nbalaschsola
may 2021 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas10
Clasificación de nbalaschsola
I went into 28 Years Later without having seen 28 Days or 28 Weeks Later, and I'm happy to say I still enjoyed the film very much - this film stands completely on its own. I loved everything about it.
The cast is phenomenal (10/10). Every character felt believable and nuanced. Even Erik - who I personally disliked - was compelling, and I found myself appreciating his presence in the story. That's rare.
The plot surprised me (9/10). For a zombie film, it went deeper than I expected. It wasn't just about surviving the infected - it was about how people try to connect, trust, and rebuild in the aftermath of collapse. The interpersonal relationships were where the film really hit me. I saw myself in them. I related to their fears, hopes, and need for something human to hold on to. They felt relatable and close.
Visually, it's stunning. The production and aesthetics (both 9/10) create a world that's equal parts haunting and beautiful. I was constantly drawn in by the atmosphere.
But what I loved most was the vibe. It was scary, yes - but also fun, sometimes light, sometimes devastating. Still, it carried a persistent thread of hope through everything, and that made it feel meaningful.
Whether you're a longtime fan of the saga or a newcomer like me, 28 Years Later is absolutely worth watching. It's horror with heart.
The cast is phenomenal (10/10). Every character felt believable and nuanced. Even Erik - who I personally disliked - was compelling, and I found myself appreciating his presence in the story. That's rare.
The plot surprised me (9/10). For a zombie film, it went deeper than I expected. It wasn't just about surviving the infected - it was about how people try to connect, trust, and rebuild in the aftermath of collapse. The interpersonal relationships were where the film really hit me. I saw myself in them. I related to their fears, hopes, and need for something human to hold on to. They felt relatable and close.
Visually, it's stunning. The production and aesthetics (both 9/10) create a world that's equal parts haunting and beautiful. I was constantly drawn in by the atmosphere.
But what I loved most was the vibe. It was scary, yes - but also fun, sometimes light, sometimes devastating. Still, it carried a persistent thread of hope through everything, and that made it feel meaningful.
Whether you're a longtime fan of the saga or a newcomer like me, 28 Years Later is absolutely worth watching. It's horror with heart.
Parthenope is a film that washes over you more than it speaks to you. Like 1Q84 by Murakami, it feels like wandering through a dream where not everything is meant to make sense-except this time, I found myself wishing it did.
There's no denying the film is visually stunning. Sorrentino's signature eye is fully present: light, color, architecture, and silence all choreographed with intention. The cast is impossibly beautiful, as if selected to embody a certain kind of Mediterranean myth. Aesthetic pleasure is never in short supply.
But beyond that, I struggled. The themes-whatever they were supposed to be-didn't land for me. The Great Beauty had a similar sense of drifting and decadence, but it also had bite, irony, and a melancholic clarity. It knew what it was saying even when the plot loosened. Parthenope, by contrast, felt more like a collage of moods. I kept waiting for it to say something-and maybe it did-but not in a way that reached me.
It's not a bad film. It's an experience. Just not one I found much meaning in.
There's no denying the film is visually stunning. Sorrentino's signature eye is fully present: light, color, architecture, and silence all choreographed with intention. The cast is impossibly beautiful, as if selected to embody a certain kind of Mediterranean myth. Aesthetic pleasure is never in short supply.
But beyond that, I struggled. The themes-whatever they were supposed to be-didn't land for me. The Great Beauty had a similar sense of drifting and decadence, but it also had bite, irony, and a melancholic clarity. It knew what it was saying even when the plot loosened. Parthenope, by contrast, felt more like a collage of moods. I kept waiting for it to say something-and maybe it did-but not in a way that reached me.
It's not a bad film. It's an experience. Just not one I found much meaning in.