of the characters on the screen. They're going to prove you right in every scene.
Yes, it's obviously implausible that anyone would do any of the things that happen here. Or is it? Social media has shown that not everyone is as smart as us.
I like Cuoco and Messina but not their characters. I just want them to call the cops and end the shenanigans. And the Matt character is a bit over the top, but if you look at it like a send-up, it helps.
Don't be taken by surprise when S-1 just kind of ends without resolution. That's how it goes.
I was expecting more from Exec Prod Jason Bateman after Ozark. And while this COULD've been done more darkly like Ozark, I see now that they were playing the social media fame obsession AND murder story only for laughs and gags. Does it work? Kinda. Maybe. The jokes and dialogue could be smarter. The use of dream sequences gets a little overworked.
Cuoco and Messina play two desperate and bumbling fame-seekers who do some completely implausible things in an effort to chase notoriety but only get deeper into trouble. It's kind of a send-up of the whole social media true crime phenomenon, but it's not an obvious satire. It works if you go into it with the idea that you, the viewer, are smarter than all of the characters on the screen. They're going to prove you right in every scene.
Yes, it's obviously implausible that anyone would do any of the things that happen here. Or is it? Social media has shown that not everyone is as smart as us.
I like Cuoco and Messina but not their characters. I just want them to call the cops and end the shenanigans. And the Matt character is a bit over the top, but if you look at it like a send-up, it helps.
Don't be taken by surprise when S-1 just kind of ends without resolution. That's how it goes.
A very low end independent film featuring some very notable players, many playing themselves. It appears to be lit by car headlights, and the camera tripod only had one height, and they might have used the on-camera shotgun mic for audio.
I would love to hear the full story of what caused this film to happen. Film students could learn a lot from this. How and why the funding was cut. How and why these actors signed on to do it. (Eric Stoltz was just 3 years after Pulp Fiction.) And how the director and editor decided each individual edit. The pacing is weird.
It has the look and feel of a film school student project working with no discernible budget. But Baumbach went on to do great work, so he had to start somewhere.
I would love to hear the full story of what caused this film to happen. Film students could learn a lot from this. How and why the funding was cut. How and why these actors signed on to do it. (Eric Stoltz was just 3 years after Pulp Fiction.) And how the director and editor decided each individual edit. The pacing is weird.
It has the look and feel of a film school student project working with no discernible budget. But Baumbach went on to do great work, so he had to start somewhere.