amirgamal-80068

The film tells about an explorer who finds an Egyptian sarcophagus that was destroyed from the pyramids of the Incas in Mexico, and begins his journey to discover the reason, and on the way he meets the mummy of an Egyptian queen named Ra Amun. Oh, they brought her normal light skin and greenish-hazel eyes, and they were bringing in the first movie, King Khufu, whose skin is normal wheat, and They ride an Egyptian plane to go to Egypt, and the plane has Horus written on it and the eye of Horus is drawn on it in golden color, and they go to Aswan and it will be really magical.

Really excellent story line.

An excellent dramatic plot...a wonderful sequence of events by Thoth and Nefer...a different and varied performance by Sekhem and Denis. Wonderful sound effects.. The graphics were consistent and not vulgar.. The story helps adults and children to understand the ancient Egyptian civilization away from lies and allegations in a smooth and simplified manner. The visual effects were consistent with the auditory effects, and the script was interesting, as you do not feel the time of the movie.

This film is a unique and integrated piece of art.. With such films, cinema becomes a cultural and dramatic beacon that is more than wonderful.

The scene of the end and Cleopatra's suicide was one of the unjustifiable calamities. With the words of academic guests in the series, Cleopatra's suicide was between a poisonous snake bite or poison she took or put in her body, in addition to the possibility of her killing at the hands of Octavius. The clips placed on this talk were of Cleopatra eating a date and then dying. A scene inconsistent with the words of the speakers who never mentioned dates. There is no explanation why the producers and director chose to portray Cleopatra devouring a date grain as poison. They did not even torture their imagination, for example, by filming a shot of a date grain dipped in poison before eating it, if this was their intent, at least we were dramatically convinced, although the academics' words are elsewhere entirely. Poor writing and weaker execution of the dramatic scenes in a series whose aim is to promote and impose an idea, not to present a historical figure, except for emotional scenes and dialogues that are more suitable for a tenth-grade movie than in a "documentary" work. The academic guests were the best of the bunch, but it is clear that they did not delve into the basic issue of color as they delved into other issues and expanded, perhaps to support the required promotion, and this is something that may affect their credibility, because the color issue raised is not a transient issue.