ManasiS-99
jun 2025 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones2
Clasificación de ManasiS-99
Reseñas1
Clasificación de ManasiS-99
Went into this dumpster fire with ZERO expectations... somehow still left feeling violated. What "guts" from the director? More like what narcissism to think this incoherent mess deserved celluloid. Hats off to him for pioneering new levels of tedium. I wouldn't imaging any pea sized brain human make this kinda of movie.
Vimal didn't "live" his character - he looked like he was sleepwalking through a tax audit. MS Bhaskar "acted with conviction"? Conviction that the paycheck cleared, maybe. The heroine's "well-written character" was just... existing near the camera? Groundbreaking.
The music didn't "support the narration" - it sounded like a dying phone alarm crying for help. "Crisp editing"? More like the film was hacked apart with a rusty spoon. And the "tremendous" cinematographer? Must've filmed it through a tub of vaseline while having a stroke.
"Dialogues are the real heroes"? If by 'heroes' you mean 'war criminals' - each line murdered my brain cells. "Thought-provoking scenes"? Provoked thoughts like When will this end?" and "Why am I paying for this torture?"
Ah yes, the 'taboo subject'. Translation: Shock value plastered over a void of substance. That's not "standing out" - that's exploiting trauma to hide the fact your script is a void. This isn't cinema. It's a public nuisance masquerading as art. Avoid unless you enjoy pondering life's big questions... like how to get 2 hours of your life back.
Vimal didn't "live" his character - he looked like he was sleepwalking through a tax audit. MS Bhaskar "acted with conviction"? Conviction that the paycheck cleared, maybe. The heroine's "well-written character" was just... existing near the camera? Groundbreaking.
The music didn't "support the narration" - it sounded like a dying phone alarm crying for help. "Crisp editing"? More like the film was hacked apart with a rusty spoon. And the "tremendous" cinematographer? Must've filmed it through a tub of vaseline while having a stroke.
"Dialogues are the real heroes"? If by 'heroes' you mean 'war criminals' - each line murdered my brain cells. "Thought-provoking scenes"? Provoked thoughts like When will this end?" and "Why am I paying for this torture?"
Ah yes, the 'taboo subject'. Translation: Shock value plastered over a void of substance. That's not "standing out" - that's exploiting trauma to hide the fact your script is a void. This isn't cinema. It's a public nuisance masquerading as art. Avoid unless you enjoy pondering life's big questions... like how to get 2 hours of your life back.